Not to many sleepers available on a CHI - WAS - NYP routing. And that's Amtrak's preferred routing from LAX....which if you think about it, is an assigned seat.That's why I take a sleeper .Because I'd go into their headquarters and find the person who came up with that idea and beat them to a pulp. Who wants assigned seats? I sure don't. Being stuck next to a nasty person for a 3 hour plane ride is bad enough. For 3 days on the Eagle? Huh-uh.All of the above just gets back to my main beef with Amtrak - why don't they issue tickets with car AND seat numbers :angry: . It just isn't that hard.AlohaShe got on the train after I did. In fact, she got on over a thousand miles after I did, but I don't think that's a good guage by which to decide who should be moved.
But Since you were there first and met the requirement for lower level seating, I fail to understand why you were being aske, or forced to relocate.
Eric
It all ends up in a seat scramble (from a low level platform with international baggage) at WAS (as there is no, or minimal, baggage service on the NEC).
And just what is it with WAS, CHI and NYP with corralling passengers prior to boarding. LAX and EMY (and most of the rest of the world) have open access to the platforms where passengers can board at leisure.
Why don't you people revolt? Didn't stop you in 1776 h34r: . You seem to have turned into the most compliant and manipulated populace on earth.