Gov. Walker vetoes repeal of railroad trespass law

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

CHamilton

Engineer
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2011
Messages
5,306
Location
Seattle
Gov. Walker vetoes repeal of railroad trespass law

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker has vetoed a provision in the new, two-year state budget that would have repealed a law that prohibited people from trespassing on railroad property.


The railroad industry had raised concerns that repealing the trespassing law would hurt efforts to prevent railroad trespass-related deaths and injuries. The measure was slipped into the state's budget proposal during deliberations last week.

Union Pacific Railroad officials were among those expressing concern about the proposed repeal, particularly at a time when trespass fatalities have increased nationally....
Walker acknowledged the safety concerns in his written veto message.

"I am vetoing this section because I am concerned that allowing people to walk across railroad tracks outside of a designated crossing impairs public safety," the governor said.

Walker signed the state's two-year, $72.7 billion budget during a ceremony held yesterday in Waukesha, Wis., where later today he will formally announce he is a candidate for U.S. president.
 
Personally I would like to have this issue studied to see if we can determine why people are putting themselves in a situation where they are likely to be hit by a train. It does not appear that the threat of punishment for trespassing is having much impact in preventing incidents and I doubt anyone is having much luck collecting payments from vegetables or corpses.
 
Good for the Gov.....

Who and why would anyone "slip the repeal" into the budget proposal? :huh:
 
The state budget, at least in WI, is frequently used to slip in policy items, often without any acknowledgement which legislator did so.
 
So they want to be anonymous? I don't blame them....what possible reason could anyone want to repeal that law?

Possibilities I can imagine......Irresponsible railfan's that want access

PI attorney's looking to fatten their wallets
 
I don't know if this particular provision was anonymously inserted, I haven't checked up on that, but some of these non-budgetary/policy provisions slipped into the budget are done so anonymously.
 
Back
Top