I think he's working on understanding the issues, interviewing his management, and then getting his organization in place. Supposedly he has brought in 5 retired senior ex NS execs as 'consultants' to help do this (this includes former COO Manion). If I was an Amtrak manager, I wouldn't be too comfortable right now.
Makes sense to work on the big issues now rather than operating details. That will come. I believe much of September Boardman was still around as Moorman was off on a prearranged trip.
I've heard the same Palmland.
Amtrak has always been top-heavy, especially in the NEC, and there have been meetings already about this. From what I've heard, he feels there are too many VPs and he would like the number reduced.
The sentiment of many front line employees has been that the company protects its management, giving yearly bonuses, while drastically cutting employees. There are many, many redundant management jobs, and many managers are rightfully worried.
It will certainly be interesting!
Well, looks like Amtrak might get in line with the rest of the industry in the management structure afterall.
I 100% disagree. VIA rail Gave me extremely impressive customer service on a train that was 6 hours late.As someone who has worked in customer service for forty years, I can tell you that it is impossible to give good service if you do not have a good product delivered on time. Without costly infrastructure additions, the best way to improve the product is with better on-time performance, and this would be accomplished by negotiating with the freight railroads for better dispatching. Perhaps it is realistic for us to look to Mr. Moorman to try to achieve this.
Rather than simply "sharpening our lobbying effort" to hit up Congress for a larger appropriation, Coscia says, the board thought it would be better to spend more time convincing stakeholders that the railroad serves the public well with the limited resources that it has.
"No one invests in a company that isn't well run," Coscia says. "And our feeling was that a lot of progress had been made at Amtrak under Joe Boardman's tenure, and [his retirement] was an opportunity to build on that and create a very, very well-run company."
......
Moorman doesn't know exactly how long his stay at Amtrak will last. Still, he'll be there long enough to tackle some key issues necessary to make the organization function more effectively.
"I think we need to continue and there has been progress at Amtrak to really focus on building a strong culture centered around safety first, and then on customer service," he says.
.....
But few passenger railroads in the world make a profit, Moorman adds. So while Amtrak continues to drive down its operating deficit, it can't "economize" to a point of hurting the quality of the product, he says.
"One of the things we're going to pay a lot of attention to going forward is the customer experience," he continues. "We'll balance the customer service needs with our ability to be more efficient and effective, particularly in those areas that don't directly affect the customer."
.....
With the Gateway and Acela Express programs underway, Amtrak needed an executive leader with the experience to manage capital projects of such magnitude, according to Coscia.
"Forty years of under-investment in passenger rail has created some glaring things that need to be built, both in infrastructure and in rolling stock," he says. "Getting the money is difficult; almost equally difficult is overseeing and managing the project so that its delivered on time and on budget."
Ouch, that rumor is new to me.This would really be an acid test because the action on the Star was actually taken behind Mr. Boardman's back by the CFO according to several rumbles heard at various places.
Bombardier outsourcing streetcar components to Mexican factories which are unable to meet quality standards comes to mind, from just a year or two ago...If that is the case then this would be a test to see if the CFO runs the company or Mr. Moorman does. many a company has been destroyed by mindless accountants running the company into ground. They are really good at it as a matter of fact.
Coscia may be on the correct track. Maintenance appears being shorted causing many late originations and enroute failures. We have no idea for sure but it seems that Amtrak suffers from both shortage of maintenance personnel and more importantly lack of parts. Every monthly performance report shows the overhaul maintenance of cars delayed for lack of parts. Even more important is the lack of parts for loco work at Beech Grove especially the replacement of traction trucks.Rather than simply "sharpening our lobbying effort" to hit up Congress for a larger appropriation, Coscia says, the board thought it would be better to spend more time convincing stakeholders that the railroad serves the public well with the limited resources that it has.
"No one invests in a company that isn't well run," Coscia says. ......
Doing more reasonable things with food service = good. Explicitly disowning the profitability goal = defying Congress* for the feel-good sake of defying Congress = bad. IMHO. The mirror image of "words are cheap" is that certain words can be damned expensive too.I think a good test of Mr. Moorman would be to see if he disowns the "Food Service profitable within x number of years" pledge and starts doing more reasonable things with food service. I always look for real action. Words are always cheap. I have very little faith in words not backed by action. But it is reasonable to wait upto a year to see what unfolds before coming to any conclusions, this way or that.
This, exactly.Doing more reasonable things with food service = good. Explicitly disowning the profitability goal = defying Congress* for the feel-good sake of defying Congress = bad. IMHO. The mirror image of "words are cheap" is that certain words can be damned expensive too.I think a good test of Mr. Moorman would be to see if he disowns the "Food Service profitable within x number of years" pledge and starts doing more reasonable things with food service. I always look for real action. Words are always cheap. I have very little faith in words not backed by action. But it is reasonable to wait upto a year to see what unfolds before coming to any conclusions, this way or that.
Disowning the (food service) profitability goal - which needs to be done because it is both misguided and unattainable - and defying Congress are not necessarily the same thing. Granted, antagonistic defiance of those who hold the purse strings is a very bad idea, but that's not what is being suggested; It would be far worse to continue to mislead that same Congress with a strategy which is inherently unworkable. George ("glide path to self sufficiency") Warrington tried that once, and David Gunn had to come clean up the mess.Doing more reasonable things with food service = good. Explicitly disowning the profitability goal = defying Congress* for the feel-good sake of defying Congress = bad. IMHO. The mirror image of "words are cheap" is that certain words can be damned expensive too.I think a good test of Mr. Moorman would be to see if he disowns the "Food Service profitable within x number of years" pledge and starts doing more reasonable things with food service. I always look for real action. Words are always cheap. I have very little faith in words not backed by action. But it is reasonable to wait upto a year to see what unfolds before coming to any conclusions, this way or that.