Have they tried turning it off and on again?WLS-TV reports signal problems at both ends of the station. Manual control of switches limit movements to one train at a time.
That bit really is eternally funny. "Just kidding!" :lol:
I ride the North Central line from Wheeling. I took the UP Northwest line and my girlfriend drove me from the station.I'd actually love to learn more about any alternative routes people took home.
Still, closer in suburbs served by the lines using Union station do have available services via Pace, CTA, and other Metra lines.
The larger problem would be with some suburbs which really have no alternate services.
See....if Meigs was still open, you could have flown to Palwaukee!I ride the North Central line from Wheeling. I took the UP Northwest line and my girlfriend drove me from the station.
I imagine people who live farther out still take an alternate Metra route as close as they can get* and then either (1) call someone to pick them up, or (2) Uber/Lyft/taxi.
I know some people going to the same station/town will split an Uber/Lyft/taxi all the way from downtown, but that's simultaneously expensive and slow, the "express"ways being anything but. :giggle:
* Rock Island for Southwest and Heritage Corridor. UP-West or possibly UP-Northwest (closer to Elgin) for Milwaukee-West. UP-Northwest for North Central, and UP-North for Milwaukee-North. None of those is ideal, but a whole lot closer to home than Union Station with no Metra service.
The article says they fell off a ladder and landed on the circuit board.Someone fell on a circuit board? As in fell asleep? Tripped and fell? Had a heart attack? That's just terribly unclear.
And, indeed, why was a software update taking place at rush hour?
The latter is my impression.This is assuming it was a computer problem (they were allegedly "ugprading the servers") and not a problem with the circuitry that controls and drives the track switches and signals.
Amtrak currently requires their dispatchers to be qualified on the physical characteristics of the territory they dispatch. This is not conducive to centralized dispatching. Most centers have local back up.All eggs in one basket? Why hasn't Amtrak set up the NEC locations to take over? Many of the Class 1s have ability to switch to other centers if there is a computer crash.
It's bizarre, but here:Someone fell on a circuit board? As in fell asleep? Tripped and fell? Had a heart attack? That's just terribly unclear.
And, indeed, why was a software update taking place at rush hour?
“They tried to do a server upgrade, sadly, in the middle of a busy day, exactly the wrong time to do it,” said Durbin said in a phone interview Friday. A workman fell off a ladder and bumped against a panel, which caused the shutdown, said Durbin, who praised Anderson’s honesty.
Well said.The article says they fell off a ladder and landed on the circuit board.
It also says Anderson blamed the problem on multiple mistakes, the main one being they decided to upgrade (or update, it isn't clear) the servers in the middle of a busy working day. Duh! The local management was probably trying to make its numbers look good by reducing overtime.
He also blamed a previous decision (trying to deflect blame to previous management?) to decentralize Amtrak's communications system and wants to recentralize it. That strikes me (as someone with 45 years experience in computer, networking and communications systems in the banking and telecom industries) as completely wrong. A properly designed and implemented decentralized system would have no single point of failure and would have automatic resiliency to cover single and many multiple outages without skipping a beat. A centralized system would be vulnerable to the entire rail network going down, instead of just Chicago. It would have been hundreds or thousands of times worse. This problem smacks of inept design or incompetent implementation or both.
Also, it should have taken only minutes (no more than half an hour, including sanity checking after a rarely performed operation) to get the system back up after it crashed, not all day.
This is assuming it was a computer problem (they were allegedly "ugprading the servers") and not a problem with the circuitry that controls and drives the track switches and signals.
Perhaps this situation is the result of years of under funding Amtrak.A properly designed and implemented decentralized system would have no single point of failure and would have automatic resiliency to cover single and many multiple outages without skipping a beat.
..the result of years of planning by Amtrak.Perhaps this situation is the result of years of under funding Amtrak.
Enter your email address to join: