And ask MMA about running a railroad competently. The issue isn't the trains themselves, it's that companies have been allowed to cut corners where they should not have been allowed to.Ask the people of Lac Megantic about "winning big".
As if it's only MMA. In my experience it only takes one white cloud of death to spoil your morning. I take great comfort that CP is now transporting crude oil through St. Paul. I'm sure that their track and procedures are now much better...And ask MMA about running a railroad competently. The issue isn't the trains themselves, it's that companies have been allowed to cut corners where they should not have been allowed to.Ask the people of Lac Megantic about "winning big".
Jim,Most People Don't Know How Much Hazardous Material is Passing through their Cities and Towns 24/7 Whether its by Truck/Train or Air! Progressive Cities have Created Hazardous Material By-Pass Routes that Go Around Most Areas of the City but the Rail Lines and Airports are Fixed and Can't Be Moved or Replaced without Spending Billions if not Trillions of Dollars which in Todays' Political Climate Just Ain't Gonna Happen! :help:
I didn't know that, can you expand on it (or point me in the right direction to search)?Jim,Most People Don't Know How Much Hazardous Material is Passing through their Cities and Towns 24/7 Whether its by Truck/Train or Air! Progressive Cities have Created Hazardous Material By-Pass Routes that Go Around Most Areas of the City but the Rail Lines and Airports are Fixed and Can't Be Moved or Replaced without Spending Billions if not Trillions of Dollars which in Todays' Political Climate Just Ain't Gonna Happen! :help:
I think that many people also don't realize that RR's are actually required to carry those hazardous materials. They can't refuse to transport most things.
Also interesting DoT Testimony:The major railroads enjoy monopolies in their service areas and are able to charge high prices and dictate service terms to their customers, including chemical manufacturers and distributors. In recent years, the railroads have increasingly expressed concerns about potential liability exposures involved with the transportation of TIH materials and have argued to Congress and the Surface Transportation Board (STB) that they should either receive liability relief
or be relieved of their common carrier obligation to transport TIH materials.
I'm trying to remember what Warren Buffet has had to say on this. IIRC, he's been pretty nuanced on the issue...I don't think he wants to be hauling the super-volatile stuff because of the liability, for example.Gotta wonder if some of the so-called grassroots opposition to Keystone XL is actually being orchestrated by the railroads? After all, who's the biggest loser if the pipeline gets built? ;-)
[senators] Wyden and Merkley want the NTSB, an independent federal safety watchdog, to report on the locations of oil train accidents involving smaller amounts of oil from other regions. And they want the NTSB to evaluate the risks that trains carrying crude from other regions pose to communities in Oregon and elsewhere.
As evidence of the proliferation of crude-by-rail facilities across North America, the senators pointed to these two maps, showing the industry's rampant growth in the last three years.
[Maps in original article.]
Enter your email address to join: