Wonder how far that $1B will go replacing the bridge over Lake Gaston? Since the ALC-Es have proven they will go 125 shame that that speed is not set for many sections. Here is link of the various needed ROW for 110 & 125.
https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Rail-Division-Resources/Documents/sehsr_feis_nc_hm_psh_55.pdf
Big picture, the Tier II was approved, next step is engineering.
To be clear about that PDF, it's from Section U, on the outskirts of Raleigh, and shows the curve widening. It also shows how detailed a Tier II is.
The bridge over Lake Gaston near the state border is in Section L. See
https://railroads.dot.gov/environme...theast-high-speed-rail-richmond-va-raleigh-nc the PDF "TIER II Final EIS," page 2-61, pdf page 212 (of 1141!):
Roanoke River/Lake Gaston – Although the existing track has been removed throughout this area of the Project, the existing single-track bridge remains intact. Under Preferred Alternative VA1/NC1 the Project intends to utilize the piers and substructure of the existing bridge, as well as the superstructure (girders and decking).
I can't recall, from the 1141 pages plus appendices and other materials, if costs estimates are given. But the highest must be Section AA, the beginning of the study, starting from Richmond Main Street Station (RVM), crossing the James River, and redesigning the freight yard in South Richmond, a.k.a. Manchester, then the many roads of the suburbs. About that bridge (but, spoiler alert, see other quote about the bridge from DC2RVA later in this post):
James River – Heading south out of Main Street Station, the existing single-track railroad bridge is elevated on supports built to accommodate double-track through the triple railroad crossing; it remains elevated and transitions to a single-track width as it passes through a gated opening in a floodwall on the north side of the James River before proceeding to cross the river on a single-track bridge.
The designs for Preferred Alternative VA1 require addition of a second track across the James River. The proposed alignment would include a new bridge adjacent to and on the east side of the existing bridge as well as an enlargement of openings in the floodwalls to accommodate the addition of the proposed double track. The specific configuration for the addition of a second track railroad crossing of the James River, however, will be determined during final design within the limits as defined in the Project Tier II FEIS. The addition of a second track will expand railroad capacity and alleviate congestion at this major choke point.
Ah, the Triple Crossing!
I'd forgotten the study does not include the still slow section north of there, from RVR to RVM, through Acca Yard and worse (an astonishing 29 minutes, if you can be astonished while going that slowly. Acca was previously improved to make the western bypass easier to use, but at the end of this project only the Autotrain will use the bypass.) That RVR-RVM part is in DC2RVA, later adjusted for an important cemetery site just north of RVM. DC2RVA is under construction, but I'd guess the southern part is scheduled near the end.
In fact, RVM south to Centralia (about 10 miles), including the James River bridge, is in both SEHSR (Richmond to Raleigh) and in DC2RVA. Now, SEHSR (R2R) is Tier II approved, awaiting engineering, while DC2RVA is Tier II approved, under construction. Any consequences of that? Needs money either way.
One consequence, DC2RVA splits the difference expressed in the SEHSR caveat about "limits" to a new bridge over the James. It's a new bridge, but single-track:
Construct substructure/foundation for a new two-track rail bridge (DC2RVA Project includes construction of a single track bridge with space to add a second track, if required for future capacity) on the S-Line across the James River.
I wonder if the agreement with the freight railroads requires the shift of Amtrak off the bypass west of Richmond before the S-line can open.
Finally, Newport News does get faster service by shaving down that 29 minutes, but Norfolk was chosen for inclusion in HSR over NPN. Maps showing both as part of HSR were amended to show only NFK roughly twenty years ago. And as it turned out, HSR to NFK is not in the plans discussed here. The new NPN does open early next year, at a location up the line by the Newport News / Williamsburg airport. Current NPN is on the edge of downtown. The ideal plan there would have bypassed the port yard and still served downtown, a somewhat vacant area, the kind of place new housing is going in around the region; and Hampton, by one measure the oldest city in the U.S. Over 25,000 people work at the Newport News Shipyard, not to mention the port, but transit is all bus.