I wouldn't think you would want to be running diesels into a tunnel and underground station anyway, even if the station ventilation was designed for diesels which it probably wasn't.
My guess is they’re referring to the 24 DM30AC dual mode locomotives which currently are used to access Penn station - this allows direct trains from the eastern parts of LI, where tracks are not electrified.I wouldn't think you would want to be running diesels into a tunnel and underground station anyway, even if the station ventilation was designed for diesels which it probably wasn't.
Operationally, it is true that they have more equipment than the new terminal can even handle, but I suspect that perhaps politically it could be a “big deal”, since many, or maybe even most of the affluent riders from the east end diesel territory desire to go there without change…Is it a big deal that only a quarter-ish of their fleet can't run through those tunnels though? Yes, it's an obvious inconvenience, but out of their many major terminals don't they have adequate equipment for service to this one major station?
The right way to fix that is to electrify the diesel territory not perpetuate the boondoggle. Even when one or two through trains make it to Penn Station if the DMs cooperate most feel cheated out of electrification at least on the Port Jeff Branch which used to be stomping grounds and I still know many people thereOperationally, it is true that they have more equipment than the new terminal can even handle, but I suspect that perhaps politically it could be a “big deal”, since many, or maybe even most of the affluent riders from the east end diesel territory desire to go there without change…
Might make sense to electrify the PJ branch, but do you think it would be wise to do so to Montalk, or especially, to Greenport?The right way to fix that is to electrify the diesel territory not perpetuate the boondoggle. Even when one or two through trains make it to Penn Station if the DMs cooperate most feel cheated out of electrification at least on the Port Jeff Branch which used to be stomping grounds and I still know many people there
Perhaps not, but they don’t have to go to GCT without changing at Jamaica either. In any case the size of the tunnel under the East River is water under the bridge at present. The only possible fix would be to build DEMUs within that loading gauge which the Brits have shown can be done.Might make sense to electrify the PJ branch, but do you think it would be wise to do so to Montalk, or especially, to Greenport?
Although ironically when BR decide to electrify the southern region line to Hastings, because the original DEMUs had been built especially narrow to fit in the existing tunnels, rather than build special EMUs they chose to single track the tunnels so that standard EMUs could be used. In this case the tunnels are short enough that the short single track sections aren't a bottleneck for the schedule.The only possible fix would be to build DEMUs within that loading gauge which the Brits have shown can be done.
BR standard EMUs I believe are small enough to pass throgh ESA East River tunnels IIRC.Although ironically when BR decide to electrify the southern region line to Hastings, because the original DEMUs had been built especially narrow to fit in the existing tunnels, rather than build special EMUs they chose to single track the tunnels so that standard EMUs could be used. In this case the tunnels are short enough that the short single track sections aren't a bottleneck for the schedule.
I'm sure they would be given the standard UK loading gauge is much smaller than ours.BR standard EMUs I believe are small enough to pass throgh ESA East River tunnels IIRC.
Wait, are you saying "they don't build them like they used to" doesn't always mean better?Interestingly the reason those Hastings tunnels were so narrow in the first place was that the contractor for them had skimped on the layers of brick needed to meet the specs. When the company found out, they had to add more layers of brick thus rendering the tunnels smaller than the standard loading gauge. So this went even beyond "shrink wrapping".
Enter your email address to join: