Hi zephr17:
You say modest demand for sleeper accommodations. I thought sleeper demand was high, but shortage of cars along with high demand was what was driving up sleeper rates. Thanks for your suggestions.
Bob
In the general scheme of things, demand for sleepers as an absolute
is small. In fact, there are a whole lot of people who are not aware one can still travel long distance in a sleeper. They think that had gone the way of the stagecoach, a charming artifact of the past. The market pretty much consists of a small band of die-hard rail travelers, people who will not or cannot fly, and some curious who want to try out rail travel.
On the California Zephyr serving major markets at the Bay Area, Denver, and Chicago, there are a total of 26-32 roomettes (depending on how many roomettes in the transdorm are released to revenue inventory, 26 is the roomette count in 2 standard sleepers), 10 Bedrooms, 2 Family Rooms, and 2 Accessible Rooms. That is a total capacity of 70 to 82 adults and 4 small children if every room was booked to full occupancy, which never happens, there are always a good number of rooms with only one passenger.
There are 40-46 accomodations available each day, total. Now think about how many First Class airline seats are available each day SFO/OAK/SJC-ORD/MDW, DEN-ORD/MDW, DEN-SFO/OAK/SJC. An offhand guess is that number would be bigger than 46, probably a lot bigger than 46.
It doesn't take huge demand to fill those 46 daily accommodations. Pretty modest demand will do it and does.
Expanding capacity to meet that modest demand would allow sleeper prices to fall from their current stratospheric levels and would encourage the curious, many of whom are likely deterred from following through once they see what the prices are. It could serve to expand the market. Although gaining consistency in customer service and improving on time performance and reliability would also be necessary to retain those new customers.