TheMalahat
Service Attendant
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2016
- Messages
- 122
Lots of pictures: http://www.metrolinktrains.com/agency/page/title/Tier_4_Locomotives
yep, and the maximum speed was limited to 15 mph on the p40 locomotives while that control stand was in use.If the rear windows are for hostler controls, what exactly IS hostler controls? Is it the control stand at the rear of the loco?
They have ~60 feet of locomotive between the rear coupler and the main controls. The hostler controls allow for easier sight lines when coupling to their cars. This is the same reason that freight trains when coupling have someone on the ground near the coupler giving instructions to the engineer.Cody, why would they need a hostler control stand if they already have a control stand at the front of the loco?
When backing up, the engineer could just simply stick his head out the window and look back, or look in the rearview mirrors.
It's not as simple as sticking your head out a window or looking in the side mirrors.Cody, why would they need a hostler control stand if they already have a control stand at the front of the loco?
When backing up, the engineer could just simply stick his head out the window and look back, or look in the rearview mirrors.
God Bless America.According to a posting in trainorders, the F125 project is currently in deep doo doo. It has not been certified by FRA yet, so deliveries are all held up by the bunch of issues that need to be resolved first. meanwhile Vossloh which is a supplier of design and parts to EMD for the F125 has been acquired by Stadler, which competes with EMD in the US. So things are not exactly going peachy between EMD and Vossloh anymore. Considering that Vossloh manufactures the body of the F125, that is - shall we say - a bit of a problem, over and above the problems with FRA certification, or lack thereof. Meanwhile EMD is apparently so late that they have already reached the maximum liquidated damages, so they are unlikely to deliver anything further until all issues are resolved. So everyone is sitting around the one hangar queen in possession of Metrolink (905) and apparently another one sitting in Pueblo, which is yet to complete the testing for certification, for issues to resolve first. Seems like shades of CAF repeating itself here.
EMD has already been withdrawn from use as a brand, though they do still make many freight locomotives.I do wonder how long EMD will continue. This is not their first major mis-step in the last several years and Cat has shown signs that they might be willing to pull the plug on it. At the very least, the competition for passenger locomotives is very strong in the usa and this could kill that department for EMD.
Yes, though the whole tier 4 transition has been a disaster for EMD too. Progress Rail is a better brand, so it might help reboot EMD even if it's no longer called EMD.EMD has already been withdrawn from use as a brand, though they do still make many freight locomotives.I do wonder how long EMD will continue. This is not their first major mis-step in the last several years and Cat has shown signs that they might be willing to pull the plug on it. At the very least, the competition for passenger locomotives is very strong in the usa and this could kill that department for EMD.
With everybody owning everybody else these days, isn't it already quite common that parts are sourced from competitors in the industry? I don't think this situation is totally unprecedented nor unresolvable.According to a posting in trainorders, the F125 project is currently in deep doo doo. It has not been certified by FRA yet, so deliveries are all held up by the bunch of issues that need to be resolved first. meanwhile Vossloh which is a supplier of design and parts to EMD for the F125 has been acquired by Stadler, which competes with EMD in the US. So things are not exactly going peachy between EMD and Vossloh anymore. Considering that Vossloh manufactures the body of the F125, that is - shall we say - a bit of a problem, over and above the problems with FRA certification, or lack thereof.
However EMD does make locomotives for the European market, so there is a conflict there.With everybody owning everybody else these days, isn't it already quite common that parts are sourced from competitors in the industry? I don't think this situation is totally unprecedented nor unresolvable.According to a posting in trainorders, the F125 project is currently in deep doo doo. It has not been certified by FRA yet, so deliveries are all held up by the bunch of issues that need to be resolved first. meanwhile Vossloh which is a supplier of design and parts to EMD for the F125 has been acquired by Stadler, which competes with EMD in the US. So things are not exactly going peachy between EMD and Vossloh anymore. Considering that Vossloh manufactures the body of the F125, that is - shall we say - a bit of a problem, over and above the problems with FRA certification, or lack thereof.
And whereas Stadler may now be building locomotives for the European market, they are not supplying any in the US market nor planning to, so I don't see an immediate conflict of interest.
You might need to add larger fuel tanks and beef up the HEP. But apart from that i don't see why it wouldn't work.Is this a rugged and meaty enough unit to stand up to Amtrak use?
It would help to have a unit or two for testing...You might need to add larger fuel tanks and beef up the HEP. But apart from that i don't see why it wouldn't work.Is this a rugged and meaty enough unit to stand up to Amtrak use?
Enter your email address to join: