Why would you want to watch TV when there is so much to see out the window?Has anyone ever tried to receive TV on the train? I got a USB tuner for my laptop a little while back and am going to try it on my next trip in a couple of weeks.
I have a hand held tv (analog, useless now) that I used along the Auto Train route. I found that I could get a decent signal as we approached and moved away from major cities (Richmond, Jacksonville, etc.). When the train was right near downtown, the signal strength was about what I could get at home with the rabbit ears adjusted properly.Has anyone ever tried to receive TV on the train? I got a USB tuner for my laptop a little while back and am going to try it on my next trip in a couple of weeks.
I have to use a directional tuner at home to pick up signals. Would you have to move the laptop to continue to receive?Has anyone ever tried to receive TV on the train? I got a USB tuner for my laptop a little while back and am going to try it on my next trip in a couple of weeks.
Yeah, scenery this and scenery that. If I really wanted to see something I would go backpacking and look off a mountain that no one can see off of unless they hike up there and earn it. Here is the deal, Amtrak has great prices between Atlanta and New Orleans and I like good coffee, good food and drinking from a plastic cup while walking down the street. I am not taking this train so I can grope the window.Why would you want to watch TV when there is so much to see out the window?Has anyone ever tried to receive TV on the train? I got a USB tuner for my laptop a little while back and am going to try it on my next trip in a couple of weeks.![]()
The antenna that came with it is a remote collapsible upright. It can pick up a few stations inside at home, I just wonder if anything can get through the train car.I have to use a directional tuner at home to pick up signals. Would you have to move the laptop to continue to receive?Has anyone ever tried to receive TV on the train? I got a USB tuner for my laptop a little while back and am going to try it on my next trip in a couple of weeks.
To be fair, there are a few Amtrak routes that pass through mountains which are many, many miles from any roads or trails--the only way to see them actually is by train, unless you're willing to hike and/or raft for days off-trail.Yeah, scenery this and scenery that. If I really wanted to see something I would go backpacking and look off a mountain that no one can see off of unless they hike up there and earn it. Here is the deal, Amtrak has great prices between Atlanta and New Orleans and I like good coffee, good food and drinking from a plastic cup while walking down the street. I am not taking this train so I can grope the window.Why would you want to watch TV when there is so much to see out the window?Has anyone ever tried to receive TV on the train? I got a USB tuner for my laptop a little while back and am going to try it on my next trip in a couple of weeks.![]()
A quick check of Travelocity and Greyhound finds that the only price that beats Amtrak is a 21 day advance non refundable Greyhound and even then its only 18 bucks you are saving. On top of that Greyhound is usually pretty nasty and the seats are just as cramped as the airlines. Airlines are wanting about 200 RT before taxes. Its pretty easy to find a low bucket 58 dollar fare for ATL-NOL on Amtrak. Now since my brother is traveling with me we have invested in a roomette which can easily be had for 47 bucks between these cities and we get all three meals for both of us (if it is on time at ATL). Airlines can beat Amtrak on time between these cities, but other than that Amtrak is holding all the cards.Not to be sarcastic or holier than thou, but some of the tree top airlines have cheap fares andGreyhound(LOL)also probably can get you to the Big Easy (no nurt feelings for natives in
NOL please!)cheap if not quick!
That's a great price, since you'd almost break even on meals with just one person in the roomette. With 2 passengers you're coming out far ahead!Its pretty easy to find a low bucket 58 dollar fare for ATL-NOL on Amtrak. Now since my brother is traveling with me we have invested in a roomette which can easily be had for 47 bucks between these cities and we get all three meals for both of us (if it is on time at ATL). Airlines can beat Amtrak on time between these cities, but other than that Amtrak is holding all the cards.
That's interesting. With analog and living near Lexington, KY I could only pick up Lexington stations. Now, with digital I can also pick up some of the Louisville stations, 70 miles away! I do have a little altitude where I live but not so much it should make much of a difference.Considering that digital TV is far less powerful than analog, and you're going to be a distance from cities - I'd say no.Here, 50 miles from Atl., analog got about 8 stations. Now that we're all digital: 3 (2 PBS, 1 GPTV) no news, sports, soaps, or anything.
And if anything moves in the room, the pix locks up for a few seconds.
So, in a moving, metal car, miles from the transmitter?
What are your chances of that working?
Because the keep turning off the scenery right after sunset. :angry:Why would you want to watch TV when there is so much to see out the window?![]()
For $39.95 you can get the much bigger accessible "H" room 15 days before train departure if no one else has booked it and every other room is booked.That's a great price, since you'd almost break even on meals with just one person in the roomette. With 2 passengers you're coming out far ahead!Its pretty easy to find a low bucket 58 dollar fare for ATL-NOL on Amtrak. Now since my brother is traveling with me we have invested in a roomette which can easily be had for 47 bucks between these cities and we get all three meals for both of us (if it is on time at ATL). Airlines can beat Amtrak on time between these cities, but other than that Amtrak is holding all the cards.
Exactly. Next time you are on a train look around and see how many people are not looking out of the window, even if the scenery is amazing.Also, I think it is important to remember that not everybody who posts on here has the same enthusiasm for trains as we do. They might appreciate some aspects, but could careless about the scenery even if they are riding the CZ through Glenwood Canyon. I think it is important to respect all types when they post. We informally represent rail travel, and we need to do better than we did with this person.
AlohaExactly. Next time you are on a train look around and see how many people are not looking out of the window, even if the scenery is amazing.
But some nights, they turn on the moon!Because the keep turning off the scenery right after sunset. :angry:Why would you want to watch TV when there is so much to see out the window?![]()
I seem to recall that a certain California town has just recently turned OFF the "moon"........ :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:But some nights, they turn on the moon! biggrin.gif
Even if you can get a good enough signal through the windows, it is likely not to work very well, if at all, when the train is moving at much speed. The 8-VSB modulation scheme for ATSC (digital) TV broadcasting was not designed to handle any significant doppler shift. It has been known since the ATSC format specs were defined in the mid-90s that it would not work well for digital tuners and TVs in moving cars or RVs. of course, there is also the issue of having to do a channel scan as you move through different areas, but if you know the physical RF channel of the local stations and have a tuner that allows manual entry, you can try to get stations one at a time. There is a mobile TV standard that has been grafted on top on 8-VSB which does allow reception while moving, but stations will use this for low Rezz SD broadcasts to cell phones or portable devices. Of course, the mobile TV broadcasts embedded in the ATSC signal will take away bandwidth from the HD sub-channel, but the picture quality of HD broadcasts have been going downhill for years as stations cram in more sub-channels.Has anyone ever tried to receive TV on the train? I got a USB tuner for my laptop a little while back and am going to try it on my next trip in a couple of weeks.
If it is known that it does not work well in moving cars or RV's how does things like Direct TV work in planes? :huh: I assume Direct TV broadcast digitally, and I have yet to see an RV moving as fast as a 757!Even if you can get a good enough signal through the windows, it is likely not to work very well, if at all, when the train is moving at much speed. The 8-VSB modulation scheme for ATSC (digital) TV broadcasting was not designed to handle any significant doppler shift. It has been known since the ATSC format specs were defined in the mid-90s that it would not work well for digital tuners and TVs in moving cars or RVs.
Wow....amen to that.Why would you want to watch TV when there is so much to see out the window?Has anyone ever tried to receive TV on the train? I got a USB tuner for my laptop a little while back and am going to try it on my next trip in a couple of weeks.![]()
Ka and Ku satellite broadcasts using DVB-S protocol are an entirely different beast than a 6 MHz wide ATSC broadcast signal.If it is known that it does not work well in moving cars or RV's how does things like Direct TV work in planes? :huh: I assume Direct TV broadcast digitally, and I have yet to see an RV moving as fast as a 757!![]()
And if you travel in December, they turn on the Christmas lights.But some nights, they turn on the moon!Because the keep turning off the scenery right after sunset. :angry:Why would you want to watch TV when there is so much to see out the window?![]()
![]()