railgeekteen
Service Attendant
In my opinion via Atlanta is the best option.
The traditional Floridan route through Bloomington does not exist anymore unfortunately.Jacksonville to Atlanta for the leg south of Atlanta - there are more options north of Atlanta than just the one through Indianapolis depending on available rails
While I favor the first route in your post the most, in reality, the most feasible way to re-establish Chicago-Florida service would be to extend the CONO to Florida, in the process restoring the long-awaited service along the Gulf Coast. This would be because there would be less new train miles than with any of the other options.I don't know about where the rails are, but it seems that Chicago - Indianapolis - Louisville - Nashville - Chattanooga - Atlanta would maximize the number of larger intermediate markets that the train would serve. Anything further east would have to go through a whole lot more of Appalachia, slowing down the train, and anything running further west is taking the train out of its way, increasing travel time. Plus, both alternatives bypass all those big intermediate markets.
I'd say Chicago - Ft. Wayne - Cincinnati - Lexington - Knoxville - Chattanooga - Atlanta - Macon - Jacksonville all on the NS.
You might need to put Savannah in between Macon and Jax
This would certainly be the lowest cost option from a number of perspectives.While I favor the first route in your post the most, in reality, the most feasible way to re-establish Chicago-Florida service would be to extend the CONO to Florida, in the process restoring the long-awaited service along the Gulf Coast. This would be because there would be less new train miles than with any of the other options.
I'm all for that. I would love to have direct access from FL to New Orleans, and on to LA even if it were to require an overnight in The Big Easy.While I favor the first route in your post the most, in reality, the most feasible way to re-establish Chicago-Florida service would be to extend the CONO to Florida, in the process restoring the long-awaited service along the Gulf Coast. This would be because there would be less new train miles than with any of the other options.
Nashville is booming (or at least was before the pandemic) and is a great town to visit. I think Nashville-Atlanta is a critical missing link in the network and would be a great intermediate city pair for such a train.
The existing CSX line isn't ideal... Nashville to Chattanooga is not an ideal route by rail or by car. I would love to ride that route though, some beautiful scenery.
I think a Chicago to Florida Train should try to hit the most population centers in the shortest amount of time... Chicago - Ft. Wayne - Cincinnati - Lexington - Knoxville - Chattanooga - Atlanta - Macon - Jacksonville sure seems like it would be a knockout to me.
A Chicago - Atlanta train could meet that route in Chattanooga or Atlanta... would be the best of both worlds.
I do agree Nashville is a VERY happening city that could use rail transportation. Music City Star was started for dirt cheap and yet they can't get any support to expand it, which is a real shame.
That’s a lot of backtracking from Cincy to Louisville, but how about this: A Chicago section through Louisville, and a Detroit section through Cincy combining in Nashville.I voted "other".
Chicago-Indianapolis-Cincinnati-Louisville-Nashville-Chattanooga-Atlanta-etc.
I'd love to include Dayton in the Indianapolis-Cincinnati segment, but it would not be reasonable to do so. A bit too much out of the way, plus Amtrak already uses the route between Indianapolis and Cincinnati.
Yes, but not the same way the Cardinal goes now...I would use the current Cardinal route, and then the original Floridian route from there on.Just being a nit picker, but the original Floridian did go through Indianapolis; the South Wind Route.
Interesting that Amtrak is pushing for replacing the LD sleeper trains with city pairs only to have them need state funding which is likely to fail even in normal times, much less in reduced state income/increased state expense times. Methinks the city pair concept is set up for failure.The route certainly doesn't look too straight, even going through Alabama, but I did see articles from January where Amtrak proposed a Nashville-Atlanta corridor with a running time of 6 hours, 30 minutes. No mention of how much state money it would take, and my guess is neither state legislature would vote to pay anything.
That’s a lot of backtracking from Cincy to Louisville, but how about this: A Chicago section through Louisville, and a Detroit section through Cincy combining in Nashville.