Two different headlines on Brightline accident

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Jul 16, 2010
Messages
4,893
NBC News: Two killed in Florida train crash after car ignores crossing gate

Fox News: 2 killed after Florida high-speed train hits car on railroad crossing north of Miami

One makes it clear where the fault lies. The other does not. Sad that some companies mislead the public so often. One has to read more than the headline to read the facts.
 
NBC News: Two killed in Florida train crash after car ignores crossing gate

Fox News: 2 killed after Florida high-speed train hits car on railroad crossing north of Miami

One makes it clear where the fault lies. The other does not. Sad that some companies mislead the public so often. One has to read more than the headline to read the facts.
I saw the NBC one and was happy they indicated, in the headline, who was at fault.
Hopefully that headline reached at least one person who will no longer consider running around the gates.
 
One makes it clear where the fault lies. The other does not. Sad that some companies mislead the public so often. One has to read more than the headline to read the facts.
That's also how most situations where a car driver hits a pedestrian/cyclist are reported: you'll often read that the victim has been struck by a car in an accident, without a mention about the driver, and whether he may be at fault (an accident happens when every reasonable step had been taken to prevent a crash: in most cases, "accidents" are actually crashes, in which the car driver is at fault).
 
Fault in auto accidents is frequently complicated--involving some negligence on the part of the driver or drivers, some negligence on the part of non-driver pedestrians and bicyclists, and some unavoidable non-negligent causes, including tire failure, sudden emergencies, animals unexpectedly crossing the road, badly engineered intersections, etc. Parsing out how much each of these causes contributed to the harm in a case is why juries are instructed on comparative fault in their verdicts.

On the other hand, car-train accidents almost always involve negligence, if not recklessness, on the part of the car at the grade crossing. Much simpler allocation of fault.
 
That's also how most situations where a car driver hits a pedestrian/cyclist are reported: you'll often read that the victim has been struck by a car in an accident, without a mention about the driver, and whether he may be at fault (an accident happens when every reasonable step had been taken to prevent a crash: in most cases, "accidents" are actually crashes, in which the car driver is at fault).
But the car driver has a chance (albeit possibly to little of one) to maneuver or brake to avoid the accident. The train cannot do anything but attempt to do full braking and pray. Moreover, going onto the tracks when the lights are on and gates are down is patently illegal everywhere.
With car vs pedestrian, it takes an investigation to determine fault, primary fault or if more than one participant is at fault.
 
NBC News: Two killed in Florida train crash after car ignores crossing gate

Fox News: 2 killed after Florida high-speed train hits car on railroad crossing north of Miami

One makes it clear where the fault lies. The other does not. Sad that some companies mislead the public so often. One has to read more than the headline to read the facts.
I don't see anything wrong with the Fox headline. It's factually correct. Only in this world of macro analysis can one extract the fault to be the trains.
 
I don't see anything wrong with the Fox headline. It's factually correct. Only in this world of macro analysis can one extract the fault to be the trains.
While the Fox headline doesn't get any information wrong, it withholds one extremely relevant part of the story.

Causation is important. This crash would not have happened if the driver had obeyed the law.

Essentially, one headline absolves the driver of any wrongdoing.
The other acknowledges how the driver's wrongdoing lead to their death and their passenger's death.

Headline 1:
"Car struck in the middle of intersection killing driver and passenger"

Headline 2:
"Car runs red light, leading to lethal crash at four way intersection."
 
Last edited:
I don't see anything wrong with the Fox headline. It's factually correct. Only in this world of macro analysis can one extract the fault to be the trains.
Not necessarily true. Look how many people in Florida that have blamed Brightline for so many deaths even though not one of them has been their fault. People unfortunately scan headlines instead of reading the articles and assume fault based on that. After all, if the Brightline train hadn't been there, or gone so fast, or had so many trains, etc, etc, those deaths would not have occurred.
 
Regardless of the headline issue maybe it is time for crossing safety commercials (education) more in line with Australia's.

That is a very sobering ad - although, I think they could have left the two yahoos in the truck out and just focused on the serious aspect of being aware of trains.

There needs to be one about driving around the barriers and/or "beating" the train.
 
The Australian video with the mom and her kids stopping on the tracks is something I see all the time. In Auburn ME there is a RR crossing with a major intersection just beyond it and people just stop on the crossing. Fortunately this line (Pan Am) just sees maybe 4 trains a day max but one is still playing Russian roulette stopping there.

Perhaps a better design would have an additional set of lights just before the crossing to prevent drivers stopping on the crossing.
 
An Aussie showed me this ad more than 10 years ago in a Youth Hostel in Seattle when I was describing my hobby traveling and photographing railroad stations. I still sometimes have the tune stuck in my head, it's direct and brilliant.



Update: Didn't realize YouTube imbeds automatically!
 
Last edited:
I have a friend who is a conductor on Brightline. Last week he was running after a Miami Heat game. Almost all of his passengers were drunk and throwing up on the cars. He said he rounded a corner on the line and saw a car stuck on the tracks and told his engineer to "get ready to stop." Low and Behold! there was a car stuck in the middle of both mains and not a grade crossing insight. The rest is in his words:
Engineer stops the train, maybe 200 feet from caking this guy.
I climb down "Hey man, this ain't no god damn road! What the f*ck!"
Call dispatch, tell him there's a car blocking both mains, they call the cops and also a tow truck and also a track inspector.
Cop shows up "Hey man, I just got back from responding to a shots fired with over 60 bullets."
Just talking sh*t with the guy.
Tow truck driver pulls up.
He has me in his truck, positioning it to extract the vehicle & also ramming the throttle so it gives him more RPM to set up the wench.
I'm thinking the whole time 'i'm a conductor, not a f*cking tow truck driver'
well, anyways, I get out of the towtruck cause he's set up & ready to pull it out.
>Gun shots maybe 2 blocks away, rapid fire.
Cop immediately hauls a** without saying a single word.
So the track guy is like "man, sh*t"
Us three idiots have to pull this thing out with a methhead right there, cause the guy never got arrested.
Get the car out, methhead walked home.
Suddenly my train attendant says "hey man, some people just barfed all over coach #4 and coach #2"
They had to move everyone out of both those coaches, lock em out.
Get to fort laud.
Half the people get off, drunk as f*ck from the miami heat game.
Start off on our merry way for all of 200ft, there's a drunk guy laying in the track.
Stop, I pull him out.
Engineer says "just let me know when he's next to our engine." and we haul a**.
(Hopefully, I censored all of the cuss words lol)
 
Not necessarily true. Look how many people in Florida that have blamed Brightline for so many deaths even though not one of them has been their fault. People unfortunately scan headlines instead of reading the articles and assume fault based on that. After all, if the Brightline train hadn't been there, or gone so fast, or had so many trains, etc, etc, those deaths would not have occurred.
That's a tort issue, not a journalistic issue.

I have a friend who is a conductor on Brightline. Last week he was running after a Miami Heat game. Almost all of his passengers were drunk and throwing up on the cars. He said he rounded a corner on the line and saw a car stuck on the tracks and told his engineer to "get ready to stop." Low and Behold! there was a car stuck in the middle of both mains and not a grade crossing insight. The rest is in his words:

(Hopefully, I censored all of the cuss words lol)
This is what Tri-Rail is for! :D
 
Back
Top