Metra Electric Rider
Engineer
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2016
- Messages
- 2,230
Microwaves? I thought they only had convection ovens onboard?
Just curious - meals from microwaves vs. meals from convection ovens. Is the end result any different? Sorry to say that I don't know enough about meal preparation to know the answer! Thanks.Microwaves? I thought they only had convection ovens onboard?
Add Traditonal Diners to the Long List of Vanishing Amenities on Amtrak LD Trains!Just found this in my Google suggestions. I can't read the article as I am not a subscriber, but I could read the comments. Most are suggesting that this is a watershed moment and nothing is as long lasting as a temporary change...View attachment 17296
I am beginning to see the light! Thanks very much for that explanation. I guess that is why I like to heat up a small slice of leftover pizza in the toaster oven and not in the microwave. Takes longer but tastes better.They cook in completely different ways...convection ovens are a standard oven, with fan forced air circulation to even out the temperature, and speed up cooking times. Microwaves use electrical radiation to vibrate the molecules of the food, and heat from within. They are faster than convection ovens, however, they don't 'brown' the foods, and unless they are timed carefully, can ruin the texture of the food...it can come out like rubber..
Some foods can be browned by using special dishes inside the microwave that heat up for that purpose, but it's an art to master...
Microwaves? I thought they only had convection ovens onboard?
I think this is a good step. It removes a lot of people - OBS employees, from COVID harm's way. Passengers should be able to sacrifice a little bit of their comfort for making lives easier for others.
I had actually been wondering how Amtrak Diners are consistent with for example, California's lockdown rules. Now that possible disconnect goes away. It is essentially going to a take-out/delivery service instead of table service, as has been done at restaurants in most states.
As I recall, they did not reduce the price of ticket on the eastern trains when they switched from full diner to flex dining. Why would they do that on the western trains, even for a temporary switch? Oh, and it's not a $4 item if the SCA brings it to your room. Consider the service fee.If this was the same food just taken out to be eaten in my room, I would be ok with that. Or, alternatively, if they were reducing the rate substantially by the same grade they reduced the food quality by handing out heated TV dinners.
But this is not what they do! You are still paying for a $40 dinner with your rate, but you are handed a $4 item instead. That is my problem.
I think you should really be paying more than the fare at normal times to cover the risks that the people running trains are putting up with just to enable you to travel. I guess my priorities are on different things than yours.But this is not what they do! You are still paying for a $40 dinner with your rate, but you are handed a $4 item instead. That is my problem.
Just curious - meals from microwaves vs. meals from convection ovens. Is the end result any different? Sorry to say that I don't know enough about meal preparation to know the answer! Thanks.
No, it seems to me that the contemporary flex entrees are microwave heated.They can be. Many of the “chef inspired” entrees were just warmed in the convection oven I think... I can’t imagine a Lamb Shank tasting that good from a microwave.
On the other hand, I’ve had microwaved food better than the contemporary dining which I believe is convection oven?
All airline food, even first class, is all prepared on the ground and reheated in flight in convection ovens.No, it seems to me that the contemporary flex entrees are microwave heated.
All airline food, even first class, is all prepared on the ground and reheated in flight in convection ovens.
I believe that even in traditional dining cars, all of the meals except the steaks and maybe the omelets are precooked and heated in a convection oven. And I wouldn't be surprised if the omelets were made from eggs in a bottle. Back in the days of "chef-inspired" entrees, some of those precooked meals were pretty good.
The domestic first class [airline] meals I’ve had are pretty good. Not as good as Amtrak full service, but way better than contemporary meals.
That's what I would expect. Which means that there's hope that Amtrak management could still salvage the contemporary flex dining concept. It seems that the real cost savings is in reducing the number of on-board service personnel. These savings would still be realized with better quality entrees and more choice. They could increase choice without having excess inventory costs by allowing for meals to be pre-ordered at the time of reservation, or any point after that. That would also allow for the provision of kosher, halal, and various special dietary needs. For the short eastern trips, at least, there's no real need for full dining service, the problem is the food they're dishing up is lousy, and there's little for the coach passengers.
If this was the same food just taken out to be eaten in my room, I would be ok with that. Or, alternatively, if they were reducing the rate substantially by the same grade they reduced the food quality by handing out heated TV dinners.
But this is not what they do! You are still paying for a $40 dinner with your rate, but you are handed a $4 item instead. That is my problem.
I guess my priorities are on different things than yours.
I’ll be honest I wasn’t concerned in the least about the Zephyr. They had a legitimate operational situation with a two week quarantine. If Amtrak furloughed anybody right now they’d get really bad press. Also I recall this stated by Anderson at a congressional hearing this or last year may not be a perfect quote “I do believe there are certain routes that Amtrak should always operate - like the Builder, like the Zephyr, like the Coast Starlight..” The Zephyr isn’t on the hit list, and if you want to eventually run an “experiential” service, and the five year plans indicate they do, the Zephyr has to be in your top three if not top two choices of trains you are thinking for such a service. At this point any of that is likely a few years away given the present situation, but still the Zephyr isn’t on the chopping block.I’m personally glad to see the Zephyr restored.... I had a legitimate concern it would never operate beyond Denver again.
You have a lot more faith in Amtrak and Anderson’s words than I do. But like I said, glad it came back on schedule.
Not a good time to Start Learning the Job on the Fly!( Pun intended!)No need to worry about Anderson's words anymore. William Flynn is the CEO now.
Don't get me wrong I have disagreements just as you do about decisions that were made during his tenure (and some that I agree with such as the focus on safety management and improving OTP) but I think for the most part he has done what he has said and not told outright lies. I do think there are long distance routes that were (and may still be) a target. I would imagine Flynn is going to follow on the same path as Anderson that the board has set so I'm sure the corridor vs. long distance debate will continue. But I just don't feel the Zephyr was ever on the chopping block...just my opinion. I'm sure Flynn's job is going to be quite a bit different than he anticipated having to start out during this COVID-19 situation. His job has morphed from likely just continuing on what Anderson started to having to rebuild the railroad after this crisis.You have a lot more faith in Amtrak and Anderson’s words than I do. But like I said, glad it came back on schedule.
Enter your email address to join: