caravanman
Engineer
I feel that more emphasis should be placed on the green/environmental advantages of travel by train.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-47805990
Ed.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-47805990
Ed.
I would like to take the Amtrak more place, but there is a 750 mile rule to deal with and rail advocates seem to be married to it for...reasons. But if there was a budget sleeper option and more, better timed trains I would use them to go places. I personally don't like flying or driving. I see them more as a necessary evil rather than my preferred way to get around. And a lot of Millennials have similar opinions on that.
Oh, my, those trips make me want to go Europe again. Unfortunately, I'd have to fly to get there, so instead I will take Amtrak next winter... kudos to the Swedes for being climate conscious.
One round-trip flight from New York to Europe or to San Francisco creates a warming effect equivalent to 2- 3 tons of carbon dioxide per person. Airline pollution is massive. Another reason why we only took one flight in 20 years. The sad news is that the airports are still full of people every day. People who just want/need to get there in a hurry and could care less. There won't be much change going forward as the airline lobby is very powerful. Trains are the Green alternative way to travel but try to convince the American public. They have become addicted to airline travel.
I am unfamiliar with the 750 mile rule you mention?
In Europe we are lucky to have an extensive rail network, the main bar to rail travel here for me is the cost. So much cheaper to fly, but by booking far in advance, some longer rail trips are within my grasp.
Ed
Federally supported Amtrak routes must be 750 miles in length at minimum. A lot of people on here are against having federal money support lines primarily serving one state cause...reasons...
Or one can do what v v did and sail across the Atlantic on the Queen Mary 2.
Oh, I guess the "United States" is not quite as united as expected when it comes to helping a different area's needs?
Oh, I guess the "United States" is not quite as united as expected when it comes to helping a different area's needs?
It would be wonderful to take the train everywhere. I hope that's a possibility in my lifetime.I'm with you. I did fly to France for a working farm trip with my sister in 2015, and I flew back east for my 50th high school reunion last summer. I can't actually picture what will make me want to get on a plane again (or justify the carbon pollution for me), but I will probably do it again some day when given a strong enough incentive. I was amazed at all the people in the airports, like you said -- they are full. Every plane was full. I guess everyone's incentive threshold is different.
Enter your email address to join: