Maybe it wasn't a bridge, but the BNSF Omaha Sub? That's hard by the river in some places and might be impacted by levee work. We all know how journalists can misinterpret railroad related issues.
I mentioned the bridge as example of what flood waters were coming to Omaha, but as I said originally, it was a BNSF one at Sioux City, not at Omaha. Sorry my post was confusing. I saw a photo of the downed bridge in water-see railwayage.com article “BNSF Suffers South Dakota Bridge Collapse” for a drone picture and maps.The “rare mileage” for this detour was from Ashland to Plattsmouth. I believe this route is about 19 miles shorter than looping through Omaha…
What bridge does BNSF have at Omaha?
They used to use the UP bridge there to get to Council Bluffs, and then run down their line on the Iowa side to rejoin their mainline at Pacific Junction. Other roads also had trackage rights on the UP bridge. The only other rail bridge across the Missouri River at Omaha, is the long out of service, Illinois Central bridge.
UP thru freights cross the Missouri a few miles north over their former C&NW bridge at Blair…
Based on what sales it is allowing and what it isn't it looks like it will stay on the BNSF Creston Sub straight over to Plattsmouth instead of going up the BNSF Omaha Sub to Omaha. It crosses the Missouri at Plattsmouth on the Creston Sub anyway.
That routing makes sense to skip Omaha while still serving Lincoln and Creston. Plus it's really the BNSF main where the Omaha Sub is more secondary.
Thinking more about it...it is a lucky thing, I suppose, that Omaha has not suffered a similar fate like Phoenix, or like Boise did, with the host railroad deciding to truncate part of their line as a thru route....if they did, Plattsmouth could have become another "Maricopa"...#6(23) has skipped Omaha having going straight from Lincoln to Plattsmouth. Looks to have made up an hour as well.
Enter your email address to join: