Ryan
Court Jester
One of the reasons that I'm know I've found the right woman, is she's agreeable to a round the country trip on Amtrak as a Honeymoon.
We're thinking of going WAS-CHI-(LAX or SAC)-SEA, spending a few days in Seattle (perhaps with an excursion up to Vancouver) and then returning either SEA-CHI-WAS or SEA-CHI-NYP-WAS.
For the trip out, I'm thinking that the way to go is a 2 zone trip from CHI-SEA (I can get from WAS to CHI on the CL for under $400 in a bedroom, so to me it isn't worth the 20,000 points to make it into a 3 zone trip and start as WAS).
Amtrak.com shows that CHI-LAX-SEA is a valid routing, but it doesn't show CHI-SAC-SEA - is that not a valid routing? I recall reading something that the number of routings that the website would show was artificially limited, so it would be possible to call in and obtain more than was listed on the website. Is this correct?
Also, on the return trip, if I list SEA-NYP, it gives me the routing via CHI and WAS and then a NE regional, however, if I list CHI-WAS the reverse of that (LSL, Regional) isn't listed as available - any clues why not?
Any suggestions on preferred routings? We're looking at the April/May timeframe of 2010, so we've got a good amount of time to plan (and keep earning points). As it stands now, I'm at about 20k and anticipate earning a little over 2k a month off the AGR card and Amy has a shade under 5k - the hope for her is to buy 10,000 points for her in '09 and '10 and then have her earn the difference to get the 30k required for a 2 zone bedroom.
Any other ideas on how the overall operational concept can be improved upon? Are there better locations for taking a 2-4 day "break"? Seatte seemed good from a flexibilty in routing and things to see and do perspective, but I'm open to ideas.
Not really on the table (for no good reason) is completing the loop by going LAX-NOL-WAS. Is this something that I should be considering as well?
We're thinking of going WAS-CHI-(LAX or SAC)-SEA, spending a few days in Seattle (perhaps with an excursion up to Vancouver) and then returning either SEA-CHI-WAS or SEA-CHI-NYP-WAS.
For the trip out, I'm thinking that the way to go is a 2 zone trip from CHI-SEA (I can get from WAS to CHI on the CL for under $400 in a bedroom, so to me it isn't worth the 20,000 points to make it into a 3 zone trip and start as WAS).
Amtrak.com shows that CHI-LAX-SEA is a valid routing, but it doesn't show CHI-SAC-SEA - is that not a valid routing? I recall reading something that the number of routings that the website would show was artificially limited, so it would be possible to call in and obtain more than was listed on the website. Is this correct?
Also, on the return trip, if I list SEA-NYP, it gives me the routing via CHI and WAS and then a NE regional, however, if I list CHI-WAS the reverse of that (LSL, Regional) isn't listed as available - any clues why not?
Any suggestions on preferred routings? We're looking at the April/May timeframe of 2010, so we've got a good amount of time to plan (and keep earning points). As it stands now, I'm at about 20k and anticipate earning a little over 2k a month off the AGR card and Amy has a shade under 5k - the hope for her is to buy 10,000 points for her in '09 and '10 and then have her earn the difference to get the 30k required for a 2 zone bedroom.
Any other ideas on how the overall operational concept can be improved upon? Are there better locations for taking a 2-4 day "break"? Seatte seemed good from a flexibilty in routing and things to see and do perspective, but I'm open to ideas.
Not really on the table (for no good reason) is completing the loop by going LAX-NOL-WAS. Is this something that I should be considering as well?