I think the VL II cubbies are longer but shallower than the VL I's. Most of the space above the corridor in the VL I's is shared by the two opposing roomettes. About half the length of each is cubby, and since the two roomettes are arranged head to tail, each gets half the length and the entire width (less the thickness of the wall) of that space.
I haven't ridden a VL II yet (maybe in May?!) but from the pictures, it looks like the VL II cubbies are longer (front-to-back) though not the full length of the roomette, but only half the width of the corridor. The two cubbies for opposing roomettes are back-to-back instead of side-by-side. This would make them only half as deep, and since they don't appear to extend the full length of the roomette, much less volume than the VL I's.
Since crumple zones seem to be an issue (or necessity) for meeting the crash-worthiness of new cars, wouldn't it make sense to put luggage racks at each end of the VL II sleepers? (Maybe I've answered my own question there.) Racks would be much more usable by many of the passengers who have trouble getting their luggage up into the overhead cubbies. It seems more difficult to get stuff up there than in typical overhead racks in coach. Maybe because the upper bed gets in the way?
All said, this is a bad time to be redesigning the VL II sleepers. Maybe useful for the VL III's or what ever they call the next single-level sleepers.
I haven't ridden a VL II yet (maybe in May?!) but from the pictures, it looks like the VL II cubbies are longer (front-to-back) though not the full length of the roomette, but only half the width of the corridor. The two cubbies for opposing roomettes are back-to-back instead of side-by-side. This would make them only half as deep, and since they don't appear to extend the full length of the roomette, much less volume than the VL I's.
Since crumple zones seem to be an issue (or necessity) for meeting the crash-worthiness of new cars, wouldn't it make sense to put luggage racks at each end of the VL II sleepers? (Maybe I've answered my own question there.) Racks would be much more usable by many of the passengers who have trouble getting their luggage up into the overhead cubbies. It seems more difficult to get stuff up there than in typical overhead racks in coach. Maybe because the upper bed gets in the way?
All said, this is a bad time to be redesigning the VL II sleepers. Maybe useful for the VL III's or what ever they call the next single-level sleepers.