Wow. Amazing. I have been thinking about the same thing recently. A company with a private ca that might just hold for or 5 bedroom suites. There might be a common area for dining and lounging. I wonder if people would pay the big bucks necessary for first class rail accommodations like that?
Primarily restrictions on where PV's may be coupled to/uncoupled from trains. Must be an originating/termination station, few or no intermediate stations. Increase in the fees charged.I sure would. Frensic, what are the restrictions management has put on private railcars? The reins seem pretty tight. I think I'm dreaming of Amtrak going privatized.
Privatization means the end of Amtrak as we know it along with most if not all the network trains. Anderson’s and Trump administrations dream.
Maybe a 2 day week first class only CA Zephyr type train would survive and some semblance of the Auto train for a while. Australia is one example only 1 day a week Ghan and it’s for tourists in first class only, coach was removed from the train a few years ago. So in that regard one might get their first class tourist travel experience but not a useful transportation system. 100 percent not the way I’d like to see it here. Amtrak does serve a purpose in rural and flyover country.
Attachments and link just an interesting FYI.
https://www.seat61.com/Australia.htm
If the private railroads lost $$$ on pax service prior to May 1, 1971 ... why would anyone think it would be any different today? No, Amtrak is subsidized because it -- and almost all public transit -- could not exist otherwise. Amtrak's naysayers have got to realize it is an important part of national transportation needs/wants and deserves far more public funding than it receives currently. Its better trains are often sold out and need more rolling stock, staffing, and scheduling on existing routes plus some that haven't seen regular pax service in quite awhile.
The type of luxury service being contemplated here could exist within the Amtrak framework only if there is a significant enough market willing to pay enough to cover all costs for it. Canada has shown there might be north of the border, at least twice weekly. Still, its flagship Canadian loses money.
Perhaps if given time to grow, a similar US service could grow to break-even status, but the product has to be far above anything Amtrak has ever offered. The market for such service won't tolerate what most Amtrak pax do. Is the upscale, "pampered" pax rail market large enough to make it work? My guess is many potential riders would take a wait-and-see attitude, so it would take a few years to really grow (if it did).
I also wonder if establishment of such a product might not prompt cancellation or rollback of other Amtrak long distance routes. Personally, I'd rather see increased Amtrak funding used to grow the current offerings, and make them better. Let private enterprise invest and provide the very luxurious American Orient Express-type service using its own rolling stock. If there really is a viable enough market there -- and there likely is not -- let them find it and prosper.
Lastly, most increases in train size or frequency are going to have to be mandated to be given reasonable slots on freight railroads. It's going to take forward-thinking Executive and Legislative branches to pull that off.
Enter your email address to join: