A discussion of the proposition as of 24 July 2024.
Re-nationalisation of British Rail
- Thread starter Willbridge
- Start date
Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:
caravanman
Engineer
The video above does seem to outline issues pretty well.
Given that there are several privatised train operating companies (TOC's) that have failed, and their services are now run by the government, it seems that some form of further "nationalisation" does makes sense.
I worked for British Rail myself, back in the day, and it was a complete joined up service. All aspects were interlinked under one organisation, rather than the fragmented current situation.
(Imagine if Amtrak had full oversight of all the stations, the tracks, the freight, the passenger trains, the rolling stock, and so could prioritise resources where they were needed...)
Rationality says that with global warming, the time of eco-friendly improved train travel is here. Humans.... Rational?
Given that there are several privatised train operating companies (TOC's) that have failed, and their services are now run by the government, it seems that some form of further "nationalisation" does makes sense.
I worked for British Rail myself, back in the day, and it was a complete joined up service. All aspects were interlinked under one organisation, rather than the fragmented current situation.
(Imagine if Amtrak had full oversight of all the stations, the tracks, the freight, the passenger trains, the rolling stock, and so could prioritise resources where they were needed...)
Rationality says that with global warming, the time of eco-friendly improved train travel is here. Humans.... Rational?
I do think this renationalization is a step in the right direction. But it will all come down to how much the government is willing to invest in the system. It seems to me that a number of short sighted decisions get made on the basis of cost, a classic example being HS2 which keeps getting trimmed back to the point where it now seems it will not deliver the improvements initially planned, especially if it ends at Old Oak Common and not at Euston. (Imagine if Amtrak's NEC ended at Newark and everybody had to take PATH to complete their trip into NYC).
A hybrid system that preserved some private operators might be the ideal compromise. For example, the ECML currently sees trains from four operators in semi-direct competition, with some overlap from even more. If in that example the mainline services of LNER became the "National" service would Grand Central, Hull Trains and LUMO survive?
jis
Permanent Way Inspector
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
Just like in the US all will depend on how well the National Service is funded and managed. There is no magic in the term Nationalized. It all depends on how it is structured, funded and managed. For example given a choice between funding NHS and Rail Passenger given a fixed finite pot of money, which choice would most want to opt for?
Maglev
Conductor
jis
Permanent Way Inspector
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
We will just have to wait and see what they actually fund at what level, since the budgetary situation in the UK is not going to look anything less than ugly in the foreseeable future. Hard to meaningfully speculate until the new government starts doing stuff.
The Open Access operators will not be directly affected by this. Since LNER is already government-owned and operated, I can't see there being much difference.
Last edited:
Could happen if there's another Sandy before the new tunnels are in service (a decade or more), the old tunnels flood again, and are in such bad shape they can't be restored for years. Then it would be PATH or a ferry bridge on the NEC!
Unless competition is restricted or prohibited.
Was the nationalized British Rail of old really that bad? I experienced it for about 3 weeks in June of 1985, and compared to Amtrak it seemed like I had died and gone into train rider's heaven. I rode suburban trains around London, and after meeting my brother on his way back from a junior year abroad in Nepal, we did a circuit London - Oxford - Birmingham - Shrewsbury - Abergavenny - Cardiff -Bristol - Dawlish - St. Ives - Penzance and back to London.
It seemed like you could take a train to any decently sized town and there were usually multiple departures through the day on most routes. I don't recall any of our trains being delayed or having any mechanical breakdowns. Some of the equipment was old but seemed to be in good repair and clean. The second-class seats were roomy and reasonably comfortable, even if they didn't recline and were in groups two facing pairs of seats separated by a nice large table.
Not much on-board service: From a snack trolley, I bought a paper cup of tea made with a tea bag that made a mockery of this fine British tradition. We also treated ourselves to dinner in a restaurant car on the Penzance to London train that was a nice full course steak dinner but cost us 25 pounds each! And that was back in 1985. I especially appreciated the cheese tray served with dessert. The cheese was under a glass dome and properly warmed to room temperature, something that's hard to find even in fancy restaurants these days. The service was understated, but attentive even if my brother was dressed like some hippie in Indian cotton pajamas. All of this from a nationalized system that had no competition on the rails (but, of course had competition from people driving their cars, buses, and domestic airlines.)
It seemed like you could take a train to any decently sized town and there were usually multiple departures through the day on most routes. I don't recall any of our trains being delayed or having any mechanical breakdowns. Some of the equipment was old but seemed to be in good repair and clean. The second-class seats were roomy and reasonably comfortable, even if they didn't recline and were in groups two facing pairs of seats separated by a nice large table.
Not much on-board service: From a snack trolley, I bought a paper cup of tea made with a tea bag that made a mockery of this fine British tradition. We also treated ourselves to dinner in a restaurant car on the Penzance to London train that was a nice full course steak dinner but cost us 25 pounds each! And that was back in 1985. I especially appreciated the cheese tray served with dessert. The cheese was under a glass dome and properly warmed to room temperature, something that's hard to find even in fancy restaurants these days. The service was understated, but attentive even if my brother was dressed like some hippie in Indian cotton pajamas. All of this from a nationalized system that had no competition on the rails (but, of course had competition from people driving their cars, buses, and domestic airlines.)
Not in my experience. My sense was that the government's decision to sell to private companies was an ideological one, not one based on problems with British Rail. I miss the quality of the past network every time I travel to the UK and have to depend on the current rail system.
From Jago's video it sounds like the open access operators like Lumo would still be allowed to operate.
Labour have stated they have no plans to interfere with open access operators (or freight, which will remain private).Unless competition is restricted or prohibited.
Well, that's generally considered the bare minimum in Europe!
peteypablo
Train Attendant
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2015
- Messages
- 72
The video above does seem to outline issues pretty well.
Given that there are several privatised train operating companies (TOC's) that have failed, and their services are now run by the government, it seems that some form of further "nationalisation" does makes sense.
I worked for British Rail myself, back in the day, and it was a complete joined up service. All aspects were interlinked under one organisation, rather than the fragmented current situation.
(Imagine if Amtrak had full oversight of all the stations, the tracks, the freight, the passenger trains, the rolling stock, and so could prioritise resources where they were needed...)
Rationality says that with global warming, the time of eco-friendly improved train travel is here. Humans.... Rational?
No. I like train travel, but the USA is much more sparsely populated than Europe. And the fact that President Biden has decided that it’s necessary to tap the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to keep gasoline prices is pretty strong evidence that there is not sufficient political will to divert significant resources from personal vehicle travel to make massive improvements to passenger rail.
Plus, remember, it’s not global warming. It’s climate change, crisis, emergency or catastrophe. Colder here, warmer there. Droughts here, floods there. And nobody is following through on their breakthrough pledges.
caravanman
Engineer
I don't think trains might replace personal cars, but maybe they could replace some airline routes. The cities are pollution hotspots, so a better commuter rail system might reduce car use.
I think the expression global warming is fairly correct, in that the earth is warming up across the board, ice caps melting, increasing greenhouse gases?
It seems to me that the global warming, overall, is producing the changes in climate that you refer to?
jis
Permanent Way Inspector
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
Speaking of Labours alleged commitment to rail, is it likely that they will find money to restore the HS-2 project to its form before Rishi Sunak decapitated it?
caravanman
Engineer
Metra Electric Rider
Engineer
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2016
- Messages
- 2,219
I had wondered that too - probably not right away.
Latest posts
-
-
Gateway Project/New York Penn Station capacity improvement- Latest: JuniusLivonius
-
-
Acela 21 (Avelia Liberty) development, testing and deployment (2Q 2024)
- Latest: JuniusLivonius
-
-
-
-
-
