Agreed. I try to only start threads if I have a specific question or notable information that doesn't fit anywhere else.There are plenty of other threads that discuss various aspects of MARC equipment.
If you have something specific to discuss, start a thread. We don't need a single rudderless thread with no real content.
Hey, I looked at the minutes of the last MRAC meeting, and I see that WMATA has eliminated the "metro option" for dealing with MARC/VRE meltdowns. (They let people ride Metro by showing a MARC or VRE ticket. I actually used that once when flooding on the Anacostia River caused all the Penn Line trains to terminate at New Carrolton..) Another boneheaded move by Metro to discourage people from taking public transportation. They really need to think regionally and have all of the different fiefdoms -- States, agencies, operators work together to make sure we poor harried commuters can get around without too much hassle. Traffic is bad enough as it is. Each rush hour MARC train has over 1,000 passengers. How would the jurisdictions like it if all of us started driving around in single occupancy vehicles? Think the Beltway is jammed up now? Heh, he, just wait.MARC has a few interesting equipment related items that have been spread around on this forum or have no obvious home. PTC and HHP-8 update are two examples. The MRAC (MARC Riders Advisory Council) Minutes are a place to start. https://mta.maryland.gov/marc-riders-advisory-council-meeting-minutes-0
These days I think the chances of a WMATA meltdown are greater than a MARC meltdown. Maybe that's why it was eliminated.Hey, I looked at the minutes of the last MRAC meeting, and I see that WMATA has eliminated the "metro option" for dealing with MARC/VRE meltdowns. (They let people ride Metro by showing a MARC or VRE ticket. I actually used that once when flooding on the Anacostia River caused all the Penn Line trains to terminate at New Carrolton..) Another boneheaded move by Metro to discourage people from taking public transportation. They really need to think regionally and have all of the different fiefdoms -- States, agencies, operators work together to make sure we poor harried commuters can get around without too much hassle. Traffic is bad enough as it is. Each rush hour MARC train has over 1,000 passengers. How would the jurisdictions like it if all of us started driving around in single occupancy vehicles? Think the Beltway is jammed up now? Heh, he, just wait.MARC has a few interesting equipment related items that have been spread around on this forum or have no obvious home. PTC and HHP-8 update are two examples. The MRAC (MARC Riders Advisory Council) Minutes are a place to start. https://mta.maryland.gov/marc-riders-advisory-council-meeting-minutes-0
I generally dislike those broader topics in other forums. They tend to be about nothing in particular, and you miss important news because it’s buried amongst tons and tons of mundane stuff (My train was 6 minutes late...there’s a burnt out lightbulb on the platform at Martinsburg...the conductor dressed up like an old-timey railroad guy for Halloween...MARC just announced they’re electrifying the entire system and buying Japanese bullet trains...Some passengers missed the train because it departed from track 2 instead of track 1...What do you think of their current bilevel cars?...Here’s a photo I took of my friend riding MARC in 1995...etc.).I’m used to aircraft and military forums that tend to have bigger topics (Indian Navy, F-35...). Very focused topics seem to wander way off topic quickly. In affect, they become a broader topic but not as easy to find. For example, the MARC and Amtrak HHP-8 failures discussion in the Amtrak Siemens Charger section. Or, the topics die quickly. The MARC Charger Starting Service topic had one older entry when I found it. Broader topics seem to last longer while still providing structure. The “what are you doing” topic on this forum may not be very specific but does get lots of posts. One other way is to introduce a more focussed hierarchy and have, for example, a DC area commuter category with smaller topics under it. Some of the larger rail forums use that idea successfully to make it easier to find info. In the end, posting is optional. TTFN
This is a simultaneous meltdown question. IOW. Unless there is a common cause like high wind stopping/slowing all above ground passenger rail operations (it happened), WMATA and MARC are unlikely to meltdown on the same day. They do have some capacity to backup each other. The fact that WMATA was doing it for free is intriguing.These days I think the chances of a WMATA meltdown are greater than a MARC meltdown. Maybe that's why it was eliminated.Hey, I looked at the minutes of the last MRAC meeting, and I see that WMATA has eliminated the "metro option" for dealing with MARC/VRE meltdowns. (They let people ride Metro by showing a MARC or VRE ticket. I actually used that once when flooding on the Anacostia River caused all the Penn Line trains to terminate at New Carrolton..) Another boneheaded move by Metro to discourage people from taking public transportation. They really need to think regionally and have all of the different fiefdoms -- States, agencies, operators work together to make sure we poor harried commuters can get around without too much hassle. Traffic is bad enough as it is. Each rush hour MARC train has over 1,000 passengers. How would the jurisdictions like it if all of us started driving around in single occupancy vehicles? Think the Beltway is jammed up now? Heh, he, just wait.MARC has a few interesting equipment related items that have been spread around on this forum or have no obvious home. PTC and HHP-8 update are two examples. The MRAC (MARC Riders Advisory Council) Minutes are a place to start. https://mta.maryland.gov/marc-riders-advisory-council-meeting-minutes-0
Can't speak about Camden and Brunswick lines, but Penn Line is doing OK. They slowed the schedule over the summer due to track work, so now I have to get up a half hour earlier in the morning to xatch a train at 0521 instead of the 0550 I used to ride, and that one has been running on time pretty consistently. It's usualy being pushed by an HHP8.Has MARC service deteriorated noticeably recently? I ride a parallel Metro Rail train, but I read about crew training problems related to Charger locomotive setup, increased CSX interference, and the expectation that PTC will make things worse. All of this on top off existing problems with older locomotives, etc. The latest statistics I can find are from the middle of the year and they dont seem good.
These minutes from the MARC Riders Advisory Council discuss a lot of what I have been hearing. CSX interference and weather being problems. https://mta.maryland.gov/sites/default/files/MARCRAC_Minutes_2018-08-16.pdfAnyone know about the Camden and Brunswick lines? Is the CSX interference being worked around?
I thought I heard a rumor going around that Marc was using a Sprinter or two. They should have leased them from Septa. They have about 6 or 7 that just sit everyday cause they don't have their new Push Pull equipment yet. :lol:MARC leased three ACS-64s from Amtrak. They've had them since the holidays.
I was wondering why I saw an ACS-64 coupled to some MARC bilevels at WAS yesterday evening. Came here to see if anyone knew and of course the answer was waiting for me!MARC leased three ACS-64s from Amtrak. They've had them since the holidays.
An example 31 minutes into this video.Some of the Marc equipment doesn’t have ACSES, so they leased a few units.
Take that, Amtrak IG!!
A question. Could the lack of a restroom and the top speed restriction of 110 mph on the SEPTA locomotives have any affect on MARC’s preference for AMTRAK ACS-64s?I thought I heard a rumor going around that Marc was using a Sprinter or two. [emoji4] They should have leased them from Septa. They have about 6 or 7 that just sit everyday cause they don't have their new Push Pull equipment yet.
Enter your email address to join: