NARP Meeting At L.A.

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.

WhoozOn1st

Engineer
Honored Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2007
Messages
4,281
Location
Southern California
The NARP meeting I'm attending at Los Angeles is not until Saturday, but everbody will be very interested to know that I managed to meet Amtrak CEO Joe Boardman as he arrived today to be the featured speaker at the meeting. In the course of this chance encounter we enjoyed a deep and meaningful exchange of ideas, and I have many interesting and important details to report.

Returning aboard Surfliner 785 from a very busy day of attending to highly important Amtrak Unlimited Official Business (namely riding trains), I detrained at Van Nuys, from where Alice, of the Patrick & Alice RailRiot 2000, would drive me home. Had never been to that station before, so took the opportunity to look around while Alice squabbled with the good-natured station guy about some voucher kinda crap.

As we were finally loading up her car and getting ready to go, I heard a train rumbling by. Told her "Hang on, I wanna see this freight." "Oh alright," she impatiently replied. Some people.

Turned around, and instead of a freight saw the telltale twin P42s of the southbound Coast Starlight, Train 11. Had figured it for a freight because it wasn't due in for another 56 minutes. Pretty good on time performance.

Strolling up to watch the stop evolution, I said to the nearby sleeper attendant, "Pretty good time. Good trip?" "Very good trip," he said with a smile. Looking over the train as Alice wheeled up, I noticed and observed to her "Look at that on the end. An Amfleet. This is the fourth strange consist we've seen today. Wonder what it's doing there." Sleeper attendant filled me in: "That's our president onboard!" "Boardman's on the train!?" That would tend to explain the OTP. "Yeah, that's the Beech Grove."

The helpful attendant returned to his onboard post, the highball was given, and the Starlight began pulling out for L.A.

Scolded Alice, "Don't just sit there, wave at the Beech Grove," which we both did. It was as the car passed that we spied Boardman, standing on the rear platform, grinning and waving back to us.

In that rare, fleeting moment, a melding of the minds came to pass:

"See you tomorrow, Mr. Boardman!!"

"Okay!!"

Never mind that in the cosmic intensity of the encounter I'd forgotten that today is Thursday, not Friday, and that tomorrow is Friday, not Saturday. Mere quibbles in the overall scheme of things.
 
In that rare, fleeting moment, a melding of the minds came to pass:
"See you tomorrow, Mr. Boardman!!"

"Okay!!"

Never mind that in the cosmic intensity of the encounter I'd forgotten that today is Thursday, not Friday, and that tomorrow is Friday, not Saturday. Mere quibbles in the overall scheme of things.
Sounds like you need to locate Mr. Boardman tomorrow. When his assistant asks if you have an appointment, tell him/her that indeed you do: it was set up yesterday when you met in Van Nuys. After all, he did acknowledge his willingness to meet you with a positive indication of "Okay!!" :D
 
Sounds like you need to locate Mr. Boardman tomorrow.
You might be quite right, and I'm hoping he'll make the task fairly easy by parking Beech Grove at LAUS, where I'll be heading again on Friday.

After encountering the guy I started wondering about all the odd consists seen Thursday, especially the twin P42s seen - and videoed - heading Surfliner 799. No Surfliner needs a pair of P42s, and rarely has even one. Kinda decided it must be a positioning move, like the Sounder cars currently northbound on the Starlight (somebody please get a pic), and figured 798 would have only one, the second going elsewhere after SLO. But met 798 later, and still both P42s. What gives?

Wondering if one was sent north for Boardman's Starlight in case of original power failure; maybe an engine was getting hinky. No failure, so both came back. But what do I know.

A very interesting Amtrak day around L.A., with perhaps more to follow with the weekend. I'll be on the scene.
 
Wow Talk about a surpise ending I was waiting for the deep convo... Neat that you saw Beech Grove. I wish some one knew where to find pics of the inside of Beech Grove since I don't think the layout is a matter of national security. :wacko: Enjoy the Spring Promotion!
 
Wow Talk about a surpise ending I was waiting for the deep convo... Neat that you saw Beech Grove. I wish some one knew where to find pics of the inside of Beech Grove since I don't think the layout is a matter of national security. :wacko: Enjoy the Spring Promotion!

I do! Go to railroad picture archives, find the Amtrak equipment section, and find the car there. There are some great shots of the inside of it!

cpamtfan-Peter
 
After encountering the guy I started wondering about all the odd consists seen Thursday, especially the twin P42s seen - and videoed - heading Surfliner 799. No Surfliner needs a pair of P42s, and rarely has even one. Kinda decided it must be a positioning move, like the Sounder cars currently northbound on the Starlight (somebody please get a pic), and figured 798 would have only one, the second going elsewhere after SLO. But met 798 later, and still both P42s. What gives?
Most likely one of the P42's is fresh out of the shop and is being road tested. The second one is along just in case the one just out of the shop fails. This is a common practice with engines just out of the repair shop, backing them up with an engine that has been on the road for a while.
 
After encountering the guy I started wondering about all the odd consists seen Thursday, especially the twin P42s seen - and videoed - heading Surfliner 799. No Surfliner needs a pair of P42s, and rarely has even one. Kinda decided it must be a positioning move, like the Sounder cars currently northbound on the Starlight (somebody please get a pic), and figured 798 would have only one, the second going elsewhere after SLO. But met 798 later, and still both P42s. What gives?
Most likely one of the P42's is fresh out of the shop and is being road tested. The second one is along just in case the one just out of the shop fails. This is a common practice with engines just out of the repair shop, backing them up with an engine that has been on the road for a while.
I, too, noticed the two P42s, and didn't think much of it. But I would guess the same as Alan...given the fact that I noticed one of them looked showroom-new and the other quite beat up.
 
After encountering the guy I started wondering about all the odd consists seen Thursday ...
Now that you mention it, I also saw a strange LA bound consist Thursday Apr 30. As I was passing through ABQ on the New Mexico Railrunner Express, the west bound SWC was in the station. The lineup: two locomotives, coach, baggage, coach, 2 sleepers, diner, sightseer lounge, and coach. All cars were superliners, except for the heritage baggage car.

No special cars, just a wierd arrangement.
 
After encountering the guy I started wondering about all the odd consists seen Thursday ...
Now that you mention it, I also saw a strange LA bound consist Thursday Apr 30. As I was passing through ABQ on the New Mexico Railrunner Express, the west bound SWC was in the station. The lineup: two locomotives, coach, baggage, coach, 2 sleepers, diner, sightseer lounge, and coach. All cars were superliners, except for the heritage baggage car.

No special cars, just a wierd arrangement.
There was not a trans/sleeper?

Usually cars put in front of the baggage are cars just being ferried somewhere. But having a coach in the place of the trans/sleeper is just plain odd. So after the sightseer lounge, there was only one car?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top