neroden
Engineer
The Washington locomotives will be freed up. California is adding to its fleet.
It'll free up all but one of the locomotives leased for the Surfliner.The Washington locomotives will be freed up. California is adding to its fleet.
it works fine for meThat's the same link that's been posted three times now, but thanks.
Which link? Thanks.Correct on first unit being a IDOT unit , not Caltrans, in link it has deliveries schedule after two units go to Pueblo.
NGEC Slideshow, Slide 2Which link? Thanks.Correct on first unit being a IDOT unit , not Caltrans, in link it has deliveries schedule after two units go to Pueblo.
The Charger order of 33 locomotives for the Midwest is significantly more than the IL, MI, MO corridors are currently using. Don't know exactly how many P-42s might be freed up in the Midwest for use elsewhere, but it is not 33 of them. The additional locomotives will be available for expanded service frequencies and probably will be used on the 110 mph corridors to put 2 locomotives on each trainset for better acceleration.With these new Chargers coming on-line, Amtrak should have an additional 33 P-42's available in Chicago (who knows what shape they are in), but what about the Amtrak engines in California and Washington state? CalTrans has 20 Chargers on order and WasDOT has 8. Will this free up an additional 28 Amtrak engines for LD service? I know both CalTrans and WasDOT have some of there own engines, will any of these be retired or are they looking at the Chargers as a way to get rid of any P42's they are leasing from Amtrak?
Thanks.NGEC Slideshow, Slide 2Which link? Thanks.Correct on first unit being a IDOT unit , not Caltrans, in link it has deliveries schedule after two units go to Pueblo.
Maybe Virginia will see a bunch of F59PHIsAs discussed earlier in this thread, the locomotives that will be freed up in California are F-59PHIs. With the Chargers becoming the main locomotive for the Midwest and West coast corridor services, if Amtrak decides to keep their F-59PHIs, might see them get moved east for use on some of the eastern corridor services. Probably won't be enough Chargers in revenue service until late 2017 or 2018 for the F-59s to start getting freed up.
Maybe if they go back to leasing rather than buying outright, this would circumvent the challange of rasing cash upfront. I believe Siemens actually owns a loco leasing business so that shouldn't be a problem. I know in the long run leasing is far more coytl than buying, but difficult times can call for extraordinary measures.It sounds like Amtrak has quite a while to exercise its options on the Charger order... but hopefully Amtrak will shake up money to do so sometime in 2017, to keep the production line going and alleviate the pending shortage of P42s.
That's a good question. I've been wondering the same thing myself.They look nice and seeing a return to strobes makes things interesting. Speaking of strobes, I wonder why Amtrak removed the strobes on the P40s?
It transitions the visual profile from the locomotive to the high-level California Cars, prevents locomotive exhaust from blowing against and through the front door of the first passenger car, and reduces wind drag. Since some of the other states will also be pulling high level cars (eventually), I have no idea why they don't have a similar feature. Perhaps it's something that can be easily retrofitted in the future.In the renderings, why the heck does the CalTrans loco have a sloped fin on the back of its roof but the others don't?
I'm guessing the artist made a coloring error and that's really the front of the first car.In the renderings, why the heck does the CalTrans loco have a sloped fin on the back of its roof but the others don't?
oops, I now see I am mistaken. That thing really is there.I'm guessing the artist made a coloring error and that's really the front of the first car.In the renderings, why the heck does the CalTrans loco have a sloped fin on the back of its roof but the others don't?
The California locos will always operate with 16" tall cars. Such is not the case for the others perhaps, though I suspect that at least the IDOT ones will mostly do so too. But if they have a significant chance of operating with single level cars too it probably does not make sense to put that structure on the roof.In the renderings, why the heck does the CalTrans loco have a sloped fin on the back of its roof but the others don't?
It's quite possible, since the testing is going to have to be done for AAF, perhaps MD will get aboard.Well, OK. I am not sure about Maryland. But AAF most certainly will.
Good question. I wish I knew.Maybe they asked for it.
The strobes on school buses don't cause seizures, so why would the strobes on a locomotive if they had a similar frequency?
Enter your email address to join: