Most likely yes, if there is no traffic ahead of you to slow you down: a quick back of the envelope calculation suggests that with ~8000 HP pulling 2 engines and 10 cars up a 2% grade with 10-degree curves, you would max out at around 35 mph.
In the F40PH days, I was on a CZ/Desert Wind/Pioneer that briefly got delayed by traffic and slowed down to walking speed. While we theoretically had the power to maintain 25 mph or a bit better, if we had been GOING that fast, we weren't able to accelerate well enough to achieve that speed, and wound up creeping along at ~10mph for a while and overheating the engines; we stopped somewhere high up in the tunnel district, before Rollinsville, and sat for about an hour, then tried again and proceeded without incident.
Not really on topic for the California Zephyr, but I rode in the lead locomotive (an FP7A) of the eastbound CP Canadian on the steep grade east of Field, BC in 1977. I do not recall that the noise in the cab was excessive. The locomotives seemed to handle the grade very well.How loud would it be in the engine room or the cab when under full power?
Also, I know that they use 2 units, as one is needed for hotel power. Does one locomotive provide the electricity and the other for motive power, or do they share it?
I got to do the same thing in ~’83 in an FP-9. Such an awesome experience for someone in 6th grade. I’ll agree, it was loud when they actually had to use full power. I really wish this was an option today.Not really on topic for the California Zephyr, but I rode in the lead locomotive (an FP7A) of the eastbound CP Canadian on the steep grade east of Field, BC in 1977. I do not recall that the noise in the cab was excessive. The locomotives seemed to handle the grade very well.
That locomotive had a Roots blown 2 stroke that could howl. Beautiful sound.I got to do the same thing in ~’83 in an FP-9. Such an awesome experience for someone in 6th grade. I’ll agree, it was loud when they actually had to use full power. I really wish this was an option today.
Like this?That locomotive had a Roots blown 2 stroke that could howl. Beautiful sound.
I'm curious why the engines overheated. At 10 MPH they weren't in run 8, but even if they were, I don't see why it would matter. I would think that, to the prime movers, only throttle position matters and not speed. 74 MPH in the 8th notch should be the same as 15 MPH at the same setting to the engine. In addition, wouldn't the cooling systems keep the temps where they should be?Most likely yes, if there is no traffic ahead of you to slow you down: a quick back of the envelope calculation suggests that with ~8000 HP pulling 2 engines and 10 cars up a 2% grade with 10-degree curves, you would max out at around 35 mph.
In the F40PH days, I was on a CZ/Desert Wind/Pioneer that briefly got delayed by traffic and slowed down to walking speed. While we theoretically had the power to maintain 25 mph or a bit better, if we had been GOING that fast, we weren't able to accelerate well enough to achieve that speed, and wound up creeping along at ~10mph for a while and overheating the engines; we stopped somewhere high up in the tunnel district, before Rollinsville, and sat for about an hour, then tried again and proceeded without incident.
It may not have been the prime mover which overheated. The electrical drive system also is prone to heating up, especially when run at high power and slow speeds. I have an F3 manual from the bad old days with an ammeter chart showing the limits of what the traction motors could take. The system is different now, but I-squared-R is still the same.I'm curious why the engines overheated. At 10 MPH they weren't in run 8, but even if they were, I don't see why it would matter. I would think that, to the prime movers, only throttle position matters and not speed. 74 MPH in the 8th notch should be the same as 15 MPH at the same setting to the engine. In addition, wouldn't the cooling systems keep the temps where they should be?
I'm not disputing what you said - I'm sure you know what you're talking about. I'm just interested in the reasons behind it. Thanks.
I see what you mean. He said "engines," which is what threw me off. I think with AC motors it wouldn't be a problem, but I bet these have DC. ACs can pretty much take whatever you throw at them.It may not have been the prime mover which overheated. The electrical drive system also is prone to heating up, especially when run at high power and slow speeds. I have an F3 manual from the bad old days with an ammeter chart showing the limits of what the traction motors could take. The system is different now, but I-squared-R is still the same.
One time when Amtrak was still using road railers 2 of 3 locos failed climbing the Big Ten. Engineer even shut down HEP so he must have had to use run 8. Remember using HEP limited the loco to 900 RPM. I was worried that the DC traction motors might overheat because the train was going slow up but we made it to the Moffet tunnel. The rest of the story another time.When I ride the Zephyr out of Denver and into the Rockies it's easy to see that it's a steep grade. Anyone know if they are running the power in the 8th notch for the climb?
How'd you ask the engineer in Fraser? Did he/she open the door to get some fresh air?Update: I asked the engineer up in Fraser, CO, and he said that he uses notches 5 and 6, although he pays the most attention to amps. He said he runs at around 400A.
Tells you just how much smaller today's CZ is than they were a few decades ago, that they have that much surplus power now.
@5280Guy: if you are an Al Krug fan, and have an interest in how engineers push their units to the max at low speed, make sure you read his Kiewit, Wyoming "Tales from the Krug" story. It's with an SD9 but essentially the same story applies to any DC diesel with adjustments to the speed and how much it's pulling.
I am not too surprised that "pay attention to the amps" remains current (cough) today even on the newest power.
Enter your email address to join: