neroden
Engineer
I wasn't implying that you were. For your edification:I don't think it is unreasonable at all to try and make a situation better for someone.
The term "reasonable accomodation" is a term of art in disability law. In the context of being a customer of a Amtrak, this is one of the clauses in the Code of Federal Regulations to which it refers:
Amtrak, like practically any business which provides any service to the general public, is considered a "public accomodation".§36.302 Modifications in policies, practices, or procedures.
(a) General. A public accommodation shall make reasonable modifications in policies, practices, or procedures, when the modifications are necessary to afford goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations to individuals with disabilities, unless the public accommodation can demonstrate that making the modifications would fundamentally alter the nature of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations.
The question of whether or not "the public accommodation can demonstrate that making the modifications would fundamentally alter the nature of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations" is usually described as whether the accomodation is "reasonable" or not.
This is another one of the clauses to which "reasonable accomodation" refers:
Publishing the ingredients lists which they receive from the suppliers already is hard to construe as an undue burden.§36.303 Auxiliary aids and services.
(a) General. A public accommodation shall take those steps that may be necessary to ensure that no individual with a disability is excluded, denied services, segregated or otherwise treated differently than other individuals because of the absence of auxiliary aids and services, unless the public accommodation can demonstrate that taking those steps would fundamentally alter the nature of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations being offered or would result in an undue burden, i.e., significant difficulty or expense.
For a long time there was a question over whether serious allergies were considered a disability (i.e. is it legal to discriminate against people who have them), but this question was apparently settled a few years ago. This is actually the question which was not clear legally speaking; by contrast, the question of whether they have to make minor informational accomodations if it is considered a disability seems cut and dried.
I'm going to pursue a couple more avenues, starting with some certified mail to the very top (also, does Amtrak have an ADA coordinator / point person? That would be another place to write). I should ask y'all to help me make sure I have the right addresses.
If that doesn't work I think I should contact a disabiilty lawyer.
Last edited by a moderator: