Joel N. Weber II
Engineer
No Boston sleeper?IIRC it would've been Road Power, Boston Bag, Lounge, Boston Coach, New York Coach, Diner, New York Sleeper, New York Baggage, which is in line with what Alan recalls.
No Boston sleeper?IIRC it would've been Road Power, Boston Bag, Lounge, Boston Coach, New York Coach, Diner, New York Sleeper, New York Baggage, which is in line with what Alan recalls.
The Boston sleeper was on the head end out of BOS and the lounge car was on the rear. The sleeper disappeared about (within 6 months or so) the same time as the stub appeared. Probably helped in deciding to run the stub. There was much ado about putting the two trains together I think Amtrak got tired of the switching circus that the crews made out of it.No Boston sleeper?IIRC it would've been Road Power, Boston Bag, Lounge, Boston Coach, New York Coach, Diner, New York Sleeper, New York Baggage, which is in line with what Alan recalls.
I wonder if the 1999 derailing helped lead up to the sleeper you mentioned disappeared? See news article!The Boston sleeper was on the head end out of BOS and the lounge car was on the rear. The sleeper disappeared about (within 6 months or so) the same time as the stub appeared. Probably helped in deciding to run the stub. There was much ado about putting the two trains together I think Amtrak got tired of the switching circus that the crews made out of it.No Boston sleeper?IIRC it would've been Road Power, Boston Bag, Lounge, Boston Coach, New York Coach, Diner, New York Sleeper, New York Baggage, which is in line with what Alan recalls.
Only in the last few years of the run through was the sleeper on the head end. While I'm still not home and able to pull out my notes from old trips, I did look up a trip report on OTOL that I did in 2002, and the consist listing that I provided at that time does indeed show that the Boston sleeper used to be on the rear prior to the demise of Express Trak.The Boston sleeper was on the head end out of BOS and the lounge car was on the rear. The sleeper disappeared about (within 6 months or so) the same time as the stub appeared. Probably helped in deciding to run the stub. There was much ado about putting the two trains together I think Amtrak got tired of the switching circus that the crews made out of it.No Boston sleeper?IIRC it would've been Road Power, Boston Bag, Lounge, Boston Coach, New York Coach, Diner, New York Sleeper, New York Baggage, which is in line with what Alan recalls.
Doubtful, since the derailment had nothing to do with the process of combining/seperating the two trains. Not to mention that the derailment occured several years before Amtrak decided to stop the run through. I truly believe that this had as much to do with the costs of combining/seperating, the slow crews that peformed the tasks, and the issues with freezing during the winter months.I wonder if the 1999 derailing helped lead up to the sleeper you mentioned disappeared? See news article!The Boston sleeper was on the head end out of BOS and the lounge car was on the rear. The sleeper disappeared about (within 6 months or so) the same time as the stub appeared. Probably helped in deciding to run the stub. There was much ado about putting the two trains together I think Amtrak got tired of the switching circus that the crews made out of it.No Boston sleeper?IIRC it would've been Road Power, Boston Bag, Lounge, Boston Coach, New York Coach, Diner, New York Sleeper, New York Baggage, which is in line with what Alan recalls.
Thanks Alan, I too had doubts because of the time-line but really didn't know. The only reason that I even thought of the derailment is because I had picked up my wife at the Rensselaer station on that particular day. She was returning from LA. The derailment was the same train she arrived on but the derailment occured after she got off and we were on our way home from the station. (the newspaper article I provided a link to was wrong when they said the train was approaching the station. It was after it arrived) We later heard about it on the evening news!Doubtful, since the derailment had nothing to do with the process of combining/seperating the two trains. Not to mention that the derailment occured several years before Amtrak decided to stop the run through. I truly believe that this had as much to do with the costs of combining/seperating, the slow crews that peformed the tasks, and the issues with freezing during the winter months.I wonder if the 1999 derailing helped lead up to the sleeper you mentioned disappeared? See news article!The Boston sleeper was on the head end out of BOS and the lounge car was on the rear. The sleeper disappeared about (within 6 months or so) the same time as the stub appeared. Probably helped in deciding to run the stub. There was much ado about putting the two trains together I think Amtrak got tired of the switching circus that the crews made out of it.No Boston sleeper?IIRC it would've been Road Power, Boston Bag, Lounge, Boston Coach, New York Coach, Diner, New York Sleeper, New York Baggage, which is in line with what Alan recalls.
Oops. This is what happens when you reply to things at 12 in the morning and you've had a rough day.No Boston sleeper?IIRC it would've been Road Power, Boston Bag, Lounge, Boston Coach, New York Coach, Diner, New York Sleeper, New York Baggage, which is in line with what Alan recalls.
Enter your email address to join: