If someone gets upset because the natural movement of the train causes a man (or woman's) arm to accidentally touch their spouse/partner's arm, they have more issues than the LSA can solve with a simple meal seating placement.
Maybe they should put on a burlap bag to protect against such touching.If someone gets upset because the natural movement of the train causes a man (or woman's) arm to accidentally touch their spouse/partner's arm, they have more issues than the LSA can solve with a simple meal seating placement.
Manny T....I notice you are always wearing a hat in your posts.It's today folks. Not yesterday. Then people wore hats and removed them. Or didn't wear hats to make a statement (JFK: I'm young, and I'm not Ike).
Today hats are a fashion accessory. Wear it forward. Wear it backwards. Wear it all the time. It's clothing. It's fun. It's how we live.
Asking someone who is wearing a hat as a fashion accessory to remove it is like asking someone to remove a piece of their clothing. I don't think it's right.
You always have the option of NOT eating in the dining car, if you find your companions objectionable for any reason.
I highly recommend this book, which expands on this idea quite a bit (expands on it enough for a full book, obviously!).Or didn't wear hats to make a statement (JFK: I'm young, and I'm not Ike).
The voice of reason.What they are doing does not affect me or my physical comfort one iota, so I mind my own business.
You know me so well.But I guarantee she won't be running for President because if she did she'd have to associate with those nitwits who are, and she's too sensible to do that.
And how about bringing back a little Dining Car Music; stuff that is smooth and low volume-think Fashion Show in North By Northwest
I realize it is Amtrak policy but having 2 tables for basically dining car storage, 1 table for crew, and 1 table for the LSA paperwork really takes alot of class away from the dining car. It's great that the employees want to chat when on their meal break, but allowing it to take place in the diner is tacky in my opinion. VIA Rail Single level cars have every table set. The LSA never sits, and I've never seen a crew member eating in the Diner. So it can be done.There are 18 tables in a Superliner diner. Two tables are the mise en place and one table is the crew table. The mise en place are necessary because there simply is not enough counter space in the pantry for all the set-ups, silverware trays, stacks of napkins and condiments, bread baskets and such.
I realize it is Amtrak policy but having 2 tables for basically dining car storage, 1 table for crew, and 1 table for the LSA paperwork really takes alot of class away from the dining car. It's great that the employees want to chat when on their meal break, but allowing it to take place in the diner is tacky in my opinion. VIA Rail Single level cars have every table set. The LSA never sits, and I've never seen a crew member eating in the Diner. So it can be done.There are 18 tables in a Superliner diner. Two tables are the mise en place and one table is the crew table. The mise en place are necessary because there simply is not enough counter space in the pantry for all the set-ups, silverware trays, stacks of napkins and condiments, bread baskets and such.
I do not blame the crews at all for this... this is Amtrak policy and standard procedure.
It's against Amtrak policy for the crew to have any of their personal belongings stored in view of the passengers in the diner. I do see this from time to time when I'm on the train though and I do immediately correct it. The LSA's stuff, paperwork, grip etc., any of their jackets or parkas are not supposed to be stored or out during meal periods.To me, it is unprofessional and potentially sloppy when the Diner Crew puts all their "stuff" on display at an otherwise usabale table; check me if I'm wrong (and I doubt I am) but you never would have seen this in pre-Amtrak operations.
Sure was not enforced in May. I heard the whole conversation badmouthing another crew member. Also, not sure why the conductor needed to take a table as well but lets tick off another table out of service. There were plenty of people wanting to eat that a waiting list had to be created for lunch. People were turned away and told to put their name on the list. With all the talk about cost and subsidies, do we really need crew / conductors taking up revenue real estate? If anything, use the tables in the SSL.I realize it is Amtrak policy but having 2 tables for basically dining car storage, 1 table for crew, and 1 table for the LSA paperwork really takes alot of class away from the dining car. It's great that the employees want to chat when on their meal break, but allowing it to take place in the diner is tacky in my opinion. VIA Rail Single level cars have every table set. The LSA never sits, and I've never seen a crew member eating in the Diner. So it can be done.There are 18 tables in a Superliner diner. Two tables are the mise en place and one table is the crew table. The mise en place are necessary because there simply is not enough counter space in the pantry for all the set-ups, silverware trays, stacks of napkins and condiments, bread baskets and such.
I do not blame the crews at all for this... this is Amtrak policy and standard procedure.
There is only supposed to be one or two crew persons eating at at time. Everyone isn't supposed to be eating at the same time although this is only lightly enforced or not at all if there is not supervisor onboard.
A few years ago an Amtrak manager was onboard a train and while eating in the diner overheard the crew badmouthing their jobs and Amtrak. Shortly after all crew were told they now had to eat their meals in their rooms or a coach seat. A crew table would no longer be allowed in the diner. This lasted about a year before it was chagned. That's when the policy was lightened up to allow one or two crew at a time to eat in the diner again.
Enter your email address to join: