- Joined
- Jul 16, 2010
- Messages
- 4,893
In the past we have always selected a bedroom for trips. When prices were high bucket, we either paid the piper, tried another day or just skipped the trip. After once trying a roomette, the tight quarters for two and the lack of toilet privacy dissuaded us from that option.
Suddenly, when using Amsnag, lightening hit. If bedrooms were non-existent or high bucket, roomettes could still be cheap and two roomettes could be quite cheaper than a bedroom. We tried it on our last Crescent trip this month and were highly pleased.
We made our 2 roomette reservations before my spine acted up. We had planned to have her occupy lower bunk in one room and me occupy upper in other so we'd always have access to seats and a roomier dressing area but as it turned out, medical problems made it a wise, prescient choice.
amtrak.com doesn't give you the choice for room locations so best make reservations online then immediately call, bypass Julie and ask the agent to move you to rooms across from each other. We had no problems doing that.
We found low prices (lowest bucket?) on days when BRs were either sold out or really high. e.g. we got 2 roomettes ATL-->WIL for $366 when BR was $500+ and got 2 roomettes from NYP -> ATL for $420 when BR was sold out.
When our grandchild is old enough to travel with us, we could let him nap in one roomette with door nearly closed while we sit in the other.
All in all, we like the 2 roomette idea. When compared to one, it is expensive. But when compared to BR, it is very competitive in price and convenience.
Suddenly, when using Amsnag, lightening hit. If bedrooms were non-existent or high bucket, roomettes could still be cheap and two roomettes could be quite cheaper than a bedroom. We tried it on our last Crescent trip this month and were highly pleased.
- We could each have a bottom bunk - she has a knee problem and my spine was making my life miserable.
- We each had private facilities.
- We could sit together in one room and leave the other room with bed made up to take a nap or to relieve my back pain.
- We could see out of both sides of train and move to whichever side had the best view or didn't have the sun coming in. No problem of the stranger on the other side wanting to hide behind closed curtains all day ruining any chance of a view of that side.
- We could both have forward facing seats yet call to each other to come over to see a special view.
- We had more room for dressing in the morning and could go to sleep and wake up when we wanted w/o disturbing the other.
- We had room to store light things on the top bunk which could easily be pulled down for quick access.
- "Sex and the Single Bunk" worked 30 years ago but no longer so bedrooms are no better than roomettes.
- The miniature showers don't fit as well so the one down the hall is better anyway.
We made our 2 roomette reservations before my spine acted up. We had planned to have her occupy lower bunk in one room and me occupy upper in other so we'd always have access to seats and a roomier dressing area but as it turned out, medical problems made it a wise, prescient choice.
amtrak.com doesn't give you the choice for room locations so best make reservations online then immediately call, bypass Julie and ask the agent to move you to rooms across from each other. We had no problems doing that.
We found low prices (lowest bucket?) on days when BRs were either sold out or really high. e.g. we got 2 roomettes ATL-->WIL for $366 when BR was $500+ and got 2 roomettes from NYP -> ATL for $420 when BR was sold out.
When our grandchild is old enough to travel with us, we could let him nap in one roomette with door nearly closed while we sit in the other.
All in all, we like the 2 roomette idea. When compared to one, it is expensive. But when compared to BR, it is very competitive in price and convenience.
Last edited by a moderator: