transit54
Conductor
It's pretty rare to find a book on passenger rail in the United States (the only other one I can think of is New Departures, which was mentioned a while back on here), so I was pretty excited when Waiting on a Train by James McCommons, came out. The author spent a year riding various Amtrak trains around the country, interviewing players in passenger rail and railroad policy and learning about Amtrak.
All in all, I thought it was an interesting book. I enjoyed it, though I didn't always agree with the author's opinions. He spent a good portion of the book drawing sharp lines between railfans and those who have a realistic view of passenger rail policy. I don't view the two categories as mutually exclusive. A lot of the material was stuff I already knew from experience or this forum, but there were also plenty of interesting information and perspectives from various people involved in railroading.
What really irritated me though is that McCommons discussed, in depth, every single state that funded Amtrak except for Vermont. In the entire 285 page book, he didn't mention Vermont or its two trains even once. Meanwhile, he rode every long distance train and at least one train in every state that funded Amtrak (except Michigan, though he mentioned them several times). I didn't expect him to take either the Ethan Allen or the Vermonter, but I felt pretty slighted that he didn't even mention that Vermont has or funds two Amtrak trains. My calculations indicate that Vermont actually funds Amtrak more than any other state on a per-capita basis.
All in all, I think its a worthwhile read, and especially those relatively new to train travel will learn quite a bit. McCommons comprehensively covers the issues that Amtrak is up against. Overall I'd recommend it, and besides, a solid book on Amtrak comes along only once in a blue moon.
Has anyone else read Waiting on a Train yet? I'd be interested in hearing others thoughts.
All in all, I thought it was an interesting book. I enjoyed it, though I didn't always agree with the author's opinions. He spent a good portion of the book drawing sharp lines between railfans and those who have a realistic view of passenger rail policy. I don't view the two categories as mutually exclusive. A lot of the material was stuff I already knew from experience or this forum, but there were also plenty of interesting information and perspectives from various people involved in railroading.
What really irritated me though is that McCommons discussed, in depth, every single state that funded Amtrak except for Vermont. In the entire 285 page book, he didn't mention Vermont or its two trains even once. Meanwhile, he rode every long distance train and at least one train in every state that funded Amtrak (except Michigan, though he mentioned them several times). I didn't expect him to take either the Ethan Allen or the Vermonter, but I felt pretty slighted that he didn't even mention that Vermont has or funds two Amtrak trains. My calculations indicate that Vermont actually funds Amtrak more than any other state on a per-capita basis.
All in all, I think its a worthwhile read, and especially those relatively new to train travel will learn quite a bit. McCommons comprehensively covers the issues that Amtrak is up against. Overall I'd recommend it, and besides, a solid book on Amtrak comes along only once in a blue moon.
Has anyone else read Waiting on a Train yet? I'd be interested in hearing others thoughts.