#2 is currently in NM heading toward El Paso. It is an hour or two behind schedule, but is scheduled to arrive in Alpine and the stops farther east without further delay, according to "Track Your Train" and transitdocs.com, gradually catching up and back on schedule by SAS.
Looking at Google Earth, east of Alpine (Brewster County is HUGE), I only see a few candidate bridges that might match the picture. Most of the bridges are either way to short or clearly NOT trestles. There are a pair about 19 and 20 miles east of Alpine (almost to Marathon) and another pair 65 and 70 miles east, almost in the next county, Pecos. The first one looks to be the best match for terrain, but doesn't really look like a trestle, more like a concrete bridge. It is hard to tell from above, but most trestles have no ballast; the ties are directly anchored to the bridge structure, so you can see through them, but other types of bridges have a pan that holds ballast with the ties embedded in it. The bridge in the picture is clearly a trestle and doesn't appear to have a pan. I'm wondering if the picture is actually a file photo of A burning railroad bridge in Brewster County, rather than a photo of THIS burning railroad bridge.
There are lots of much smaller bridges, many of them trestles. Smaller bridges are much easier to repair or replace. Also, there are a number of bridges on double-tracked sections. Some of them have separate bridges for the two tracks, or at least in one case, one track goes over a trestle and the other track, maybe 50' away has what appears to be a culvert. If the fire was on a double-track section, it would be easy (though perhaps time-consuming) to route around it.