rickycourtney
Conductor
After so many years of Amtrak's second "rainbow era" with Phase V locomotives, Phase III Viewliner II cars, and Phase VI Superliners and Amfleet... I'm hoping that Phase VII will be a return to a more consistent look.
Me too!After so many years of Amtrak's second "rainbow era" with Phase V locomotives, Phase III Viewliner II cars, and Phase VI Superliners and Amfleet... I'm hoping that Phase VII will be a return to a more consistent look.
Not bad but I liked the original better...This one?
I agree...and especially dislike all the individual state schemes. If they are Amtrak, they should all be in uniform Amtrak scheme. If another agency operates them, then they should not be in Amtrak scheme...After so many years of Amtrak's second "rainbow era" with Phase V locomotives, Phase III Viewliner II cars, and Phase VI Superliners and Amfleet... I'm hoping that Phase VII will be a return to a more consistent look.
Personally, I like the unique schemes! It gives them identity I guess.I agree...and especially dislike all the individual state schemes. If they are Amtrak, they should all be in uniform Amtrak scheme. If another agency operates them, then they should not be in Amtrak scheme...
I am sure most railfans would agree with your view...part of the hobby is spotting all the differences great and small in equipment. If all were identical, it would be boring to some...Personally, I like the unique schemes! It gives them identity I guess.
I disagree with you on this one. The states are paying the money to purchase the equipment and operate the trains... and they are entitled to paint them however they want. I don't blame most of them for wanting to have a brand unique from Amtrak's national network. Heck, even Amtrak has a unique brand for Acela to distance it from the equipment used on the national network.I agree...and especially dislike all the individual state schemes. If they are Amtrak, they should all be in uniform Amtrak scheme. If another agency operates them, then they should not be in Amtrak scheme...
I agree with you. Just because Amtrak is contracted to run a service does not make it an Amtrak service. Different liveries for different service is standard practice all over the world even when run by the same outfit. It is mostly done for differential branding identities.I disagree with you on this one. The states are paying the money to purchase the equipment and operate the trains... and they are entitled to paint them however they want. I don't blame most of them for wanting to have a brand unique from Amtrak's national network. Heck, even Amtrak has a unique brand for Acela to distance it from the equipment used on the national network.
And I wonder how many people have already gotten on a corridor train instead of an LD train by accident WITH different liveries, surely it would increase if they looked identicalI agree with you. Just because Amtrak is contracted to run a service does not make it an Amtrak service. Different liveries for different service is standard practice all over the world even when run by the same outfit. It is mostly done for differential branding identities.
Usually it is harder to get on an LD train by accident.And I wonder how many people have already gotten on a corridor train instead of an LD train by accident WITH different liveries, surely it would increase if they looked identical
This is a sad comment on people in the NE( especially Jerseyites), the fact that they cant tell an Acela or other Amtrak Train from a NJT one is sad!Usually it is harder to get on an LD train by accident.
But legitimate problems that exist in station along the NEC is among Acela, Regional and Commuter Service. Those would probably be much more severe if everything had the same livery.
I have seen such issues arise at stations like Metropark where due to local dispatching variance on a particular day trains might come in in different order from normal, confusing people. Acela conductors have to announce repeatedly, and Regional ones a little less so in order to keep passengers with invalid tickets on those trains from getting on. During inbound commute hours it gets tough when the platform is jam packed with NJT riders and an Acela appears out of sequence. Some small amount of misboardings happen from time to time, but in general they are rare.
Okay, I see your point, there. There should be a clear difference in cases like that, to help prevent that. Commuter rail should have no Amtrak reference at all.Usually it is harder to get on an LD train by accident.
But legitimate problems that exist in station along the NEC is among Acela, Regional and Commuter Service. Those would probably be much more severe if everything had the same livery.
I have seen such issues arise at stations like Metropark where due to local dispatching variance on a particular day trains might come in in different order from normal, confusing people. Acela conductors have to announce repeatedly, and Regional ones a little less so in order to keep passengers with invalid tickets on those trains from getting on. During inbound commute hours it gets tough when the platform is jam packed with NJT riders and an Acela appears out of sequence. Some small amount of misboardings happen from time to time, but in general they are rare.
I think they do, they all clearly state Amtrak, but have nice liveries that match their regions to give them identity.Okay, I see your point, there. There should be a clear difference in cases like that, to help prevent that. Commuter rail should have no Amtrak reference at all.
But services like the San Joaquins or the San Diego trains, or the North Carolina trains are not commuter trains, but really part of the Amtrak national network, and their livery should reflect that.
Sorry. Amtrak California trains are not national network trains. That is a fact, not an opinion.Okay, I see your point, there. There should be a clear difference in cases like that, to help prevent that. Commuter rail should have no Amtrak reference at all.
But services like the San Joaquins or the San Diego trains, or the North Carolina trains are not commuter trains, but really part of the Amtrak national network, and their livery should reflect that. Those trains are sold by, staffed by, and managed by Amtrak, and their livery should reflect that. If the state agency owns the equipment used, they should limit any markings to something like an equipment trust plate, like railroads used to in places. If the state agency wants to take over their operation, then let them, and remove all references to Amtrak. JMHO...
Usually it is some visitor from places like Texas who are befuddled by things like trains that are the ones that make those mistakes. Not the localsThis is a sad comment on people in the NE( especially Jerseyites), the fact that they cant tell an Acela or other Amtrak Train from a NJT one is sad!
And new commuters ;DUsually it is some visitor from places like Texas who are befuddled by things like trains that are the ones that make those mistakes. Not the locals
This is an unusual windmill to tilt at. If the states pay for the rolling stock, they have the right to paint it in whatever scheme they please regardless of where one books the tickets. It is vastly preferable to have them bookable through Amtrak's website where travelers can easily book trains for a journey mixed between state service and national trains. Discouraging that through silly requirements about paint schemes to satisfy railfans isn't going to happen.Okay, I see your point, there. There should be a clear difference in cases like that, to help prevent that. Commuter rail should have no Amtrak reference at all.
But services like the San Joaquins or the San Diego trains, or the North Carolina trains are not commuter trains, but really part of the Amtrak national network, and their livery should reflect that. Those trains are sold by, staffed by, and managed by Amtrak, and their livery should reflect that. If the state agency owns the equipment used, they should limit any markings to something like an equipment trust plate, like railroads used to in places. If the state agency wants to take over their operation, then let them, and remove all references to Amtrak. JMHO...
Good point. "Money talks ". If Amtrak doesn't care, why should I?This is an unusual windmill to tilt at. If the states pay for the rolling stock, they have the right to paint it in whatever scheme they please regardless of where one books the tickets. It is vastly preferable to have them bookable through Amtrak's website where travelers can easily book trains for a journey mixed between state service and national trains. Discouraging that through silly requirements about paint schemes to satisfy railfans isn't going to happen.
It looks like Siemens has released what the Charger will look like in a model. They did the same thing with the ACS-64.
See here: http://www.mainlinediesels.net/imgs/SiemensCharger_Profile_BottomLeft.jpg
They also did the same thing with the ACS-64: http://www.railcolor.net/imgs/content/model_siemens_acs2.jpg
Side note: EMD has also revealed the final look of the new F125. See here: http://www.progressrail.com/cda/files/4546792/7/2-sidersENG_LTR_proof_rev5RevH_Screen.pdf
Already been posted, and we have another thread on it toonot sure if this was posted : [US] Amtrak celebrates 50th birthday with special (Charger) designs
Suffice it to say it is not Amtrak's money that is being used to paint State's cars and engines. Sometimes even Amtrak's engines are painted using state funds, like the P32ACDMs of Empire Service.Good point. "Money talks ". If Amtrak doesn't care, why should I?
Enter your email address to join: