San Diego Santa Fe Depot is so close an the Trolley serves both. Wasted added stop to me.
Saves a few minutes for anyone who lives further north. I've seen quite a few people get on and off there. So it doesn't seem like much of a waste to me.San Diego Santa Fe Depot is so close an the Trolley serves both. Wasted added stop to me.
maybe they should ditch the Depot stopthen?Saves a few minutes for anyone who lives further north. I've seen quite a few people get on and off there. So it doesn't seem like much of a waste to me.
That would be bad for business travelers, it's right by downtown.maybe they should ditch the Depot stopthen?
Or Boston and Back Bay.It's like saying "Why does Amtrak stop at WAS and NCR, you can take the Metro between them"
Also nearby parking much better.
Maybe they should add a stop around Ditmars Blvd. in Queens, where they cross high above the end of the 'N' subway line, and near Grand Central Parkway, for easier access to those driving in from Long Island. One problem with that is the height of the structure at that point, approach to the Hell Gate Bridge, so maybe a little further where it gets near ground level...and a stop near Pelham on the Hell Gate Line, presumably at one of the 4 MNRR stations to be built on that line.
The OG station there was "Capitol Beltway", and it was just a short bit further north of today's NCR. Greenbelt is over on the WMATA Green Line/CSX/Camden Line.New Carrollton (Greenbelt originally until it was I believe moved and rebult) for DC
The OG station there was "Capitol Beltway", and it was just a short bit further north of today's NCR. Greenbelt is over on the WMATA Green Line/CSX/Camden Line.
No new stops in Queens. All in the Bronx.Maybe they should add a stop around Ditmars Blvd. in Queens, where they cross high above the end of the 'N' subway line, and near Grand Central Parkway, for easier access to those driving in from Long Island. One problem with that is the height of the structure at that point, approach to the Hell Gate Bridge, so maybe a little further where it gets near ground level...
A separate project will build a station accessable to Metro-North and LIRR trains in Sunnyside Yards. Construction won't begin until East Side Access is up and running.No new stops in Queens. All in the Bronx.
There is a design and space set aside for it in the ESA project but the actual construction of the Sunnyside station is not funded and it is not clear when and if it will be funded and by whom. The station is not in the Sunnyside Yard but on the main line alignment around where F interlocking is. It is present in the track diagram for the modified Harold and F track layout incorporating both ESA, Amtrak bypass tracks and modified Sunnyside Loop access resulting from ESA..A separate project will build a station accessable to Metro-North and LIRR trains in Sunnyside Yards. Construction won't begin until East Side Access is up and running.
Gate is as far as it is possible and it is already 60Hz upto Gate. Converting all of Harold Interlocking to 60 Hz is way more expensive than adding third rail on two tracks from Harold to Gate. Sunnyside is unlikely to get converted to 60Hz in the foreseeable future. There are more important things to spend funds on.Am not completely familiar with this area. Instead of extending the third rail toward gate why not change the 25 Hz to 60 Hz toward Harold as far as possible ? Seems that would cost less and not need another DC substation that is on the plans ? I have no idea how far the 25 Hz for Sunnyside goes but IMO this extending the 60 Hz is in line with finally converting SSY to 60 Hz ?
Enter your email address to join: