I guess that's a pretty good reason to go with tilting trains. I guess only Talgo was hungry enough to submit for what will be a relatively small order.
When you get down to it and the investigations are complete, you will probably find a tidy sum of money changing hands somewhere.
Is there anything specific that makes you questions this transaction? I know there is a lot of corruption in Illinois, but I had not noticed anything lately in Wisconsin.
Nothing other then my general assumption whenever no-bid job and foreign concern appear in the same deal. Especially with Asian companies- which I know Talgo is not. Bribing is the way certain cultures do these things. If you want proof, you'll have to look elsewhere for I have none.
ALC, for once, and it pains me a lot to say this, Vokris does have a point- there are times when bidding is not worth what it costs.
However... Talgo is not the only company who builds tilting trainsets. The UAC TurboTrain was a pendular design. Bombardier's Acela and LRC sets tilt. I'm pretty sure the Pendalinos are Italian (Fiat comes to mind) and not Talgo. Since there are other possible designs, I question the logic. So while Volkris does make a valid point, I disagree that it applies to this instance.