crabby_appleton1950
OBS Chief
Is it possible to leave personal attacks out of the responses?
If I may leave a "tip" here, please don't hijack the previous subject.Is it possible to leave personal attacks out of the responses?
I'm referring to personal attacks in THIS thread.If I may leave a "tip" here, please don't hijack the previous subject.Is it possible to leave personal attacks out of the responses?
When I read it initially, I thought perhaps the question was dealing with the QUALITY of the food. As in: the food on trains #1 and #2 -- The Canadian -- are truly first class dining, but is Amtrak's diner food comparable?It's obvious that's what he's asking about. The pedantry about terminology is uncalled for.There is no "first class" on Amtrak long-distance trains. Do you mean the meal included with a sleeper ticket? That would be served in the dining car.
No, The Canadian is different operation all together, that train has a true first class dining car, year round, for the Sleeper Class Plus and Prestige Class passengers.When I read it initially, I thought perhaps the question was dealing with the QUALITY of the food. As in: the food on trains #1 and #2 -- The Canadian -- are truly first class dining, but is Amtrak's diner food comparable?It's obvious that's what he's asking about. The pedantry about terminology is uncalled for.There is no "first class" on Amtrak long-distance trains. Do you mean the meal included with a sleeper ticket? That would be served in the dining car.
And if everyone was willing to pay the fares asked on The Canadian, I'm sure Amtrak would put that quality of food in our diners.No, The Canadian is different operation all together, that train has a true first class dining car, year round, for the Sleeper Class Plus and Prestige Class passengers.When I read it initially, I thought perhaps the question was dealing with the QUALITY of the food. As in: the food on trains #1 and #2 -- The Canadian -- are truly first class dining, but is Amtrak's diner food comparable?It's obvious that's what he's asking about. The pedantry about terminology is uncalled for.There is no "first class" on Amtrak long-distance trains. Do you mean the meal included with a sleeper ticket? That would be served in the dining car.
The menu is pretty upscale, and the choices are far from run of the mill.
Coach class has a cafe menu, on a year round basis, similar to what is offered on the Silver Star, and during the summer peak there is a coach class diner with food cooked on board.
The Ocean serves food from local caterers, but it is still re-heated, and plated on board in a restaurant manner.
Ken
I've had some wonderful meals aboard Amtrak full service diners...perhaps not lately, but a grilled red snapper filet on the Broadway Limited circa 1985 still stands out as the most memorable fish dinner I can recall. The Superliner diners, in particular, were (originally—they may have been downgraded during refits) designed to be the best-equipped kitchens ever placed on American rails. If they were properly staffed and supported (I'd love to see "mini-commissaries" located at major service stops at the middle of the 2-night trips), there's no limit as to the quality of meals they could turn out.The food itself on the Canadian is only a step above Amtrak full service diners in my opinion. What really sets it apart is the class. You never see employees sitting at the tables, tables filled with random odds and ends etc. And the way the steward comes around and recommends wines or drink specials just gives you the feeling of being in an upscale establishment.
We're already paying much more than we did in the past. In many cases we're paying more than first class airfare and in some cases we're even paying similar costs to that of hiring a taxi or limo to drive us half way across the country. Here in this country Amtrak sleepers are among the most expensive means of travel outside of renting exotic supercars and private jets. Has Amtrak food quality improved several times to match our ever increasing fares? No. It has continued to drop in quality and selection even as the ticket cost has substantially increased over time. So far as I can tell there doesn't seem to be much correlation between cost and quality on Amtrak. The Silver Star situation makes it seem like Amtrak dining car staff and maintenance seem unbelievably expensive and inefficient. Almost to the point that it may never be possible to fix it without starting over again from scratch.And if everyone was willing to pay the fares asked on The Canadian, I'm sure Amtrak would put that quality of food in our diners.
Just how much has ticket cost increased over time? I've only got about 17 months of fare data, but a quick look at the EB and CL shows their fares went up about 2.2% during that period (or about 1.7% APR) for mid-bucket coach + roomette. Do you have anything more concrete than "substantial"?. . .the ticket cost has substantially increased over time.
Because if I am on vacation, I would not stay home two days, I would stay two days longer at my destination. It's not that important enough to argue on my part. Just threw that out as a consideration since I travel only for leisure and I have to FLY to a city that has Amtrak service to board my vacation destination THE TRAIN.Why in the world would you assume one is required to spend two nights in a hotel at the destination as opposed to leaving two days later and not paying for two nights anywhere?
Over a period of about eight years routine sleeper fares I was buying for simple transportation between my two most common city pairs more than doubled from a low of around $150 to just shy of $400 each way for the dates I traveled each year. As Amtrak amenities and service levels kept dropping and the schedule worsened I had a harder time accepting the ever increasing fares at reduced satisfaction. I never said the buckets increase two fold, I simply said the tickets available to me increased two fold. That could also be explained with fewer compartments being sold in the lower buckets relative to the number of tickets being sold in the higher buckets.Just how much has ticket cost increased over time? I've only got about 17 months of fare data, but a quick look at the EB and CL shows their fares went up about 2.2% during that period (or about 1.7% APR) for mid-bucket coach + roomette. Do you have anything more concrete than "substantial"?. . .the ticket cost has substantially increased over time.
Thank you for pointing out the fallacy in his reasoning.Why in the world would you assume one is required to spend two nights in a hotel at the destination as opposed to leaving two days later and not paying for two nights anywhere?
I rarely travel for business but when I have there's never been an extraneous team member with nothing better to do than sit and wait for me at the train station. I can only imagine trying to explain why I should take a train that only travels three times a week at twice the cost to my boss. All the irrational whining in the world about hotel costs wouldn't save that conversation from going south in a hurry.When I was traveling for business every week, leaving Chicago in the evening or late afternoon and arrive the next morning, saved a hotel night because I would have had to travel almost the same time to fly. I arrived having showered, worked on my reports, had breakfast, and a team member picking me up at the station. Many times I was cheaper on Amtrak in a roomette than flying the night before, staying in a hotel.
Way to ignore what I said, and go off an another tangent. I was making the comparison between Amtrak and ViaRail (notably The Canadian) food quality, and the pricing, since The Canadian was already mentioned by someone else.We're already paying much more than we did in the past. <sniped out some "yuge" exaggerations> Has Amtrak food quality improved several times to match our ever increasing fares? No. It has continued to drop in quality and selection even as the ticket cost has substantially increased over time. So far as I can tell there doesn't seem to be much correlation between cost and quality on Amtrak. The Silver Star situation makes it seem like Amtrak dining car staff and maintenance seem unbelievably expensive and inefficient. <snip>And if everyone was willing to pay the fares asked on The Canadian, I'm sure Amtrak would put that quality of food in our diners.
The main thing that keeps me from riding The Canadian instead of Amtrak are the obnoxious customs and immigration people I have to pass through to get there. There's also the matter of a limited non-daily schedule that makes planning a bit more difficult, but I suffer from the same problem here on Amtrak as well. Based on what I'm reading in the news it's starting to sound like VIA may be the only long distance option in North America before long. At that point maybe The Canadian will have enough business to increase the frequency to daily again.So now armed with hard facts, how many here would be willing to pay $4000 more for the service The Canadian offers in Prestige? Not many would be willing to do that on an even semi-regular (once a year) trip, I would venture to guess.
Does anyone here think Amtrak has the staff, infrastructure, and willingness to provide freshly prepared first class food at higher prices? If so how do we explain that not even one single route has been blessed with this opportunity? When the Coast Starlight and Empire Builder quietly lost their "premium service" designation did the price of tickets fall to reflect the change? If not, why should we assume that increasing their fares further would bring premium service back again?Fares have gone up and food quality has gone down? Absolutely. Thank the pinch from the government to lower losses. Does anyone here (besides DA) think Amtrak genuinely enjoys cutting service?
Personally I think most airline food has always been crap. Fortunately flights are generally short and unlike train stations airports tend to have dozens of food service options that are better than anything you're likely to find on a plane or train. Accounting for inflation recent coach airfares have actually been among the cheapest I've ever seen. I'm too tall to fit into today's coach pitch but premium economy pitch is similar in price to what standard coach cost in years past.Have fares gone up and food quality gone down on the airlines too? Maybe it's just a coincidence, but on the flights I travel, yes. It's not Amtrak leading this trend here.
I've found, at least in the past year, that is no longer the case. I don't know if it's an official change in OBS policy or just because the dining car staff got tired of people feeling shorted because they weren't automatically given a salad, but my last few trips I've always been asked if I would like a salad.Note, you do have to ASK for the salad. It's free, but not given unless asked for.
On the surface that does indeed sound substantial. But such conclusions are misleading without knowing what the bucket levels were. F'rinstance, if $150 was low bucket and $400 was high bucket:Over a period of about eight years routine sleeper fares I was buying for simple transportation between my two most common city pairs more than doubled from a low of around $150 to just shy of $400 each way for the dates I traveled each year.Just how much has ticket cost increased over time? I've only got about 17 months of fare data, but a quick look at the EB and CL shows their fares went up about 2.2% during that period (or about 1.7% APR) for mid-bucket coach + roomette. Do you have anything more concrete than "substantial"?. . .the ticket cost has substantially increased over time.
My first Amtrak trip in the modern era (two legs each way, coach-roomette and bedroom-coach) was $815. Looking at the same legs for the entire month of next September, the cheapest coach-roomette is $556 and the cheapest bedroom-coach is $604, for a $1160 total or 42% increase. Is 42% increase reasonable over 15 years? (I was just looking at the cheapest prices, without regard to dates of the legs, so it's not a completely reasonable comparison.)Just how much has ticket cost increased over time? I've only got about 17 months of fare data, but a quick look at the EB and CL shows their fares went up about 2.2% during that period (or about 1.7% APR) for mid-bucket coach + roomette. Do you have anything more concrete than "substantial"?
Enter your email address to join: