Diverting attention away from negative political commentary for a moment....
Well, moving the South side to electric traction would be the easier of the two exercises, with the Providence Line being a matter of setting up maintenance facility for electric trains and getting electric trains,
The whole thing would be achievable in ten years given adequate funding, at least if this were India.
This article has some more details:
https://www.wbur.org/bostonomix/2019/11/04/mbta-regional-rail-electric-trains
The improvements will start on three lines. One resolution the board adopted instructs T officials to prepare immediately to launch electrified pilot programs on the Providence/Stoughton Line, the Fairmount Line, and a section of the Newburyport/Rockport Line connecting Boston to Lynn, Revere, Chelsea and Everett, sometimes referred to as the "environmental justice line."
They are basically talking of doing the whole thing in 15-20 years.
Here is the study on which all this is based:
https://www.mbta.com/projects/rail-vision#alternatives
The Commission appears to support something between
Alternative 5 and
Alternative 6, starting with the South side as I surmised above. They do throw in a Northern segment too, but that will involve more effort than the South side part.
My suspicion is as a starter they ought to work towards
Alternative 3 and upgrade from there towards
Alternative 6 opportunistically. They will probably get the electrification profile of
Alternative 5 out of it all that when the dust settles in 10-15 years.
Now back to the normal gripes...
![Big Grin :D :D]()