Sorry if this has already been posted, but it looks like Amtrak has started the process to find a firm to provide "programmatic support for the development and execution of the Texas High Speed Rail Project." The document mentions at top speed of 205MPH for a 90 minute trip. I don't have a link to the full document, these are just from two small screenshots.
Amtrak Initiates RFQ process for Texas High Speed Rail
- Thread starter Cal
- Start date
Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:
I'm surprised and happy that this project is still breathing.
I assume that since it is an Amtrak project now, Texas Central's plans to use JR Shinkansen equipment are probably out the window.
I assume that since it is an Amtrak project now, Texas Central's plans to use JR Shinkansen equipment are probably out the window.
I read about it here:
https://www.kbtx.com/2025/02/27/amt...vance-houston-dallas-high-speed-rail-project/
Amtrak appears to be gaining momentum as it moves forward with plans to develop a high-speed rail line between Dallas and Houston, launching a procurement process to select a Delivery Partner for the project.
Texas Rail Advocates first reported the latest development, which marks a significant step in advancing the long-planned rail line.
The Texas High-Speed Rail (HSR) Project promises to provide a 90-minute trip between the Lone Star State’s two largest cities, reaching up to 205 miles per hour along a 240-mile route that includes a stop in the Brazos Valley.
According to Amtrak, the delivery partner will be responsible for providing “advice, leadership, and support” to facilitate the execution of the project. According to the request, this firm will not design or construct the rail system, however, it will play a key role in program management, construction oversight, stakeholder coordination, procurement, and quality management.
Amtrak says the partner must be “aware of and willing to enter into incentive/disincentive compensation structures to ensure the Project is delivered in the most innovative and cost-efficient manner.”
As a Texan, I'm from Missouri on this one!( " Show Me!)
I'll believe it when I see it!
Considering the current State of Politics, both State and National, and the Huge Amount of Money involved, I wouldn't bet my House on this Scheme ever seeing the Light of Day!
I'll believe it when I see it!
Considering the current State of Politics, both State and National, and the Huge Amount of Money involved, I wouldn't bet my House on this Scheme ever seeing the Light of Day!
Maglev
Conductor
Dare I be optimistic and think that the current administration sees the real estate value of intercity passenger rail?
Last edited:
I think that there's a small chance they do--at least in relation to private companies like Brightline. I could see this Texas project moving forward in some weird way, like if Duffy & the Trump Admin. insisted that Brightline (can't think of any other "real" private rail operator in the U.S. who would be close to equipped to do this) become a major partner in the project in order for it to receive funding, etc.
Obviously conjecture. But with success of Brightline Florida + Brightline West underway, I'd be a little surprised if they tried to, say, pull back the Federal dollars they received for the BL West project. I really could see them pushing Brightline/any sort of private model (or at least a Amtrak-private partnership model) but we'll see.
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2019
- Messages
- 197
I forget the specifics but something I read after this announcement led me to believe that Amtrak is still committed to use of Shinkansen technology. The Japanese have invested a lot in the project, including after Amtrak involvement started.
emoji. Take that as you will. I also believe today DOGE has reached the FRA.George Harris
Engineer
First, IMHO, the Japanese know more about high-speed rail equipment, track, and operation than the various and sundry European and others that claim knowledge thereof will even begin to understand 10 years from now. So, I certainly hope that they stay with the Shinkansen equipment. Another not exactly incidental factor, due t6 the width of the Shinkansen cars, a platform built to give an ADA acceptable gap between platform and car floor will pass AAR standard width freight cars and equipment without need for any special games such as gantlet tracks. (The proper word is gantlet. A gauntlet is an armored glove. A gantlet is a tight passage, usually painful.)
Second, the Texas HSR is in a natural "sweet spot" for distance for a high-speed rail segment. By the time you deal with gate to gate you are essentially equal to rail in time and without the hassles inherent in air travel. Along with this, the terrain and geographt between end points is made for rail. Relatively flat, and without multiple intermediate population center or other major constraints.
Second, the Texas HSR is in a natural "sweet spot" for distance for a high-speed rail segment. By the time you deal with gate to gate you are essentially equal to rail in time and without the hassles inherent in air travel. Along with this, the terrain and geographt between end points is made for rail. Relatively flat, and without multiple intermediate population center or other major constraints.
Given the challenges with CAHSR it’s right to be skeptical. I can see Amtrak’s interest in this particular market though for the reasons you mentioned. Also with the current politics you may have some of the powers that be a bit more sympathetic since it’s Texas.
cirdan
Engineer
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2011
- Messages
- 3,921
maybe Musk thinks a Hyperloop would be a better alternative? Good opportunity to put everything on hold while consultants make more money doing more feasability studies.
cirdan
Engineer
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2011
- Messages
- 3,921
why should passing freight cars even be an issue? Surely this is a dedicated passenger corridor and there are existing freight corridors that will continue to exist.
