Sean Duffy nominated for Transportation Secretary

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Sean Duffy, from Wisconsin, who voted for at least one "zero out Amtrak" amendment has been nominated for the post of Transportation Secretary

https://www.trains.com/trn/news-rev...s-sean-duffy-for-secretary-of-transportation/
“[Duffy] will prioritize Excellence, Competence, Competitiveness, and Beauty when rebuilding America’s highways, tunnels, bridges and airports,” Trump said in a statement. “He will ensure our ports and dams serve our Economy without compromising our National Security, and he will make our skies safe again by eliminating DEI [diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives] for pilots and air traffic controllers.”

Naturally, no mention of rail or transit. And it is news to me that skies were not safe, certainly due to DEI initiatives.
 
Many years ago, the Congressional District he represented had good passenger rail services from Chicago and Milwaukee. With Wisconsin's plans to expand Amtrak further into the state with additional destinations and serving more communities, it will be interesting to see if he helps that along or undermines it.
Almost everyone who voted for him in those elections, also voted for Scott Walker. Duffy's district hasn't had passenger rail for 5 decades, and that's enough time for any residents to forget what they once had. Those who voted for Duffy don't use transit, and almost all of them have never taken a train trip, ever. They drive everywhere, and are highly accustomed to driving everywhere, and see nothing wrong about that. His personal views are most likely a reflection of that. Drive everywhere, never used trains or transit -- and they think that nobody uses them. During the 2010 Wisconsin gubernatorial race ( when Duffy was elected to office ), it was apparent that many who opposed the Madison service extension had only talk radio as their sole source of information regarding passenger train service, with the themes of passenger train = "wasteful government spending," "government waste," "government ineptitude," " Nobody rides, or will ever ride, trains," and especially "taxpayer rip off," "taxpayer boondoggle," et al., with other anti- government statements. Duffy has most likely never set foot aboard a train. His wife did, once, and probably became a "Never Again" passenger. I expect any future funding fights to be uphill battle, though I think there are more people who soured on the Duffy / Trump version of politics, and who are aware of just what was rejected in 2010, to gain some ground. However, I think it will be some tough going.
 
MODERATOR NOTE: many posts in this thread were removed because they were off topic, overly political and unrelated to Amtrak. This thread has been temporarily locked to avoid further discussion unrelated to Amtrak.
 
This is not meant to be political, but sometimes you can't escape it. Based upon past experience, I would say that long distance Amtrak trains will be continued. Why? They run many miles through "Red States" and districts. The usual bashing of the N.E. Corridor and Caltrain (the latter pays for most if not all of its service) will continue. The "Walter Mitty" in me would like to see the State of California vindicated with its high-speed rail project with all the naysayers with egg all over their faces.
 
MODERATOR NOTE: This thread has re-opened. Please make sure your comments are on topic and relate to Amtrak and passenger rail. Off topic and political comments will be removed.

Thank you for your cooperation, understanding and participation.
 
Back
Top