Is it possible for the Coast Starlight to go to and from Seattle to San Diego. There are routes on other long distance trains where the train would go into a dead-end station and then back up back onto the mainline. What are your thoughts?
It is physically possible. The Surfliners go through from Santa Barbara (Goleta) and San Luis Obispo to San Diego every day, although those run push/pull. And there are plans to create access to the station from the south across US 101, making it a through station.Is it possible for the Coast Starlight to go to and from Seattle to San Diego. There are routes on other long distance trains where the train would go into a dead-end station and then back up back onto the mainline. What are your thoughts?
I think the Surfliner is powered on both ends so the reversing of the consist is not necessary -Is it possible for the Coast Starlight to go to and from Seattle to San Diego. There are routes on other long distance trains where the train would go into a dead-end station and then back up back onto the mainline. What are your thoughts?
They did? I rode a number of times in the 90s and it was always a cross platform transfer at LA.Through cars to San Diego ran again in the 1990’s for a number of years as well.
So you want to arrive in Vancouver even later than 11:45pm the through Cascades 516 from Portland did?Extending the other end to Vancouver BC seems more desirable to me, but that could be because I live in PDX and go to BC often.
Yeah, maybe not. Maybe what I really want is a second Cascades thru to BC at a more reasonable hour.So you want to arrive in Vancouver even later than 11:45pm the through Cascades 516 from Portland did?
And you survived? I understand Union Bagel got closed for health code violationsExactly, regarding the easy connection your going to want get off the train for the 60-90 mins anyway. I used to enjoy a bagel and coffee at Union Bagel back in the day. The thru cars would help the mobility impaired but it really is a easy connection.
Not to mention there is no Commissary in SD, and the crew is LA based, etcIt is physically possible. The Surfliners go through from Santa Barbara (Goleta) and San Luis Obispo to San Diego every day, although those run push/pull. And there are plans to create access to the station from the south across US 101, making it a through station.
Also, when the Starlight is early, it is not infrequently wyed on arrival, the incoming train pulling forward to San Diego Junction, them backing in, making the subsequent move to the 8th St Coach Yard easier.
And FYI, the California Zephyr is wyed at Denver every day.
The main issues not making it a through San Diego train are not LAUS' physical plant. The issues are of schedule (too long, with very late arrival and very early departure), and the fact that the Starlight's maintenance base is LA's 8th St Coach Yard. San Diego has no equivalent facilities. Plus it drastically shortens the amount of time available to turn the train.
Then there's the little matter that wying the train in San Diego would require a move through the US Marine Corps Recruit Depot (the Marines' west coast boot camp) in the middle of the night. Eliminating the move through the Recruit Depot was a small part of the reasoning behind converting the San Diegans to push/pull.
Not happening. LAUS currently being stub ended is the least of it.
FYI, in Amtrak's earliest years the Starlight was officially a San Diego-Seattle train. There was a through coach and sleeper carried on the connecting San Diegan. The through cars stopped pretty early on, by 1973 or 74, IIRC.
And you survived? I understand Union Bagel got closed for health code violations
I just wish they would run the early morning train up to Vancouver. Before Covid, the only option was a 2pm train that gets to Vancouver very late, and then a 6am train on the way back.Extending the other end to Vancouver BC seems more desirable to me, but that could be because I live in PDX and go to BC often.
Extended 500, the 8:20 am Portland departure would get to Vancouver at 4:20 pm, assuming a 30 minute dwell in Seattle and 4 hour running time Seattle-Vancouver. Pair it with an extended 507, leaving Vancouver at 1:25 pm, allowing a 4:25 Vancouver-Seattle running time and a 30 minute dwell in Seattle for the current 6:10 departure time.I just wish they would run the early morning train up to Vancouver. Before Covid, the only option was a 2pm train that gets to Vancouver very late, and then a 6am train on the way back.
I don't think it makes sense to run the Starlight over the border, though. Amtrak has very few options up there for servicing cars or swapping staff. It makes sense to turn in Seattle.
The whole Cascades route should receive more service, I believe there was only 5 round trips PDX-SEA pre-covid.Extended 500, the 8:20 am Portland departure would get to Vancouver at 4:20 pm, assuming a 30 minute dwell in Seattle and 4 hour running time Seattle-Vancouver. Pair it with an extended 507, leaving Vancouver at 1:25 pm, allowing a 4:25 Vancouver-Seattle running time and a 30 minute dwell in Seattle for the current 6:10 departure time.
That would give decent times in Vancouver for Portland riders in addition to the kind of horrendous ones of 517/518.
Now for them to resume Cascades service to Vancouver at all, then both pre-COVID trains, then a third train, BNSF and CBSA willing.
That long out of service time has to be one of the most ridiculous overkills of all time. Basically the derailed train was overspeed at the curve connecting back into the Point Defiance main. You can be sure after this no one operating a train would miss this speed restriction again. The line should have gone back into service as soon as the cleanup was completed.There were briefly 5 Cascades when the Point Defiance cutoff opened then closed in the wake of the Nisqually wreck. BNSF has made using the Point Defiance Cutoff a condition of adding additional service beyond 4 Cascades and the Starlight because single track sections of the Point Defiance line make it a capacity constrained bottleneck. The new 5th train came off within a month or so after the wreck.
I agree.That long out of service time has to be one of the most ridiculous overkills of all time. Basically the derailed train was overspeed at the curve connecting back into the Point Defiance main. You can be sure after this no one operating a train would miss this speed restriction again. The line should have gone back into service as soon as the cleanup was completed.
Three trains a day between Van, BC and Seattle would allow a cycle that would terminate in Seattle for servicing every other night. It would be Day 1 > SEA > VAC > EUG > Day 2 > EUG > VAC > SEA. By coincidence, three trains a day was the original GN Internationals service (with a fourth train for mail and express and all stops).Extended 500, the 8:20 am Portland departure would get to Vancouver at 4:20 pm, assuming a 30 minute dwell in Seattle and 4 hour running time Seattle-Vancouver. Pair it with an extended 507, leaving Vancouver at 1:25 pm, allowing a 4:25 Vancouver-Seattle running time and a 30 minute dwell in Seattle for the current 6:10 departure time.
That would give decent times in Vancouver for Portland riders in addition to the kind of horrendous ones of 517/518.
Now for them to resume Cascades service to Vancouver at all, then both pre-COVID trains, then a third train, BNSF and CBSA willing.
Washington DOT did not come out of all this looking like a particularly competent bureaucracy. Its main motivation appeared to be posterior covering to the max instead of figuring out how to restore service. But then they had nothing to lose really even if nothing ran. Thank our stars that they retained the Talgo 6s until they could substitute other equipment instead of simply discontinuing all service for the duration until they got PTC and Siemens rolling stock, or something absurd like thatThat long out of service time has to be one of the most ridiculous overkills of all time. Basically the derailed train was overspeed at the curve connecting back into the Point Defiance main. You can be sure after this no one operating a train would miss this speed restriction again. The line should have gone back into service as soon as the cleanup was completed.
Would be nice for catching a cruise out of Vancouver. Cut out an expensive overnight in Seattle.Extending the other end to Vancouver BC seems more desirable to me, but that could be because I live in PDX and go to BC often.
Enter your email address to join: