Amtrak Alan
Train Attendant
- Joined
- May 30, 2009
- Messages
- 15
Does anyone have photos, etc of Jacksonville FL terminal in its peak? Also, what are the chances of the Amtrak station moving back down there?
Answer to the second question is: almost zero. It involves a convoluted backup move to get to/from that station to the route that is followed by the Silver Service trains.Does anyone have photos, etc of Jacksonville FL terminal in its peak? Also, what are the chances of the Amtrak station moving back down there?
Actually, the Jacksonville Transportation Authority's current plans are to do just that. They plan to restore the Jacksonville Terminal to its original purpose: a transportation hub. Services based at the facility will include the city's skyway and buses as well as Greyhound and Amtrak. Most of these will be based out of adjacent buildings, but the new Amtrak station will occupy much of the original Terminal building.Answer to the second question is: almost zero. It involves a convoluted backup move to get to/from that station to the route that is followed by the Silver Service trains.Does anyone have photos, etc of Jacksonville FL terminal in its peak? Also, what are the chances of the Amtrak station moving back down there?
I know. But they are dreaming. I just don't see either Amtrak or CSX agreeing to it, unless of course they can find the funds to connect the south end of the proposed station to the CSX main towards Orlando. The fact that they don't even mention that as a consideration suggests to me that at present they are just dreaming as far as Amtrak is concerned.Actually, the Jacksonville Transportation Authority's current plans are to do just that. They plan to restore the Jacksonville Terminal to its original purpose: a transportation hub. Services based at the facility will include the city's skyway and buses as well as Greyhound and Amtrak. Most of these will be based out of adjacent buildings, but the new Amtrak station will occupy much of the original Terminal building.
A picure of the planned project is here: http://www.jtaonthemove.com/Graphics/RTS/J...jrtc_image.aspx
A pdf presentation of the JTA's plans is here: http://www.jtaonthemove.com/Graphics/RTS/J...NTATION3508.pdf
I certainly recommend the site referred to here.I would check out This Site its run by the Jacksonville Terminal Railroad Museum and has a photo gallery.
After having worked with several of the so called planners I am unfortunately not very impressed by their knowledge of the context within which they do the planning. So I do not trust that they have looked into the issue until they explicitly say they have. And in this case there is not even a mention of the issue anywhere.One would think since this is part of an overall strategy to move trains back to JUS that they would be looking at what it takes to make this happen. IIRC ACL trains used this station back in the day, and they managed to do it then...
After having worked with several of the so called planners I am unfortunately not very impressed by their knowledge of the context within which they do the planning. So I do not trust that they have looked into the issue until they explicitly say they have. And in this case there is not even a mention of the issue anywhere.One would think since this is part of an overall strategy to move trains back to JUS that they would be looking at what it takes to make this happen. IIRC ACL trains used this station back in the day, and they managed to do it then...
Take out a track map around JAX of current in service and past out of service at present, tracks and convince yourself how they did it. It was always a backup move to/from the S and the A line going south, at least in the recent past (like past 40 or 50 years). What is worse now is that the backup will have to be across the neck of a very busy yard and then part way up the yard. An analogous situation in Richmond VA would be if one had to back up through half of Acca Yard to get to Richmond station, and then departing go through the yard again.
Of course anything can be done with enough money. For example an abandoned FEC right of way that connects St. Augustine on the FEC to Palatka on CSX could perhaps be re-commissioned if it is still around unencroached thus allowing trains running through JAX Union Station over FEC to St. Augustine and then swing back over to the CSX A line joining it at Palatka. I just don't see any evidence that they realize the situation enough to even start thinking about what needs to be done
I do, but unfortunately only on paper. I will look around and see if I can find one on the internet.Do you have a map that show what you mean by the backup move? Thanks
Most of that right of way still exists and a small portion of the branch is still in use. It extends about 4 miles from Moultrie Junction in downtown St. Augustine to a small industry out near I-95. The track ends there, but the right of way continues all the way to East Palatka (a little village on the east side of the St. Johns River) undisturbed. It's only been encroached in a few spots, but since everything along that right of way is farmland re-commissioning it wouldn't be much of a problem. You would have to build a bridge over the St. Johns River though and then dig your way through town to connect with the CSX A Line. A better idea would be to construct a new line between Daytona and DeLand. There is virtually nothing in the way between those two towns that would make it much of an expensive prospect, plus using the FEC between Jacksonville and Daytona would solve the problem of serving two popular destinations.Of course anything can be done with enough money. For example an abandoned FEC right of way that connects St. Augustine on the FEC to Palatka on CSX could perhaps be re-commissioned if it is still around unencroached thus allowing trains running through JAX Union Station over FEC to St. Augustine and then swing back over to the CSX A line joining it at Palatka. I just don't see any evidence that they realize the situation enough to even start thinking about what needs to be done
Sounds like an interesting idea. Have you had a chance to bring this up with any of the Florida rail advocacy groups, or perhaps even to the attention of teh Jacksonville planners?Most of that right of way still exists and a small portion of the branch is still in use. It extends about 4 miles from Moultrie Junction in downtown St. Augustine to a small industry out near I-95. The track ends there, but the right of way continues all the way to East Palatka (a little village on the east side of the St. Johns River) undisturbed. It's only been encroached in a few spots, but since everything along that right of way is farmland re-commissioning it wouldn't be much of a problem. You would have to build a bridge over the St. Johns River though and then dig your way through town to connect with the CSX A Line. A better idea would be to construct a new line between Daytona and DeLand. There is virtually nothing in the way between those two towns that would make it much of an expensive prospect, plus using the FEC between Jacksonville and Daytona would solve the problem of serving two popular destinations.
Considering that most likely the reason that there is a stop in Palatka is to serve St. Augustine, I see your point.This plan would allow the use of the old Union Terminal by both Amtraks that currently stop at Jacksonville. The only drawback would be skipping Paltaka, although Palatka isn't that big and it's only a 30 minute drive from St. Augustine so I can't imagine that being much of a loss.
I don't think the Florida Special actually stopped at Jacksonville Union Terminal. I think it made an operating stop at Baldwin, FL which is about 18 miles west of downtown Jacksonville. Both ACL and SAL had lines running through Baldwin which by bypassed Jacksonville. The City of Miami and Southwind both carried domes and operated through JAX Union Terminal. Most of the times they were Northern Pacific Dome Sleepers with the Dome area known as the "lounge in the sky". IC actually painted the City of Miami domes in their colors for the winter months when they operated from Chicago to Miami. The Southwind Domes stayed in NP colors. If I remember correctly the CM/SW Domes usually operated towards the rear of the train so it might have had something to do with clearance at JAX Union Terminal.FWIW I know this about the old JAX terminal.
I know that in the early 50's an article in TRAINS said that domes had been considered for the Chicago to Miami route but had to be dropped because of clearances in JAX.
Yet by the end of the 50's domes were on the Chicago to Miami trains. And at one time a Richmond to Miami dome was put on the winter time Florida Special, an ACL train from New York to Miami.
All of these trains approached from the north on ACL and left south on FEC.
Obviously, something happened between the early 50's and the late 50's as to the stations ability to handle domes.
FWIW
I haven't thought of bringing the idea to them. I probably should though since this might be the cheapest of all the ideas currently floating around.Sounds like an interesting idea. Have you had a chance to bring this up with any of the Florida rail advocacy groups, or perhaps even to the attention of teh Jacksonville planners?
Actually, since St. Augustine is considered a suburb of Jacksonville, when most people visit St. Augustine they use Jacksonville station. People don't think of Palatka. That town is in such a remote location it's not even thought of as an option, even though it's less than half the drive time than from Jacksonville.Considering that most likely the reason that there is a stop in Palatka is to serve St. Augustine, I see your point.
I don't think the Florida Special actually stopped at Jacksonville Union Terminal. I think it made an operating stop at Baldwin, FL which is about 18 miles west of downtown Jacksonville. Both ACL and SAL had lines running through Baldwin which by bypassed Jacksonville. The City of Miami and Southwind both carried domes and operated through JAX Union Terminal. Most of the times they were Northern Pacific Dome Sleepers with the Dome area known as the "lounge in the sky". IC actually painted the City of Miami domes in their colors for the winter months when they operated from Chicago to Miami. The Southwind Domes stayed in NP colors. If I remember correctly the CM/SW Domes usually operated towards the rear of the train so it might have had something to do with clearance at JAX Union Terminal.FWIW I know this about the old JAX terminal.
I know that in the early 50's an article in TRAINS said that domes had been considered for the Chicago to Miami route but had to be dropped because of clearances in JAX.
Yet by the end of the 50's domes were on the Chicago to Miami trains. And at one time a Richmond to Miami dome was put on the winter time Florida Special, an ACL train from New York to Miami.
All of these trains approached from the north on ACL and left south on FEC.
Obviously, something happened between the early 50's and the late 50's as to the stations ability to handle domes.
FWIW
Downtown Jacksonville is a very dense area. The only way you would be able to construct a line allowing you to jump back on the CSX main line without reversing would require a tunnel. Now I don't know how the Deland-Daytona area is developing because I'm not down there much, but by looking at Google Earth, I see there's a huge plot of land north of US-92 (which is probably swamp) that would be a perfect spot to build a FEC-CSX connector. I agree, Palatka does have a nice museum, but Jacksonville actually has a lot more history and the old Union Terminal would be much more suitable for operations than today's little station.Unfortunately, there is also a rail museum at the station in Palatka, including a caboose on stationary display outside, as of the last time we were there. Kind of kick in the teeth for those folks to bypass it. And unless you could perhaps piggyback onto the U.S. 92 ROW, there has been a lot of development in that DAB-Deland corridor, at least south of Deland - U.S. 17-92 from Sanford through Deland is pretty well packed at this point, with a lot of development west/north of I-4 (I-4 runs E-W starting at Tampa, then runs N-S through the Orlando corridor, then turns East again a ways north of Sanford. In Orlando, we confuse tourists by telling them to get on I-4 West and go South. Or vice-versa.) Seems like it would be a shorter trackwork to do something at JAX. With the current station, Sunset typically either wyed and backed into the current Jax station, or backed out and wyed upon departing it.
A line cutting through from DeLand over to Daytona would be sublime in my book. It would certainly be a more appealing option than the Thruway connecting service currently offered from DeLand Station (which is actually nothing more than a taxi-cab).Now I don't know how the Deland-Daytona area is developing because I'm not down there much, but by looking at Google Earth, I see there's a huge plot of land north of US-92 (which is probably swamp) that would be a perfect spot to build a FEC-CSX connector. I agree, Palatka does have a nice museum, but Jacksonville actually has a lot more history and the old Union Terminal would be much more suitable for operations than today's little station.
Interesting that you are worried about development around Daytona and you seem to think that there is even a spec of space to put a new ROW through the middle of Jacksonville.Seems like it would be a shorter trackwork to do something at JAX.
The Sunset Y-ing problem can theoretically be solved with a little bit of cooperation from CSX, if CSX deemd that important enough. The Sunset could run north from the S-Line branching off at Duval Connection, then run through CSX's Pritchard Yard, across NS at Duval and then join the A-Line north of Amtrak's JAX station at Dinsmore Connection, thus avoiding the need to Y.With the current station, Sunset typically either wyed and backed into the current Jax station, or backed out and wyed upon departing it.
Thanks Battalion.The Sunset would do the reverse move just south of the station at Grand Junction (IIRC). The inbound crew would always be the one who did the wyeing (unless they were running short on time).