- Joined
- Feb 2, 2005
- Messages
- 982
The problem with doing this is it would make rail politically unviable in this country. The northeast already gets pretty much whatever it wants while the rest of us have to fight to preserve the scraps we get. Having 1 national operator is the only way to make sure Congress stays united to the extent it does over rail funding. The GOP also tried to do that under Bush and it still failed.Maybe we should split Amtrak into 2 entities; one to service the Norteast Corridor and one to handle the state supported routes and long distance.
Does it work to “some” extent in Europe? Most long distance trains are franchised there. If anything I think our capitalism system here would make it even more appealing. Private companies love to make money off government contracts.
There’s companies out there that would run it at cost plus 10-20 percent just like in Europe. Whats easier, gutting and firing Amtrak’s board and management or finding someone to run the trains who wants to. Both are long shots at this point but either could happen. We will have to wait til after the election and post covid realistically though.
Amtrak is like many other public services in this country. Many want the service and see such service as being important to their quality of life. But, it takes money to provide these services. When it comes to the question of "are you willing to pay more for such service(s)? The answer is: "if that means I have to pay more taxes, then, no, I am not willing to do that". We have been for far too long trying to run the country "on the cheap". Until that mindset changes in the American people, not much is going to improve.
We've increases spending year over year and Congress hasn't worried about the deficit at all. They only pretend to worry when we demand nice things like a halfway functioning train system or health care or education. And even if we did have to pay a tax, a 5¢ per gallon surcharge on fuel production would raise over $7 billion if it was just applied to gasoline. We could have a halfway decent rail system if that was Amtrak's guaranteed budget every year.Amtrak is like many other public services in this country. Many want the service and see such service as being important to their quality of life. But, it takes money to provide these services. When it comes to the question of "are you willing to pay more for such service(s)? The answer is: "if that means I have to pay more taxes, then, no, I am not willing to do that". We have been for far too long trying to run the country "on the cheap". Until that mindset changes in the American people, not much is going to improve.
Personally I think the whole board needs to go and the CEO/president replaced with someone that has run a decent passenger operation, even if it's a small tourist railroad in the back country.Someone needs to tell the board to stay away from the airlines and use someone with ACTUAL RAILROAD KNOWLEDGE.
Yes we should be investing in Amtrak, but we need to rethink how we view trains. Amtrak needs to be viewed as more than long distance trains with some state corridors thrown in.
Is that really true? Doesn't look like the funding to replace the North River Tunnels (arguably the single most significant piece of passenger rail infrastructure in the country) is forthcoming any time soon. Not to mention other stuff like the Susquehanna River Bridge at Havre de Grace or the B&P tunnel in Baltimore. And the Northeast Corridor is probably the only place in the country where passenger rail actually has a significant market share. Whatever we do to "fix the trains" needs to be done in a way that the percentage of the population riding trains increases all over the country.The northeast already gets pretty much whatever it wants while the rest of us have to fight to preserve the scraps we get.
It’s time to cut the bureaucracy and contract a couple long distance trains out to a private operator or the host railroad. Amtrak’s management is corrupt to the core.
Ed Ellis came so close to making Amtrak’s least desirable line a success with the Hoosier State. He was underfunded and out lawyered by Indiana. For a train buff he gave it a great run. Imagine what someone like Brightline or BNSF could do though.
Does it work to “some” extent in Europe? Most long distance trains are franchised there. If anything I think our capitalism system here would make it even more appealing. Private companies love to make money off government contracts.
Well, VRE and MBTA Commuter Rail are both operated by Keolis, which is owned by SNCF (70%) and some sort of Quebec public sector pension fund (30%). The taxpayers of Virginia and Massachusetts seem to be OK with it.In the UK at least, most of the franchise holders are subsidiaries of the state owned railways in the rest of Europe. I wouldn't not want US tax dollars to pad the bottom line of DB or SNCF. And I doubt most politicians would be so willing to privatize Amtrak that they'd willingly subsidize foreign operators.
I just started a new thread "Time to Change the Paradigm" after thinking about your question. I think things may have changed a bit in 60 years and there might just be different ways to do things now.Host railroads? Think back 60 years ago! Why do you think Amtrak was formed?
That may be so...but freight railroads will not get back into passenger business...that you can be sure of.I just started a new thread "Time to Change the Paradigm" after thinking about your question. I think things may have changed a bit in 60 years and there might just be different ways to do things now.
Enter your email address to join: