Correct, WAS ! We need an easy station once and awhile. Your turn to post.
That isn't an easy one,but you should have removed the URL which gave the answer.OK Rick, here is an easy active Amtrak Station:
You are correct.I I don't know anything about computer code, but that picture is in the Google stock of images. I think if you rename the photo it won't be identified in .58 of a second on Google.I don't see the answer in the URL.
However, if you have an internet photo (with a URL) that you want to post for people to guess the location in this thread, it is possible to rename the photo on your desktop before attaching to the post, so that a search on Google is unsuccessful. I just did a test using the above photo of the Lafayette, IN, station. Google could not identify the renamed photo.The filename or URL don't have anything to do with it.
If the picture is the same, and posted elsewhere on the web, Google will match it.
Google Image Search makes it too easy. Here's one from my personal photos that doesn't appear to have any easy equivalent on Google.
063-1.jpg
I was waiting for prech786 to acknowledge my answer to his Canadian(non-Amtrak) station photo.RRRick -
Looks like you had the last correct identification three days ago.
Would you like to post another photo?
You are correct and so is RyanS....... I was counting on a Maryland guy for this one.And, as I recall, he drove buses in the WAS area in his college days.
Enter your email address to join: