There's the variable that could scuttle your trip. That transfer could be a lot tighter than planned. Take the Chief.Arriving 48 hours later at 125pm. Then catching a flight for $500, 6:52pm - 8:10pm, to LAX the same day.
There's the variable that could scuttle your trip. That transfer could be a lot tighter than planned. Take the Chief.Arriving 48 hours later at 125pm. Then catching a flight for $500, 6:52pm - 8:10pm, to LAX the same day.
If I understand this, you would fly from El Paso to LA? You’re missing the best scenery on the Sunset in New Mexico and Arizona. There’s no way I would do that. No diner on the Eagle. Schlep your stuff from the El Paso station to the airport, fly to LA. I get stressed just thinking about it. What if the Sunset is late? Timekeeping is better since the STB complaint, but it isn’t perfect. I can’t imagine why anyone would do that over the Chief. The Eagle is great, and if you were going all the way, my answer would be different. The Sunset Route through New Mexico and Arizona is some of the most beautiful desert anywhere and well worth the ride.I would like opinions on What Would You Do? Planning a trip from CHI to LAX for 2 seniors in a bedroom. These choices are barring no interruptions or delays. First option is, we already booked the SWC for $1955, to arrive 43 hours later. The last 8 hours is overnight while sleeping. Second option is to take the TE to ELP for $1275. Arriving 48 hours later at 125pm. Then catching a flight for $500, 6:52pm - 8:10pm, to LAX the same day. Second trip will be roughly $200 cheaper, but the day is over since we are arriving in the evening. After writing all this out, I may have answered my question myself. Both trips arrive the same day, first one in the morning, the second in the evening for $200 less. It seems my first choice may be the better one. What Do You Think?
I agree, I don’t want to be on a train for 48 hrs worrying about a connection to complete my trip.There's the variable that could scuttle your trip. That transfer could be a lot tighter than planned. Take the Chief.
The only real " change" on the Orphan Eaglete "sometime this Fall", are adding a Coach and 2nd Sleeper on 421/422 days,( 3 days a week) but not a Sightseer Lounge or Traditional Dinning between Chicago and San Antonio.I understand that the changes to the Eagle consist will be "sometime this fall." If anyone has a more specific date, please let us know.
There was a time when railroads often announced that a change would take place on a certain date, but it appears that Amtrak likes the word "sometime."
So if I understand correctly, on the 421/422 days there will be additional capacity on the Eagle over the present capacity.The only real " change" on the Orphan Eaglete "sometime this Fall", are adding a Coach and 2nd Sleeper on 421/422 days,( 3 days a week) but not a Sightseer Lounge or Traditional Dinning between Chicago and San Antonio.
In an Alternate Universe perhaps?So if I understand correctly, on the 421/422 days there will be additional capacity on the Eagle over the present capacity.
And with all the added capacity, I am sure that fares will be significantly reduced on those days. (Surely I jest.)
If those are my only two options: stay on the Chief. But I wonder what the purpose of the train trip is. Is there some event or other constraint in LAX that makes scheduling more complex?I would like opinions on What Would You Do? Planning a trip from CHI to LAX for 2 seniors in a bedroom. These choices are barring no interruptions or delays. First option is, we already booked the SWC for $1955, to arrive 43 hours later. The last 8 hours is overnight while sleeping. Second option is to take the TE to ELP for $1275. Arriving 48 hours later at 125pm. Then catching a flight for $500, 6:52pm - 8:10pm, to LAX the same day. Second trip will be roughly $200 cheaper, but the day is over since we are arriving in the evening. After writing all this out, I may have answered my question myself. Both trips arrive the same day, first one in the morning, the second in the evening for $200 less. It seems my first choice may be the better one. What Do You Think?
That's because Amtrak has to allow for the inevitable tripping over their own feet.I understand that the changes to the Eagle consist will be "sometime this fall." If anyone has a more specific date, please let us know.
There was a time when railroads often announced that a change would take place on a certain date, but it appears that Amtrak likes the word "sometime."
Train trip is for a vacation in LA. I'm staying on the SWC, since its already booked. I read on this forum a while back, someone said that paying $2000 for a train trip is too much. They said I would be better off flying first class. It just got me thinking. The price for CHI-LAX was $2138 at that time on the SWC and the TE. When I saw it go down to $1955 on the SWC I jumped on it. It was only $183 savings, but I was hoping it would reduce again. It still might. Anyway, I would rather ride a train in a bedroom than fly first class, that's just me, I love the train. To me, the train is a vacation in itself. When I saw the price from CHI-ELP at $1275 for a bedroom, that was a $680 difference, and I said hmmmmm. I still had to get too LAX, and if I flew, I priced a ticket for $500, 5 hours after the TE arrival in ELP, I would still be saving $200. (And thats if there were no delays). Thats how I got to my original post getting all y'all's opinions. But I'm staying pat with the SWC thanks to all those opinions. Thanks for your help and thanks to everyone else.If those are my only two options: stay on the Chief. But I wonder what the purpose of the train trip is. Is there some event or other constraint in LAX that makes scheduling more complex?
If you want to be on a different train than the Chief, want to be on a train for two nights, and flying partway is at least reasonable, I'd probably fly CHI-HOU and take the SL to LAX. You get the full dining car, plus you don't miss out on the good scenery of New Mexico and Arizona as @toddinde mentioned. Having been on the entire TE route and most of the SL route, I'd say the actual TE route isn't very scenic and the SL in Texas gets better as you go west from San Antonio. I think the Chief has better scenery overall than the SL, even heading westbound, but that might be a subjective take.
The advantage of flying first is that it'll be easier to change flights in case things go pear-shaped getting to Houston. ELP is a small, small airport and flights can be difficult to get unless you're flying Southwest.
Hopefully the Fares will drop on the SWC, keep monitoring daily and if they do drop, call in and Modify your Reservation( Don't Cancel and Rebook, you'll usually pay a Higher Price ).Train trip is for a vacation in LA. I'm staying on the SWC, since its already booked. I read on this forum a while back, someone said that paying $2000 for a train trip is too much. They said I would be better off flying first class. It just got me thinking. The price for CHI-LAX was $2138 at that time on the SWC and the TE. When I saw it go down to $1955 on the SWC I jumped on it. It was only $183 savings, but I was hoping it would reduce again. It still might. Anyway, I would rather ride a train in a bedroom than fly first class, that's just me, I love the train. To me, the train is a vacation in itself. When I saw the price from CHI-ELP at $1275 for a bedroom, that was a $680 difference, and I said hmmmmm. I still had to get too LAX, and if I flew, I priced a ticket for $500, 5 hours after the TE arrival in ELP, I would still be saving $200. (And thats if there were no delays). Thats how I got to my original post getting all y'all's opinions. But I'm staying pat with the SWC thanks to all those opinions. Thanks for your help and thanks to everyone else.
I've heard September 8th roughly for the northbound added coach and sleeper.I understand that the changes to the Eagle consist will be "sometime this fall." If anyone has a more specific date, please let us know.
There was a time when railroads often announced that a change would take place on a certain date, but it appears that Amtrak likes the word "sometime."
Prime Directive of Amtrak (and VIA) travel:I still had to get too LAX, and if I flew, I priced a ticket for $500, 5 hours after the TE arrival in ELP,
This is the date that the trains article said.I've heard September 8th roughly for the northbound added coach and sleeper.
Yes. I remember reading your Prime Directive before. All my mind saw was the price difference......of the train. But in the end, I made the right choice.Prime Directive of Amtrak (and VIA) travel:
NEVER schedule a connection to another carrier the same day as arrival on any North American long distance train.
Even if ignoring that, 5 hours is to connect to a flight is far too short. Add in being at the airport a minimum of 90 minutes before your flight and 30 minutes to get to airport, your train can only be 3 hours late. Long distance trains are 3 or more hours late often.
That’s a much better idea than the El Paso to LA flight. Good thinking!If those are my only two options: stay on the Chief. But I wonder what the purpose of the train trip is. Is there some event or other constraint in LAX that makes scheduling more complex?
If you want to be on a different train than the Chief, want to be on a train for two nights, and flying partway is at least reasonable, I'd probably fly CHI-HOU and take the SL to LAX. You get the full dining car, plus you don't miss out on the good scenery of New Mexico and Arizona as @toddinde mentioned. Having been on the entire TE route and most of the SL route, I'd say the actual TE route isn't very scenic and the SL in Texas gets better as you go west from San Antonio. I think the Chief has better scenery overall than the SL, even heading westbound, but that might be a subjective take.
The advantage of flying first is that it'll be easier to change flights in case things go pear-shaped getting to Houston. ELP is a small, small airport and flights can be difficult to get unless you're flying Southwest.
It has also become much easier to “modify” a reservation online. I did it quite a few times for a trip this past March from Denver to Seattle. Keeping an eye on the fares and modifying at every drop saved me over $200 and many points. The only caveat is you pretty much have to be willing to accept whatever room you get assigned after the request. But if you really don’t want the new accommodation, then a call to Amtrak can help.Hopefully the Fares will drop on the SWC, keep monitoring daily and if they do drop, call in and Modify your Reservation( Don't Cancel and Rebook, you'll usually pay a Higher Price ).
If you get an Agent that says they can't do that, ask for a Supervisor or call back for another Agent.( if you're Select or Above with AGR you can talk with AGR, their agents are usually more knowledgeable than Regular Amtrak agents.)
The first 21 with the added equipment is Sept 3 out of Chicago and the first return 22 will be on Sept 6. It’s even already loaded in the reservation system.I understand that the changes to the Eagle consist will be "sometime this fall." If anyone has a more specific date, please let us know.
There was a time when railroads often announced that a change would take place on a certain date, but it appears that Amtrak likes the word "sometime."
The length of the stop in St Louis depends on the time keeping, so if you're early you will have time to visit inside the Station which involves going up an escalator or elevator and crossing the tracks into the Train/ Bus Station.Looking to see if anyone can answer this for me. I am travelling on the Texas Eagle next month and we will be in St Louis around 7 in the morning. Does anyone know if they have any breakfast food we can buy in the station or nearby? We will have been on the train about 12 hours at that point and I anticipate getting off to move around at minimum.
Times, people and policies change, but several years ago I was on the Eagle and was denied access to the station during our layover. Granted, yes, we were well behind schedule but it wasn't train personnel who denied access, it was somebody who appeared to work in the station when I got to the top of the escalator. I was disappointed as I wanted just a quick look-see.The length of the stop in St Louis depends on the time keeping, so if you're early you will have time to visit inside the Station which involves going up an escalator or elevator and crossing the tracks into the Train/ Bus Station.
That's so annoying honestly. I like taking a look at other stations (even if they're not great).Times, people and policies change, but several years ago I was on the Eagle and was denied access to the station during our layover. Granted, yes, we were well behind schedule but it wasn't train personnel who denied access, it was somebody who appeared to work in the station when I got to the top of the escalator. I was disappointed as I wanted just a quick look-see.
421's consist is always one sleeper and one coach (unsure if its a particular type of coach).Is it possible to predict the 421 Eaglette consist for the end of September this year?
Note 421 is not a standalone train, but cars attached to 21 that are switched to 1.Is it possible to predict the 421 Eaglette consist for the end of September this year?
Enter your email address to join: