west point
Engineer
+ on average the AM-2s have traveled on worse tracks.Remember folks, it's not just age, it's utilization. As an example, while the AM-2 may be newer than AM-1 the AM-2 have racked up the miles.
+ on average the AM-2s have traveled on worse tracks.Remember folks, it's not just age, it's utilization. As an example, while the AM-2 may be newer than AM-1 the AM-2 have racked up the miles.
The double end doors are a dead giveaway, it's a new BART car. For some reason they ship them by truck.Did some image search and can say for certain that it was not an Amfleet - it was newer I believe. It was also headed north, fwiw.ble
It looked a bit like a more modern interpretation of one of these, without the observation bump and with double doors on the rear more like a subway car. It had Amtrak blue which is why I say Amtrak.
It's possible it could have been going to one of the many rail museums around the state, but I don't see anything indicating that.
mix of amfleets and SPV2000 got sent down there, the amfleets were damaged enough amtrak would never clear them again for 125mph opsThat definitely happened...
What I don't understand is why foreign owned manufacturers can set up plants here in the US to build rail and transit vehicles of all types, but the few large domestic owned manufacturer's can't do likewise? Why couldn't GM or Ford get into railcar construction? Or even some of the aerospace manufacturer's?Getting back to the subject of fleet replacement; vendor selection has yet to be made but consider that the Superliner fleet has become way smaller in recent years. I believe that the fleet has very few replacement cars available that Amtrak can use but I don't have the actual numbers.
The point is that Amtrak (and VIA) need to obtain some rolling stock soon. This leads me to believe that Amtrak may be forced to go with a modified existing design that is already in production. If design and production need to start from scratch we could up with another CAF USA where it took 10 years to finish the order. That move could end LD service as we know it. What say you?
Would it be worth it for a company to start a whole new line of production in which they are unfamiliar with? We all see how all of Amtraks orders are plagued by delays with established manufactures. If you try to get new rolling stock by someone whose less familiar, I feel like that would just cause more delays. sWhat I don't understand is why foreign owned manufacturers can set up plants here in the US to build rail and transit vehicles of all types, but the few large domestic owned manufacturer's can't do likewise? Why couldn't GM or Ford get into railcar construction? Or even some of the aerospace manufacturer's?
What I don't understand is why foreign owned manufacturers can set up plants here in the US to build rail and transit vehicles of all types, but the few large domestic owned manufacturer's can't do likewise? Why couldn't GM or Ford get into railcar construction? Or even some of the aerospace manufacturer's?
If the foreign owned ones can come over here and make a profit, why can't our own?
A number of companies tried the railcar manufacturing business and failed like United Aircraft, GM, and Boeing as you mention. The Budd Company is still in business but they closed their Philadelphia Car Building facility about 20 years back because they couldn't make any money. Now its a golf course!Not that I’m necessarily a fan of the attitude “we tried it 50 years ago and it didn’t work, so we’ll never do it again,” but it should be noted that Boeing did get into the railcar manufacturing business in the 1970s and failed quite miserably.
I’d rather have a company experienced in railcar design set up shop in the US rather than a company with shops in the US suddenly try their hand at railcar design, when they’d literally be learning everything from scratch.
Companies do what they think is best for themselves. When they no longer think they make enough money on something they shut or sell that business. GE is a great example. It is easier for companies with established expertise in manufacturing a product to set up shop here than it is to establish it from scratch. I don't see the passenger car business as being so great for those that have tried. The way we buy rolling stock in this country discourages getting into the business.
Would it be worth it for a company to start a whole new line of production in which they are unfamiliar with? We all see how all of Amtraks orders are plagued by delays with established manufactures. If you try to get new rolling stock by someone whose less familiar, I feel like that would just cause more delays. s
GE also made railcars a long time ago…Not that I’m necessarily a fan of the attitude “we tried it 50 years ago and it didn’t work, so we’ll never do it again,” but it should be noted that Boeing did get into the railcar manufacturing business in the 1970s and failed quite miserably.
I’d rather have a company experienced in railcar design set up shop in the US rather than a company with shops in the US suddenly try their hand at railcar design, when they’d literally be learning everything from scratch.
GE is not a great example of anything. Under Welch it became 50% or more a finance company. I don't know when it dropped rail, perhaps in favor of finance, or after 2008. In my industry its former spot at the largest show, the largest and in front, was called the GE graveyard when it went empty. (Siemens became the largest, but not enough for that spot.) I finally found GE's unit, branded under a Chinese company. It had the smallest and most remote booth you could get.Companies do what they think is best for themselves. When they no longer think they make enough money on something they shut or sell that business. GE is a great example. It is easier for companies with established expertise in manufacturing a product to set up shop here than it is to establish it from scratch. I don't see the passenger car business as being so great for those that have tried. The way we buy rolling stock in this country discourages getting into the business.
A dome maybe, but it would likely not be ADA compliant. Open-air? Unlikely, because of too much buffeting from the wind.Would a Dome Car be an option with an outdoor option?
I think the closes we will get to a dome is the mostly wrap around windows found on sightseer cars and outdoor segments are likely a risk amtrak doesn't want to takeWould a Dome Car be an option with an outdoor option?
Amtrak does not allow anyone to be outside on the platform even on PVs attached to Amtrak trains. So no they will not get cars with outside platforms.I think the closes we will get to a dome is the mostly wrap around windows found on sightseer cars and outdoor segments are likely a risk amtrak doesn't want to take
Enter your email address to join: