Cong. John Mica lost House, considered for transportation secretary

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.

WoodyinNYC

Conductor
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
1,515
Location
NYC
I know that this is not a political site. And not much need to discuss this topic.

But I expect that members will be interested in the news that Amtrak won't have John Mica to kick it around any more.
 
I am pretty conservative, and I have to admit I was happy to see that Mica will probably lose. It will be interesting to see what happens next.
 
Roll out those new diners! Seriously, I'm not sure how Amtrak will fare under a new administration, but it has lost its biggest critic in Congress.
 
With Mica out and President-Elect Trump in, it will be an amazing time for Amtrak as he has made infrastructure rebuilding a key task.
 
I think Mica was the only one who was obsessed about food pricing, so maybe we can go back to rational commercial operations when it comes to Amtrak food?
 
Please keep comments in this thread on the topic of John Mica's Congressional race. Thank you.
 
Bill Shuster won reelection handily so I'm not sure why we're so excited about John Mica being replaced. Not to mention the humongous elephant in the room that we're not allowed to discuss. Looks as though Amtrak Unlimited is every bit as irrationally exuberant today as it has ever been.
 
AU is not stifling your right to discuss the election results at all.

Since this forum is Amtrak related, and Mica was a strong opponent of Amtrak, this is Amtrak related. But you are free to discuss any election results or other issues.

If it is not directly Amtrak related, please feel free to discuss it in the "Random Discussion" forum. Thank you.
 
I fail to see why the subject of Amtrak is sometimes judged as a partisan issue. Amtrak is there to serve the American people. Serving the American people should be in the interest of both parties. I just never understood where John Mica's interests were and I am glad that he is gone. The populist president elect must now be held to his promise to rebuild our passenger rail infrastructure.
 
With Mica out and President-Elect Trump in, it will be an amazing time for Amtrak as he has made infrastructure rebuilding a key task.
Or he could privatize the NEC, and the rest of the system out. I'm just not sure which direction the national system might go. At least it is good to know that the CA corridor trains are shielded from anything that goes on nationally.
 
Bill Shuster won reelection handily so I'm not sure why we're so excited about John Mica being replaced. Not to mention the humongous elephant in the room that we're not allowed to discuss. Looks as though Amtrak Unlimited is every bit as irrationally exuberant today as it has ever been.
Who is Bill Shuster? Never heard of him; Has he been as much an outspoken and unreasonable critic of Amtrak as John Mica?

Roll out those new diners! Seriously, I'm not sure how Amtrak will fare under a new administration, but it has lost its biggest critic in Congress.
Indeed. Now we'll see how much influence Mr. Mica really had. He technically had no more power (committee assignment aside, perhaps) than the most junior member, but again he did have influence that came with his position. Conspiracy theories abound about his having 'direct contact' with Amtrak executives; If that holds even a shred of truth, he had greatly overstepped his bounds.

WIth this sweep of government, Amtrak could likely be no more.
No. Amtrak's support has always been in Congress, even with the same party holding the Presidency and both houses.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I fail to see why the subject of Amtrak is sometimes judged as a partisan issue. Amtrak is there to serve the American people. Serving the American people should be in the interest of both parties. I just never understood where John Mica's interests were and I am glad that he is gone. The populist president elect must now be held to his promise to rebuild our passenger rail infrastructure.
Or the "angry American" people who helped elect Trump, view Amtrak as a special-interest folly, and it will be killed off quickly (faster than Obama-care).
 
I fail to see why the subject of Amtrak is sometimes judged as a partisan issue. Amtrak is there to serve the American people. Serving the American people should be in the interest of both parties. I just never understood where John Mica's interests were and I am glad that he is gone. The populist president elect must now be held to his promise to rebuild our passenger rail infrastructure.
Or the "angry American" people who helped elect Trump, view Amtrak as a special-interest folly, and it will be killed off quickly (faster than Obama-care).
Again, no.

I understand that some people here may be upset their candidate lost, but can we please stop with the nonsense?
 
Good that Mica is gone but Amtrak could be toast. He was not alone in his antipathy for it. Trump is likely to go along with the fairly tale that Amtrak could be "sold" and run privately. But there is still the factor of all the Republican districts and states that Amtrak routes run through.
 
I fail to see why the subject of Amtrak is sometimes judged as a partisan issue. Amtrak is there to serve the American people. Serving the American people should be in the interest of both parties. I just never understood where John Mica's interests were and I am glad that he is gone. The populist president elect must now be held to his promise to rebuild our passenger rail infrastructure.
Or the "angry American" people who helped elect Trump, view Amtrak as a special-interest folly, and it will be killed off quickly (faster than Obama-care).
Again, no.

I understand that some people here may be upset their candidate lost, but can we please stop with the nonsense?
Why no?

I don't see even a slightest hint that anyone who's now headed to Washington, has any interest at all in Amtrak. The talk about transit and infrastructure has never mentioned Amtrak by name (not like there are too many different LD train companies in America to remember all their names).

Its total fantasy to think that Amtrak has gotten any kind of clear-track-ahead signal by anyone.
 
I fail to see why the subject of Amtrak is sometimes judged as a partisan issue. Amtrak is there to serve the American people. Serving the American people should be in the interest of both parties. I just never understood where John Mica's interests were and I am glad that he is gone. The populist president elect must now be held to his promise to rebuild our passenger rail infrastructure.
Or the "angry American" people who helped elect Trump, view Amtrak as a special-interest folly, and it will be killed off quickly (faster than Obama-care).
Again, no.

I understand that some people here may be upset their candidate lost, but can we please stop with the nonsense?
Why no?
I don't see even a slightest hint that anyone who's now headed to Washington, has any interest at all in Amtrak. The talk about transit and infrastructure has never mentioned Amtrak by name (not like there are too many different LD train companies in America to remember all their names).

Its total fantasy to think that Amtrak has gotten any kind of clear-track-ahead signal by anyone.
It is also by the very nature of your argument that Amtrak might be left alone since they don't quite know what it is and does.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top