neroden
Engineer
Damn Kasich. We could have had Cincy-Columbus-Cleveland up and running by now if not for him.
It needs to be remembered that most likely after 12/31/2018 all passenger trains will have to run on lines PTC equipped. The best you can hope for is all new rail line with PTC with no grade crossings and all rail crossings will be fly overs. The curves will be much broader than the freight lines have.Open up a rail map of Arizona + New Mexico, and the answer will become clear as night follows a day to anyone.Going with Palmetto's idea: What if we were able to do Los Angeles - Phoenix - Albuquerque? Would that be much longer in time than the current SWC route between LAX and Albuquerque? That would open up a huge market to the route.
Why do you think there will be a huge market on a slow and meandering route through the sticks where very few people live, and where they can drive way quicker on relatively unclogged highways than taking the train?
One practical way to do it would be using the Deming - (Southwest Railroad Short Line) - Rincon - (BNSF) - Belen - (BNSF) - Albuquerque route. At least the riders will get a good grand tour of 2/3rds of New Mexico in the process, while they slowly meander along the Short LineAccording the the map, there is no connection from the UP to the BNSF in Phoenix that would allow that, and there seems not to any room to build one either, unfortunately.I believe the BNSF line from El Paso to Belen, which this rotue would join at Rincon, is in very good condition, but BNSF may have a conniption if someone proposed running a passenger train on it. The connection to this route at El paso faces the wrong way for a train coming from Tucson.
The other would be to run in reverse from Phoenix to Drake on the Arizona Central, slowly, and then reverse direction so that one is moving forward again on BNSF joining the BNSF main line at West Williams jct, and then to ABQ. This has the advantage of using established BNSF route including Williams and Flagstaff on the route, but would probably be sow as dickens.
All this assumes of coruse that the connection from Roll to Arlington ( that is the actual portion between Phoenix and Welton that is out of service) over the old SP main is restored allowing trains to come to Phoenix from the west.
How is it no loss?If Oregon ever wanted to put in real money (sigh) a reroute over the Medford route would be very successful. Klamath Falls is no loss. The Medford route needs a lot of money to bring it up to decent speeds, though, and I just don't see Oregon putting in the money in the next decade or two.
I think the point was that the reroute would serve several small cities and a lot more population than the current route.How is it no loss?If Oregon ever wanted to put in real money (sigh) a reroute over the Medford route would be very successful. Klamath Falls is no loss. The Medford route needs a lot of money to bring it up to decent speeds, though, and I just don't see Oregon putting in the money in the next decade or two.
It took me a second to catch it, but I love that name.Grand Rapids-Lansing-Ann Arbor-Detroit.
“The Palm Reader”
Here's a link to an MDOT study from a couple years ago, if you want to dig into the route options looked at for this service:Grand Rapids-Lansing-Ann Arbor-Detroit.
“The Palm Reader”
No idea how the trackage would work, but connecting four of the most populous Mitten cities by rail makes 100 percent sense. We don’t all want only to go to Chicago.
Sent from my iPhone using Amtrak Forum
There is no need to remember that since that is simply not true since that is not what the law says. Go and read the CFR and then come back and tell that to use again. Stop making nonsensical claims please.It needs to be remembered that most likely after 12/31/2018 all passenger trains will have to run on lines PTC equipped. The best you can hope for is all new rail line with PTC with no grade crossings and all rail crossings will be fly overs. The curves will be much broader than the freight lines have.
Enter your email address to join: