Yeah, a lot of the time it seems like trains I am on switch mains at almost every crossover to run around freights.It's always busy but perhaps there is maintenance underway. Usually with double-track CTC they're able to go around slow freights.
We're now an hour and twenty minutes late. The conductor said we met 46 freight trains between Portland and Seattle. We stopped four times in the last mile before King Street Station. I will be arriving at my hotel in Bellingham after the front desk closes, so I will be using their late check-in procedure.
Yeah, around the grain port in Kelso. Washington state paid for it.
Kalama is a grain port. I think of Kelso as a lumber town.Yeah, around the grain port in Kelso. Washington state paid for it.
I've not had any delays when riding the Cascades. BNSF seems to do a great job with dispatching (unlike NS, which is abysmal).Yeah, a lot of the time it seems like trains I am on switch mains at almost every crossover to run around freights.
BNSF usually does a great job of handing Amtrak there.
I believe Amtrak took UP to federal court for not complying with the contract, and the judge made it a court order. If UP is found not conforming to the court order then someone from UP will be called to the court and if the judge isn't satisfied of situation then someone from UP may be jailed till court order is complied with. Sounds harsh, but Judges do have their ways!I've not had any delays when riding the Cascades. BNSF seems to do a great job with dispatching (unlike NS, which is abysmal).
Yes... ....and I'm not really sure how we're going to get NS to comply. The evidence is that NS has created the problem in a nontraditional manner. Traditionally, dispatchers were instructed to illegally delay passenger trains; we know the procedure for stopping that with the courts, the STB, etc.I've not had any delays when riding the Cascades. BNSF seems to do a great job with dispatching (unlike NS, which is abysmal).
Wow. And I thought that line didn’t have too many freights. What do I know
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...=bfGaUembwA8&usg=AOvVaw0EfK9FeUMO2liHAnS_QSXfWow. And I thought that line didn’t have too many freights. What do I know
I think that's because there wasn't room for the Interstate to be built entirely on one side of the long-existing rail line.Before Portland, the tracks travelled right down the median of I-5!! I thought it was weird—3 lanes of traffic on either side of the train!
Have you seen Metrolink on the I-10?Before Portland, the tracks travelled right down the median of I-5!! I thought it was weird—3 lanes of traffic on either side of the train!
Also several Chicago "L" lines, built during the 1950's or '60's, I think.Have you seen Metrolink on the I-10?
View attachment 24509\
Or the Texas Eagle just north of Austin?
(Go to 6:30 of this video)
Also several Chicago "L" lines, built during the 1950's or '60's, I think.
View attachment 24510
And I believe plans still call for Brightline to run down the I-4 median to Tampa.
Enter your email address to join: