CP Considering trying to get out of the oil business?

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Ryan

Court Jester
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
18,051
Location
Off looking for his sense of humor
http://www.petroleumnews.com/pntruncate/322217539.shtml

Interesting article that does a good job of covering most of the issues. Don't have to to write a lengthy analysis, but it's a thought provoking read. Doesn't seem like a situation with an obvious right answer.

Canadian Pacific Railway has disclosed that its directors are reluctant to continue transporting crude oil - an idea that was swiftly quashed by the Canadian government, but was reignited by two more derailments of crude trains.

CP Rail Chief Executive Officer Hunter Harrison divulged for the first time on March 2 that his board is giving careful consideration to whether it can get out of (the crude-by-rail) business. That element of its business has increasingly burdened the company with risks and regulations that have offset a rapid growth in related revenues over recent years and involved the company in spending millions of dollars on new facilities in North Dakota and Canada.

...

However, he conceded railways are required to service all customers, provided their goods are legal and carried in approved containers, under so-called federal common carrier obligations.

We dont get to choose what we haul, Harrison said. Whatever is tendered to us, we by law have to haul. Do I want to haul to some of the places I have to? No.

...

Harrison picked up on one of his favorite themes, telling reporters after his speech that terrorism poses a greater threat to railways and the communities they pass through than derailments, regardless of the frequent accidents involving trains carrying crude and other dangerous goods.
 
Sounds to me like CP is looking for a way to get the various governments to subsidize the costs of providing improved safety infrastucture for the carrying of the oil and other hazardous cargoes.... ;)
 
They're required to carry everything, but since deregulation, they can set their own rates.

In short, they can set prohibitive rates. Why not a surcharge of $1 million per crude oil car, just to cover the insurance premiums? That's perfectly legal. Raise prices high enough and the customers will go away, which is the goal.
 
Back
Top