As long as you are the only one on the train, sure!That little thing? Heck, rev up the engines and jump it.
As long as you are the only one on the train, sure!That little thing? Heck, rev up the engines and jump it.
If you zoom out you can see the shadow of the Google laser cannon as it acquires the target.Based on this news report, this is the bridge that burned near La Junta on the SWC's route.
Nope, they are still there (somehow). I think there's still one or two at the northern/eastern end of Glorieta Pass and the ones by Wagon Mound. Might be one or two more just west of Las Vegas too.
Hope you got some pictures! The history is one of the reasons that I love(d) the Chief. Between the Wig Wag, the Semaphores, the jointed rail, it made for some great history. Unfortunately it's almost all gone now...From the highway we saw 3 or 4 sets by wagon mound and 1 south (railroad west?) of Las Vegas.
Here we go again!
Out of LAX: SL#2 cancelled and TE#422 will originate SAS
Westbound #1 showing "Service Disruption" between ALP and ELP.
Here we go again!
Out of LAX: SL#2 cancelled and TE#422 will originate SAS
Westbound #1 showing "Service Disruption" between ALP and ELP.
Why would Amtrak be against refunding unused tickets related to a cancelled or annulled train? It costs them almost nothing and absolves them of any further liability. A bigger question is what should happen to an Amtrak passenger who gets stuck far away from home through no fault of their own. Does a pro rata refund on the unused portion of their trip (that could take days to clear and may not be enough to buy a walkup flight home) make them whole again?The recent increase in the number of Amtrak trains being cancelled due to bridge fires raises an interesting question: if a passenger has a round trip ticket – let’s say from Los Angeles to Chicago with a return from Chicago to Los Angeles – and the Los Angeles train to Chicago is cancelled, can that passenger request a full refund that includes the return trip, even though that train might not be cancelled?
Here's what happened to me on #1 on this latest fire incident. They terminated the train at ELP May 1 and gave us the choice of abandoning the train there with no alternative transportation west or ride the train back to NOL for free. I had a connection in LAX on #14 on the same reservation. These were the final two legs of my circle trip. I got off at ELP and flew back to SFO the next day (yesterday). One night Hilton hotel plus one-way American Airlines fare ELP-SFO cost just under $500. Today, Amtrak refunded the full fare from NIB-LAX-SFO (bedroom and roomette) of $1,065, no questions asked. This even though I had enjoyed about 30 hours in a bedroom on the way west. They said the refund would process in five to eight days back to my cc, and gave me a confirmation number. Am I disappointed? Not financially, but I am sorry I didn't get to complete the train trip. But it wasn't Amtrak's fault. There's always a next time.A bigger question is what should happen to an Amtrak passenger who gets stuck far away from home through no fault of their own. Does a pro rata refund on the unused portion of their trip (that could take days to clear and may not be enough to buy a walkup flight home) make them whole again?
I would say definitely yes. If Amtak can't get you there they can't get you back either. They can't suppose you'll take alternate transpotrtation.The recent increase in the number of Amtrak trains being cancelled due to bridge fires raises an interesting question: if a passenger has a round trip ticket – let’s say from Los Angeles to Chicago with a return from Chicago to Los Angeles – and the Los Angeles train to Chicago is cancelled, can that passenger request a full refund that includes the return trip, even though that train might not be cancelled? How about a full refund for any connecting trains that are under the same reservation number as the cancelled Los Angeles to Chicago train?
Thanks to everyone for their comments to my question. Common sense would indicate that a full refund would be in order. But, judging from some of the AU posts I’ve read, common sense and Amtrak often have little in common.I would say definitely yes. If Amtak can't get you there they can't get you back either. They can't suppose you'll take alternate transpotrtation.
Enter your email address to join: