jis
Permanent Way Inspector
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
^^ **Strongly agree with DA** ^^
I recall with much anguish, the decision that my sister and I had to make about our dear Mother, a decision we arrived at not lightheartedly, but after great deal of deliberation, taking deeply into consideration her wishes expressed to us often implicitly, in discussions over many decades. To this day everyone involved believes we made the right decision in pulling life support. So no, life is **not** always better than the alternative. It depends on the situation ... **always**. Luckily 99 cases out of hundred the situation dictates that the decision is towards "life". But that does not mean that the other 1 out of hundred (or hopefully even a smaller proportion) does not exist.
All that I can say is as far as possible *being responsible for making a decision about the life or death of someone* as the responsible party in a living will, documented or implicit, is probably not the best place to be at.
I recall with much anguish, the decision that my sister and I had to make about our dear Mother, a decision we arrived at not lightheartedly, but after great deal of deliberation, taking deeply into consideration her wishes expressed to us often implicitly, in discussions over many decades. To this day everyone involved believes we made the right decision in pulling life support. So no, life is **not** always better than the alternative. It depends on the situation ... **always**. Luckily 99 cases out of hundred the situation dictates that the decision is towards "life". But that does not mean that the other 1 out of hundred (or hopefully even a smaller proportion) does not exist.
All that I can say is as far as possible *being responsible for making a decision about the life or death of someone* as the responsible party in a living will, documented or implicit, is probably not the best place to be at.