This is more of a case of "I am sick and tired of hearing bad arguments against rail travel", but I'm fed up with the old "If demand spiked hard for rail travel we couldn't make up the shortage in cars for a long time" argument. So, let's assume that something causes a hard spike in rail travel demand on corridors. I can think of one or two catalysts; the easiest to envision is something bad in the Middle East, but the cause is irrelevant. Demand spikes hard. Where could Amtrak round up compatible cars without a new car order if there were a proverbial gun to their head? Note that I'm assuming that one-off PV cars and the like just aren't in the mix (as much fun as it would be to see California forced to jam old SP cars into service, I'll have to pass on that indulgence), but I'm wondering about things such as the batch of Santa Fe Hi-Levels sitting outside St. Louis, ex-Mexican RR cars, etc. that could be refurbished on a relatively short turnaround (i.e. less than the 2-3 years needed to design, bid out, and receive a full new shipment of ordered cars). Alternatively, assume that Amtrak isn't placing the order, but rather that it's coming from the various state-run services which suddenly get shoved into the black. The other (perhaps slightly uneasy) question in this is whether there is somewhere that cars could be obtained from (such as BR MKIIs that're being cycled out of service and/or MKIIIs).
Basically, on a timeframe of up to one year/eighteen months, how many cars could be rounded up and pressed back into service?
Basically, on a timeframe of up to one year/eighteen months, how many cars could be rounded up and pressed back into service?