Which situation? The fairly inconsistent service? Sorry, that's entirely on Amtrak. Yes, late, delayed trains can sometimes be blamed on the host railroads or lack of money, but the inconsistent customer service? That's entirely on Amtrak.Usually most people only rate when they recieve bad experiences. Unfirtunately, these people don't understand Amtraks situation. If these people were educated about Amtraks situation, they might understand why these kind of things happen.
The thing is, not everyone likes trains for the same reason.If you think Amtrak's rating is bad...
https://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/united.html
https://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/american_airlines.htm
https://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/delta.htm
Southwest's ratings are much higher than those three and Amtrak's though: https://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/southwest.html
Greyhound is also worse than Amtrak...
https://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/greyhound.html
To most people travel is a necessary evil. They either have to or want to be on the other end but getting there to most people (judging by these ratings) is an unpleasant experience. That's why I still think anyone who takes the TE from CHI to LAX instead of the SWC and spending a whole extra day getting there is crazy.
IMO the train experience is still better than both the airplane and bus (more comfortable seats, more legroom, the ability to move around and I would guess that most people traveling each mode for the same amount of time would favor the train experience over bus/rail. The plane will always be faster and for most travel above around 400 miles air travel will always be the most popular no matter how many times United literally throws passengers off planes. Trains should be more popular than buses but I'm guessing buses have more coverage and cheaper prices in general so they are more popular than trains for intercity travel (although I would guess trains would be more popular than buses for trips above 400 miles).
Again, people can complain all they want about the travel experience but it rarely stops them from doing so.
I don't mean to quibble over a minor point, but the majority of train passengers care nothing about the trains themselves or the train journey and are perfectly capable of flying to any destination - and sometimes do.. People take the train for any number of reasons - convenience, schedule, personal preference, lack of hassle associated with air travel, etc. But the biggest reason might be simply to avoid driving; It is the automobile - not the airplane - which is the passenger trains' primary competition (generally, even in corridors).The thing is, not everyone likes trains for the same reason.If you think Amtrak's rating is bad...
https://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/united.html
https://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/american_airlines.htm
https://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/delta.htm
Southwest's ratings are much higher than those three and Amtrak's though: https://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/southwest.html
Greyhound is also worse than Amtrak...
https://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/greyhound.html
To most people travel is a necessary evil. They either have to or want to be on the other end but getting there to most people (judging by these ratings) is an unpleasant experience. That's why I still think anyone who takes the TE from CHI to LAX instead of the SWC and spending a whole extra day getting there is crazy.
IMO the train experience is still better than both the airplane and bus (more comfortable seats, more legroom, the ability to move around and I would guess that most people traveling each mode for the same amount of time would favor the train experience over bus/rail. The plane will always be faster and for most travel above around 400 miles air travel will always be the most popular no matter how many times United literally throws passengers off planes. Trains should be more popular than buses but I'm guessing buses have more coverage and cheaper prices in general so they are more popular than trains for intercity travel (although I would guess trains would be more popular than buses for trips above 400 miles).
Again, people can complain all they want about the travel experience but it rarely stops them from doing so.
Some are train lovers. They love the mechanic aspect of the engines. Eg, foamers, train spotters.
Some are train ride lovers. They love the journey aspect. The longer the trip the merrier.
Some are not train lovers at all. They take trains out of necessity because they cannot fly for some reason.
While I would be unlikely to choose the Texas Eagle over the Southwest Chief for a trip between Chicago and Los Angeles, I would be quite willing to consider it for a trip between Los Angeles and Little Rock or between Chicago and Tucson....That's why I still think anyone who takes the TE from CHI to LAX instead of the SWC and spending a whole extra day getting there is crazy.
I don't disagree for the most part. But to your last point I think only in short to medium distances, corridors most definitely. LD trains' competition is still flying.I don't mean to quibble over a minor point, but the majority of train passengers care nothing about the trains themselves or the train journey and are perfectly capable of flying to any destination - and sometimes do.. People take the train for any number of reasons - convenience, schedule, personal preference, lack of hassle associated with air travel, etc. But the biggest reason might be simply to avoid driving; It is the automobile - not the airplane - which is the passenger trains' primary competition (generally, even in corridors).The thing is, not everyone likes trains for the same reason.If you think Amtrak's rating is bad...
https://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/united.htmlhttps://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/american_airlines.htmhttps://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/delta.htm
Southwest's ratings are much higher than those three and Amtrak's though: https://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/southwest.html
Greyhound is also worse than Amtrak...
https://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/greyhound.html
To most people travel is a necessary evil. They either have to or want to be on the other end but getting there to most people (judging by these ratings) is an unpleasant experience. That's why I still think anyone who takes the TE from CHI to LAX instead of the SWC and spending a whole extra day getting there is crazy.
IMO the train experience is still better than both the airplane and bus (more comfortable seats, more legroom, the ability to move around and I would guess that most people traveling each mode for the same amount of time would favor the train experience over bus/rail. The plane will always be faster and for most travel above around 400 miles air travel will always be the most popular no matter how many times United literally throws passengers off planes. Trains should be more popular than buses but I'm guessing buses have more coverage and cheaper prices in general so they are more popular than trains for intercity travel (although I would guess trains would be more popular than buses for trips above 400 miles).
Again, people can complain all they want about the travel experience but it rarely stops them from doing so.
Some are train lovers. They love the mechanic aspect of the engines. Eg, foamers, train spotters.
Some are train ride lovers. They love the journey aspect. The longer the trip the merrier.
Some are not train lovers at all. They take trains out of necessity because they cannot fly for some reason.
If Amtrak's business was based primarily on train lovers and those who can't fly, no train would need be more than one car long.
From endpoint to endpoint (both major destinations, with frequent, reasonably priced air service) possibly. Most long-distance (LD) route business, however, is to and from intermediate points, many of which don't have air service to begin with. Further, many passengers are not actually travelling all that far; Average distances vary by route, but figure for 400-600 miles or so while the train or automobile are both slower than flying (its not a race anyway), both remain quite competitive.I don't disagree for the most part. But to your last point I think only in short to medium distances, corridors most definitely. LD trains' competition is still flying.I don't mean to quibble over a minor point, but the majority of train passengers care nothing about the trains themselves or the train journey and are perfectly capable of flying to any destination - and sometimes do.. People take the train for any number of reasons - convenience, schedule, personal preference, lack of hassle associated with air travel, etc. But the biggest reason might be simply to avoid driving; It is the automobile - not the airplane - which is the passenger trains' primary competition (generally, even in corridors).The thing is, not everyone likes trains for the same reason.If you think Amtrak's rating is bad...
https://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/united.htmlhttps://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/american_airlines.htmhttps://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/delta.htm
Southwest's ratings are much higher than those three and Amtrak's though: https://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/southwest.html
Greyhound is also worse than Amtrak...
https://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/greyhound.html
To most people travel is a necessary evil. They either have to or want to be on the other end but getting there to most people (judging by these ratings) is an unpleasant experience. That's why I still think anyone who takes the TE from CHI to LAX instead of the SWC and spending a whole extra day getting there is crazy.
IMO the train experience is still better than both the airplane and bus (more comfortable seats, more legroom, the ability to move around and I would guess that most people traveling each mode for the same amount of time would favor the train experience over bus/rail. The plane will always be faster and for most travel above around 400 miles air travel will always be the most popular no matter how many times United literally throws passengers off planes. Trains should be more popular than buses but I'm guessing buses have more coverage and cheaper prices in general so they are more popular than trains for intercity travel (although I would guess trains would be more popular than buses for trips above 400 miles).
Again, people can complain all they want about the travel experience but it rarely stops them from doing so.
Some are train lovers. They love the mechanic aspect of the engines. Eg, foamers, train spotters.
Some are train ride lovers. They love the journey aspect. The longer the trip the merrier.
Some are not train lovers at all. They take trains out of necessity because they cannot fly for some reason.
If Amtrak's business was based primarily on train lovers and those who can't fly, no train would need be more than one car long.
I totally forgot about the Consumer Affairs website! Hadn't looked at that site in ages. Will have to see how Megabus is rated on there later, just outta curiosity.If you think Amtrak's rating is bad...
https://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/united.html
https://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/american_airlines.htm
https://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/delta.htm
Southwest's ratings are much higher than those three and Amtrak's though: https://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/southwest.html
Greyhound is also worse than Amtrak...
https://www.consumeraffairs.com/travel/greyhound.html
To most people travel is a necessary evil. They either have to or want to be on the other end but getting there to most people (judging by these ratings) is an unpleasant experience. That's why I still think anyone who takes the TE from CHI to LAX instead of the SWC and spending a whole extra day getting there is crazy.
IMO the train experience is still better than both the airplane and bus (more comfortable seats, more legroom, the ability to move around and I would guess that most people traveling each mode for the same amount of time would favor the train experience over bus/rail. The plane will always be faster and for most travel above around 400 miles air travel will always be the most popular no matter how many times United literally throws passengers off planes. Trains should be more popular than buses but I'm guessing buses have more coverage and cheaper prices in general so they are more popular than trains for intercity travel (although I would guess trains would be more popular than buses for trips above 400 miles).
Again, people can complain all they want about the travel experience but it rarely stops them from doing so.
Passengers don't care about that crap. They only care about price, schedule, and reliability. When they are burned, they don't care why. And they are likely not to return.I do wonder if some of those negative raters would've rated Amtrak more fairly, if more of those reviewers were aware Amtrak is at the mercy of freight railroads(for their long distance trains) when it comes to how quickly it'll arrive into stations?
Whether a passenger comes out of an experience feeling burned depends a lot on their expectations going in. I noticed a lot of complaints from people who booked LD train trips expecting to be somewhere/attend some event/meet up with someone within an hour or two of the scheduled arrival. Experienced Amtrak riders know that that's a recipe for disaster - that LD trains are often several hours late (for reasons that are not always Amtrak's fault), so if you absolutely need to be somewhere at a particular time, you need to have a scheduled arrival time that's much earlier, or you need to choose another mode of transportation.Passengers don't care about that crap. They only care about price, schedule, and reliability. When they are burned, they don't care why. And they are likely not to return.I do wonder if some of those negative raters would've rated Amtrak more fairly, if more of those reviewers were aware Amtrak is at the mercy of freight railroads(for their long distance trains) when it comes to how quickly it'll arrive into stations?
I agree with VentureForth, but would add "courtesy." I think most people are apt to be more forgiving about, say, a train running late if the reason for it is explained in a polite and timely manner, and less apt to forgive an experience with staff being rude, nasty, or indifferent. Amtrak's inconsistent--and sometimes poor--customer service is both bad for Amtrak in itself, and exacerbates customers' dissatisfaction with other problems.Passengers don't care about that crap. They only care about price, schedule, and reliability. When they are burned, they don't care why. And they are likely not to return.I do wonder if some of those negative raters would've rated Amtrak more fairly, if more of those reviewers were aware Amtrak is at the mercy of freight railroads(for their long distance trains) when it comes to how quickly it'll arrive into stations?
While I haven't yet ridden the Canadian, I definitely think this is a good idea to have posted while booking tickets since the train is frequently many hours late. Perhaps Amtrak should have something similar.While VIA endeavors to operate on time, the realities of increased freight traffic on tracks that we do not own may give rise to significant delays. We suggest that you do not arrange connecting transportation on the day of your arrival.
On my return from my recent conference and vacation in St. Louis, we had a 6 hour delay into Houston due to track work and a service disruption (the previous northbound Eagle had arrived into St. Louis too late for the operating crew to get their required rest before scheduled departure, and due to Amtrak's penny pinching there was no one available on the extra board). There were several complaints from other Amtrak passengers...but the very next day I also heard griping from some airline passengers who had been traveling via Phoenix and had been held up five hours due to weather. C'est la vie....I will say this about flying, as soon as you need to be at someplace at a specific time and you schedule your flights with hour or two buffer, the airlines make you pay for it.
Enter your email address to join: